Evaluation of the effectiveness of endoscopic methods for surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia based on the results of international meta-analyses data (review)

Bibliography:
1. McConnell JD. The pathophysiology of benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Androl 1991; (12): 356-63.
2. Gu FL, Xia TL, Kong XT. Preliminary study of the frequency of benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostatic cancer in China. Urology 1994; (44): 688-91.
3. Girman CJ, Jacobsen SJ, Tsukamoto T, et al. Health-related quality of life associated with lower urinary tract symptoms in four countries. Urology 1998; (51): 428-36.
4. Welch G, Weinger K, Barry MJ. Quality-of-life impact of lower urinary tract symptom severity: results from the Health Professionals Follow-up Study. Urology 2002; (59): 245-50.
5. Mordasini L, Di Bona C, Klein J, et al. 80-W GreenLight laser vaporization versus transurethral resection of the prostate for treatment of benign prostatic obstruction: 5-year outcomes of a single-center prospective randomized trial. Urology 2018; (116): 144-9.
6. Liu Z, Li YW, Wu WR, Lu Q. Long-term clinical efficacy and safety profile of transurethral resection of prostate vs plasmakinetic resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology 2017; (103): 198-203.
7. Tang Y, Li J, Pu C, et al. Bipolar transurethral resection versus monopolar transurethral resection for benign prostatic hypertrophy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endourol 2014; 28 (9): 1107-14. DOI: 10.1089/end.2014.0188.
8. Inzunza G, Rada G, Majerson A. Bipolar or monopolar transurethral resection for benign prostatic hyperplasia? Medwave 2018; 18(1):e7134. DOI: 10.5867/medwave. 2018.01.7134.
9. Pas'ko VG, Rudenko Ml, Andryushkin VN, Vorobeychuk AN. Anesteziologicheskoe obespechenie ehndoskopicheskikh urologicheskikh vmeshatel'stv. URL: http://docplayer.ru/27273145-Anesteziologicheskoe-obespechenie-endoskopicheskih-urologicheskih-vmeshatelstv. html (14 Apr 2019.
10. Alexander СЕ, Scullion MM, Omar Ml, et al. Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic obstruction. Meta-Analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 12 (12): CD009629. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009629.pub4.
11. Muhammad IO, Thomas BL, Cameron EA, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical effectiveness of bipolar compared with monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). BJU Int 2014; 113(1): 24-35. DOI: 10.1111 /bju. 12281.
12. Huang SW, Tsai CY, Tseng CS, et al. Comparative efficacy and safety of new surgical treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia: systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ 2019; (367): 15919. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.l5919.
13. Chaohui G, Zhou N, Gurung P. Lasers versus bipolar technology in the transurethral treatment of benign prostatic enlargement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. World J Urol 2020; (38): 907-18.
14. Xiao KW, Zhou L, He Q, et al. Transurethral endoscopic enucleation of the prostate using a diode laser versus bipolar plasmakinetic for benign prostatic obstruction: A meta-analysis. Lasers Med Sci 2020; 35 (5): 1159-69. DOI: 10.1007/sl 0103-020-02949-9.
15. Xiaonan Z, Xin H, Dehong C, et al. Comparison of short-term outcomes between button-type bipolar plasma vaporization and transurethral resection for the prostate: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Med Sci 2019; 16 (12): 1564-72. DOI:10.7150/ijms.38618.
16. Woclawski ML, Carneiro A, Rodrigo DMA, et al. 'Button type' bipolar plasma vaporisation of the prostate compared with standard transurethral resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcome studies. BJU Int 2016; 117 (4): 662-8. DOI: 10.1111/bju.13255.
17. Kai-Wen X, Liang Z, Qing H, et al. Enucleation of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia thulium laser versus holmium laser: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lasers Med Sci 2019; 34 (4): 815-26. DOI: 10.1007/s10103-018-02697-x.
18. Li W, Qiu-Yan Y, Yan L, et al. Efficacy and safety of laser surgery and transurethral resection of the prostate for treating benign prostate hyperplasia: a network meta-analysis. Asian Рас J Cancer Prev 2016; 17 (9): 4281-8.
19. Sun F, Sun X, Shi Q, Zhai Y Transurethral procedures in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of effectiveness and complications. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018; 97 (51): e13360. DOI: 10.1097/MD. 0000000000013360.
20. Peng L, Zheng XN, Wu JP, et al. Holmium laser technologies versus photoselective GreenLight vaporization for patients with benign prostatichyperplasia: a meta-analysis. Lasers Med Sci 2020; 35 (7): 1441-50.
21. Mottet N, Anidjar M, Bourdon O, et al. Randomized comparison of transurethral electroresection and holmium: YAG laser vaporization for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Endourol 1999; 13 (2): 127-30.
22. Kahokehr AA, Gilling PJ. Which laser works best for benign prostatic hyperplasia? Curr Urol Rep 2013; 14 (6): 614-9.
23. Marien T, Kadihasanoglu M, Miller NL. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: patient selection and perspectives. Res Rep Urol 2016; (8): 181-92.
24. Cornu JN, Ahyai S, Bachmann A, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of functional outcomes and complications following transurethral procedures for lower urinary tract symptoms resulting from benign prostatic obstruction: an update. Eur Urol 2015; 67 (6): 1066-96.
25. Zhong J, Feng Z, Peng Y, Liang H. A systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and safety following holmium laser enucleation of prostate and transurethral resection of prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology 2019; (131): 14-20.
26. Li S, Zeng XT, Ruan XL, et al. Holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection in patients with benign prostate hyperplasia: an updated systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. PLoS One 2014; 9 (7): e101615. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101615.
27. Yin L,Teng J, Huang CJ, etal. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus transurethral resection of the prostate: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Endourol 2013; 27 (5): 604-11.
28. Guo Q, Xiao Y, Li JW, et al. Safety and effect of transurethral holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus bipolar transurethral plasmakinetic prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a meta-analysis. National journal of andrology 2016; 22 (10): 914-22.
29. Qian X, Liu H, Xu D, et al. Functional outcomes and complications following B-TURP versus HoLEP for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a review of the literature and meta-analysis. Aging Male 2017; 20 (3): 184-91.
30. Zou Z, Xu A, Zheng S, et al. Dual-centre randomized-controlled trial comparing transurethral endoscopic enucleation of the prostate using diode laser vs. bipolar plasmakinetic for the treatment of LUTS secondary of benign prostate obstruction: 1-year follow-up results. World journal of urology 2018; 36 (7): 1117-26.
31. Feng L, Zhang D, Tian Y, Song J. Thulium laserenucleation versus plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate: a randomized trial of a single center. Journal of endourology/Endourological Society 2016; 30 (6). DOI:10.1089/end.2015.0867.
32. Zang YC, Deng XX, Yang DR, et al. Photoselective vaporization of the prostate with GreenLight 120-W laser versus transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Lasers Med Sci 2016; 31 (2): 235-40. DOI: 10.1007/sl0103-015-1843-1.
33. Ding M, Nian YQ, Hu SB, et al. Safety and effectiveness of Green Light 120-W laser photoselective vaporization of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a meta-analysis. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue 2015; 21 (7): 646-54.
34. Zhou Y, Xue B, Mohammad NA, et al. GreenLight high-performance system (HPS) 120-W laser vaporization versus transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a meta-analysis of the published results of randomized controlled trials. Lasers Med Sci 2016; 31 (3): 485-95. DOI: 10.1007/sl0103-016-1895-x.
35. Ding H, Du W, Lu ZP, et al. Photoselective green-light laser vaporisation vs. TURP for BPH: meta-analysis. Asian J Androl2012; 14 (5): 720-5.
36. Lai S, Peng P, DiaoT, etal. Comparison of photoselective green light laser vaporisation versus traditional transurethral resection for benign prostate hyperplasia: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and prospective studies. BMJ Open 2019; 9 (8): e028855. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028855.
37. Zhuo L, Ping C, Jun W, et al. The impact of surgical treatments for lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic hyperplasia on male erectile function: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Medicine 2016; 95 (24): e3862. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003862.
38. Jiang H, Zhou Y Safety and efficacy of thulium laser prostatectomy versus transurethral resection of prostate for treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia: a meta-analysis. Low Urin Tract Symptoms 2016; 8 (3): 165-70. DOI: 10.1111/kits. 12092.
39. Kun T, Zhengli X, Ding X, et al. Early outcomes of thulium laser versus transurethral resection of the prostate for managing benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. J Endourol 2014; 28 (1): 65-72. DOI: 10.1089/end.2013.0404.
40. Chenming Z, Huan Y, Zhiqiang C, et al. Thulium laser resection versus plasmakinetic resection of prostates in the treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia: a meta-analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2016; 26 (10): 789-98. DOI: 10.1089/lap.2016.0044.