Оценка эффективности эндоскопических методов хирургического лечения доброкачественной гиперплазии простаты на основе результатов данных международных метаанализов (обзор)

Литература:
1. McConnell JD. The pathophysiology of benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Androl 1991; (12): 356-63.
2. Gu FL, Xia TL, Kong XT. Preliminary study of the frequency of benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostatic cancer in China. Urology 1994; (44): 688-91.
3. Girman CJ, Jacobsen SJ, Tsukamoto T, et al. Health-related quality of life associated with lower urinary tract symptoms in four countries. Urology 1998; (51): 428-36.
4. Welch G, Weinger K, Barry MJ. Quality-of-life impact of lower urinary tract symptom severity: results from the Health Professionals Follow-up Study. Urology 2002; (59): 245-50.
5. Mordasini L, Di Bona C, Klein J, et al. 80-W GreenLight laser vaporization versus transurethral resection of the prostate for treatment of benign prostatic obstruction: 5-year outcomes of a single-center prospective randomized trial. Urology 2018; (116): 144-9.
6. Liu Z, Li YW, Wu WR, Lu Q. Long-term clinical efficacy and safety profile of transurethral resection of prostate vs plasmakinetic resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology 2017; (103): 198-203.
7. Tang Y, Li J, Pu C, et al. Bipolar transurethral resection versus monopolar transurethral resection for benign prostatic hypertrophy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endourol 2014; 28 (9): 1107-14. DOI: 10.1089/end.2014.0188.
8. Inzunza G, Rada G, Majerson A. Bipolar or monopolar transurethral resection for benign prostatic hyperplasia? Medwave 2018; 18(1):e7134. DOI: 10.5867/medwave. 2018.01.7134.
9. Пасько В. Г., Руденко М.И., Андрюшкин В.Н., Воробейчук А. Н. Анестезиологическое обеспечение эндоскопических урологических вмешательств. URL: http:// docplayer.ru/27273145-Anesteziologicheskoe-obespechenieendoskopicheskih-urologicheskih-vmeshatelstv. html (дата обращения: 14.04.2019.
10. Alexander СЕ, Scullion MM, Omar Ml, et al. Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic obstruction. Meta-Analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 12 (12): CD009629. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009629.pub4.
11. Muhammad IO, Thomas BL, Cameron EA, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical effectiveness of bipolar compared with monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). BJU Int 2014; 113(1): 24-35. DOI: 10.1111 /bju. 12281.
12. Huang SW, Tsai CY, Tseng CS, et al. Comparative efficacy and safety of new surgical treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia: systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ 2019; (367): 15919. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.l5919.
13. Chaohui G, Zhou N, Gurung P. Lasers versus bipolar technology in the transurethral treatment of benign prostatic enlargement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. World J Urol 2020; (38): 907-18.
14. Xiao KW, Zhou L, He Q, et al. Transurethral endoscopic enucleation of the prostate using a diode laser versus bipolar plasmakinetic for benign prostatic obstruction: A meta-analysis. Lasers Med Sci 2020; 35 (5): 1159-69. DOI: 10.1007/sl 0103-020-02949-9.
15. Xiaonan Z, Xin H, Dehong C, et al. Comparison of short-term outcomes between button-type bipolar plasma vaporization and transurethral resection for the prostate: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Med Sci 2019; 16 (12): 1564-72. DOI:10.7150/ijms.38618.
16. Woclawski ML, Carneiro A, Rodrigo DMA, et al. 'Button type' bipolar plasma vaporisation of the prostate compared with standard transurethral resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcome studies. BJU Int 2016; 117 (4): 662-8. DOI: 10.1111/bju.13255.
17. Kai-Wen X, Liang Z, Qing H, et al. Enucleation of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia thulium laser versus holmium laser: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lasers Med Sci 2019; 34 (4): 815-26. DOI: 10.1007/s10103-018-02697-x.
18. Li W, Qiu-Yan Y, Yan L, et al. Efficacy and safety of laser surgery and transurethral resection of the prostate for treating benign prostate hyperplasia: a network meta-analysis. Asian Рас J Cancer Prev 2016; 17 (9): 4281-8.
19. Sun F, Sun X, Shi Q, Zhai Y Transurethral procedures in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of effectiveness and complications. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018; 97 (51): e13360. DOI: 10.1097/MD. 0000000000013360.
20. Peng L, Zheng XN, Wu JP, et al. Holmium laser technologies versus photoselective GreenLight vaporization for patients with benign prostatichyperplasia: a meta-analysis. Lasers Med Sci 2020; 35 (7): 1441-50.
21. Mottet N, Anidjar M, Bourdon O, et al. Randomized comparison of transurethral electroresection and holmium: YAG laser vaporization for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Endourol 1999; 13 (2): 127-30.
22. Kahokehr AA, Gilling PJ. Which laser works best for benign prostatic hyperplasia? Curr Urol Rep 2013; 14 (6): 614-9.
23. Marien T, Kadihasanoglu M, Miller NL. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: patient selection and perspectives. Res Rep Urol 2016; (8): 181-92.
24. Cornu JN, Ahyai S, Bachmann A, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of functional outcomes and complications following transurethral procedures for lower urinary tract symptoms resulting from benign prostatic obstruction: an update. Eur Urol 2015; 67 (6): 1066-96.
25. Zhong J, Feng Z, Peng Y, Liang H. A systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and safety following holmium laser enucleation of prostate and transurethral resection of prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology 2019; (131): 14-20.
26. Li S, Zeng XT, Ruan XL, et al. Holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection in patients with benign prostate hyperplasia: an updated systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. PLoS One 2014; 9 (7): e101615. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101615.
27. Yin L,Teng J, Huang CJ, etal. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus transurethral resection of the prostate: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Endourol 2013; 27 (5): 604-11.
28. Guo Q, Xiao Y, Li JW, et al. Safety and effect of transurethral holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus bipolar transurethral plasmakinetic prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a meta-analysis. National journal of andrology 2016; 22 (10): 914-22.
29. Qian X, Liu H, Xu D, et al. Functional outcomes and complications following B-TURP versus HoLEP for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a review of the literature and meta-analysis. Aging Male 2017; 20 (3): 184-91.
30. Zou Z, Xu A, Zheng S, et al. Dual-centre randomized-controlled trial comparing transurethral endoscopic enucleation of the prostate using diode laser vs. bipolar plasmakinetic for the treatment of LUTS secondary of benign prostate obstruction: 1-year follow-up results. World journal of urology 2018; 36 (7): 1117-26.
31. Feng L, Zhang D, Tian Y, Song J. Thulium laserenucleation versus plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate: a randomized trial of a single center. Journal of endourology/Endourological Society 2016; 30 (6). DOI:10.1089/end.2015.0867.
32. Zang YC, Deng XX, Yang DR, et al. Photoselective vaporization of the prostate with GreenLight 120-W laser versus transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Lasers Med Sci 2016; 31 (2): 235-40. DOI: 10.1007/sl0103-015-1843-1.
33. Ding M, Nian YQ, Hu SB, et al. Safety and effectiveness of Green Light 120-W laser photoselective vaporization of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a meta-analysis. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue 2015; 21 (7): 646-54.
34. Zhou Y, Xue B, Mohammad NA, et al. GreenLight high-performance system (HPS) 120-W laser vaporization versus transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a meta-analysis of the published results of randomized controlled trials. Lasers Med Sci 2016; 31 (3): 485-95. DOI: 10.1007/sl0103-016-1895-x.
35. Ding H, Du W, Lu ZP, et al. Photoselective green-light laser vaporisation vs. TURP for BPH: meta-analysis. Asian J Androl2012; 14 (5): 720-5.
36. Lai S, Peng P, DiaoT, etal. Comparison of photoselective green light laser vaporisation versus traditional transurethral resection for benign prostate hyperplasia: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and prospective studies. BMJ Open 2019; 9 (8): e028855. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028855.
37. Zhuo L, Ping C, Jun W, et al. The impact of surgical treatments for lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic hyperplasia on male erectile function: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Medicine 2016; 95 (24): e3862. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003862.
38. Jiang H, Zhou Y Safety and efficacy of thulium laser prostatectomy versus transurethral resection of prostate for treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia: a meta-analysis. Low Urin Tract Symptoms 2016; 8 (3): 165-70. DOI: 10.1111/kits. 12092.
39. Kun T, Zhengli X, Ding X, et al. Early outcomes of thulium laser versus transurethral resection of the prostate for managing benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. J Endourol 2014; 28 (1): 65-72. DOI: 10.1089/end.2013.0404.
40. Chenming Z, Huan Y, Zhiqiang C, et al. Thulium laser resection versus plasmakinetic resection of prostates in the treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia: a meta-analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2016; 26 (10): 789-98. DOI: 10.1089/lap.2016.0044.