Saratov JOURNAL of Medical and Scientific Research

The clinical significance of the prevalence of parapancreatitis in pan-creonecrosis

Year: 2016, volume 12 Issue: №1 Pages: 57-60
Heading: Surgery Article type: Original article
Authors: Alexandrov D.A., Tolstokorov A.S., Sedov D.S.
Organization: Saratov State Medical University

Tftea/m of the study is to determine the relationship of clinical surgical treatment options of degradation of retroperi-tonealfat. Material and Methods. We have analyzed the results of treatment of 1177 patients with necrotizing pancreatitis, taking into account the severity and characteristics of parapancreatitis. Statistical data processing was carried out by the program Statistica for Windows 6.0. using the Student's criterion. Results. The variety of clinical forms of pancreatic necrosis due to a combination of options lesions of the pancreas and retroperitoneal fat. The outcome of pancreatic necrosis is determined not only by the degree of destruction of the pancreas, but also features parapancreatitis. The allocation of limited and common prevalence of parapancreatitis was substantiated and specified. Conclusion. The effectiveness of the treatment of pancreatic necrosis is dependent on the development options of parapancreatitis which present the predictive and tactical value.

1. Bagnenko S.F., Kurygin A.A., Sinenchenko G.l. Surgical pancreatology. St. Petersburg: Rech, 2009; 608 p.
2. Dyuzheva T.G., Juice E.V., Ramishvili V.S., et al. Early CT signs of predicting various forms parapankreonekroza. Annals of Surgical Hepatology 2009; 14 (4): 54-63
3. Tolstoy V.P., Panov, V.B. Krasnorogov, et al. Parapankreatit (etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment). St. Petersburg, 2003; 256 p.
4. Zatevakhin I.I., Tsitsiashvili M.Sh., Budurova M.D., et al. Pancreatonecrosis. M., 2007; 223 p.
5. Savelyev V.S., Filimonov M.l., Burnevich S.Z. Pancreatic necrosis. M.: MIA, 2008; 264 p.
6. Dyuzheva T.G., Juice E.V., Schaefer A.V., et al. Configuration pancreatic necrosis and differentiated treatment of acute pancreatitis. Annals of Surgical Hepatology 2013; 18 (1): 92-102
7. Saveliev V.S., Gelfand B.R., Filimonov M.l., et al. The destructive pancreatitis: Evidence methods of diagnosis and treatment: Guidelines. M., 2008; 11 p.
8. Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis С, et al. Acute Pancreatitis Classification Working Group. Classification of acute pancreatitis 2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut 2013; 62 (1): 102-111
9. Freeman ML, Werner J, van Santvoort HC, et al. Interventions for Necrotizing Pancreatiti: Summary of Multidisciplinary Consensus Conference. Pancreas 2012; 41 (8): 1176-1194
10. IAP/APA evidence-based guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis. Working Group IAP/APA (International Association of Pancreatology/American Pancreatic Association) Acute Pancreatitis Guidelines. Pancreatology 2013; (13): 1-15
11. Dibirov M.D., Yuanov A.A. Pancreatonecrosis: Diagnosis and treatment protocols: Training handbook. Moscow, 2012; 366 p.

2016_01_057-060.pdf347.01 KB

No votes yet