Choosing the formula for calculating optical power of intraocular lens on "short" eyes using the potential of artificial intelligence
Heading: Ophthalmology Article type: Original article
Authors: Vinogradov A.R., Balalin S.V., Solodkova E.G.
Organization: Volgograd State Medical University, S. Fedorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution, the Volgograd Branch
Objective: to carry out a comparative analysis of IOL fitting accuracy in patients with eye length less than 22.0 mm using Barrett Universal II, Kane, Hoffer Q and artificial intelligence formulas. Material and methods. The results of 88 phacoemulsification cataract operations with implantation of monofocal lOLs were analyzed. Preoperative biometry and IOL calculations were performed on the IOL Master 700. The accuracy of IOL fitting was also determined using the LensCalc program, which is based on artificial intelligence (DecisionTreeClassifier). Results. The eye length of the patients ranged from 19.8 to 22 mm. The prediction of the target refraction hit was the most accurate when using Barrett Universal II formulas as opposed to Hoffer Q (Z=2.12; p=0.034). The mean value of the target refraction hit error was not different when using the Barrett Universal II formula compared to the Kane formula (p>0.05). Using artificial intelligence it was found that higher accuracy in the results of IOL optical power determination was achieved when using the Barrett Universal II formula. Conclusion. Based on a comparative analysis of the study results and assessment of IOL fitting accuracy using artificial intelligence, it was found that the Barrett Universal II formula (4th generation) is more accurate in determining the optical power of lOLs in "short" eyes than the Hoffer Q formula (3rd generation). The results obtained using the Barrett Universal II formula, in contrast to the Hoffer Q formula, do not differ from the data calculated using the Kane formula (5th generation), which, according to the results of most studies, is the most accurate IOL selection formula at present (p>0.05).
Bibliography:
1. Cheng Н, Kane JX, Liu L, et al. Refractive predictability using the lOLMaster 700 and artificial intelligence — based IOL power formulas compared to standard formulas. J Refract Surg. 2020; 36 (7): 466-72. DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20200514-02
2. Su PF, Lo AY, Hu CY, Chang SW. Anterior chamber depth measurement in phakic and pseudophakic eyes. Optom Vis Sci. 2008; 85 (12): 1193-2000. DOI: 10.1097/OPX. 0b013e31818e8ceb
3. IOL calculation in patients with IOL calculation in patients with hypermetropia. New in ophthalmology. 2014; 3: 64-5.
4. Egorova EV, Malyugin BE, Morozova ТА, Polyanskaya EG. Anatomic topographic features of anterior segment of pseudophakic eyes after cataract phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation by means of ultrasound biomicroscopy. Kataraktal'naya i refraktsionnaya khirurgiya. 2010; 4: 12-6.
5. Pershin KB, Pashinova NF, Tsygankov AYu, Legkikh SL. IOL optic power calculation in patients with eye axial length 24-28 mm without preceding refractive surgery. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2016; 13 (2): 89-96. DOI: 10.1800 8/1816-5095-2016-2-89-96
6. Pershin KB, Pashinova NF, Lih IA, Tsygankov AYu. Comparative analysis of the calculation accuracy of intraocular lenses using seven formulas in eyes with an axial length of less than 20.00 mm. Sovremennye tehnologii v oftal'mologii. 2021; 1 (36): 57-61. DOI: 10.25276/2 312-4911-2021-1-57-61
7. Pershin KB, Pashinova NF, Lih IA, Tsygankov AYu. Analysis of the accuracy of six formulas for calculating the optical power of intraocular lenses in eyes with an axial length of 20-22 mm. Saratov Journal of Medical Scientific Research. 2020; 16 (2): 638-42.
8. Kane Formula. URL: https://www.iolformula.com/about/ (15Feb2024).
9. Maljugin BJe, Sahnov SN, Aksenova LE. Application of machine learning methods in developing an algorithm for diagnosing keratoconus. Vestnik of St. Petersburg state university of technology and design. Series 1. Natural and technical sciences. 2022; (1): 79-86. DOI: 10.46418/2079-8199_2022_1_12
10. Maljugin BJe, Sahnov SN, Mjasnikova VV, Aksenova LE. Application of artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and surgery of keratoconus: a systematic review. Fyodorov Journal of Ophthalmic Surgery. 2022; (1): 77-96. DOI: 10.25276/0235-4160-2022-1-77-96
11. KuroyedovAV, Ostapenko GA, Mitroshina KV, Movsisyan AB. State of the art of glaucoma diagnosis: Neural networks and artificial intelligence. Russian Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology. 2019; 19 (4): 230-7. DOI: 10.32364/ 2311 -7729-2019-19-4-230-237
12. Dobrov ER. The use of neural networks in the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy. Modeli, sistemy, seti v ekonomike, tekhnike, prirode i obshchestve = Models, Systems, Networks in Economics, Technology, Nature and Society. 2022; (2): 90-105. DOI: 10.21685/2227-8486-2022-2-7
13. Xia Т, Martinez СЕ, Tsai LM. Update on intraocular lens formulas and calculations. Asia Рас J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2020; 9(3): 186-93. DOI: 10.1097/APO.0000000000000293
14. Clarke GP, Burmeister J. Comparison of intraocular lens computations using a neural network versus the Holladay formula. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1997; 23 (10): 1585-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0886-3350(97)80034-x
15. Arzamastsev A.A., Fabrikantov O.L., Zenkova N.A., Belikov S.V. Calculation of intraocular lenses (IOL) in ophthalmology using artificial intelligence models. In: Actual problems of applied mathematics, computer science and mechanics: Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference. Voronezh, December 13-15, 2021. Voronezh: Welborn, 2022; p. 291-6.
16. Melles RB, Holladay JT, Chang WJ. Accuracy of intraocular lens calculation formulas. Ophthalmology. 2018; 125 (2): 169-78. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.08.027
17. Siddiqui AA, Juthani V, Kang J, Chuck RS. The future of intraocular lens calculations: Ladas Super Formula. Ann Eye Sci. 2019; (4): 19. DOI: 10.21037/aes.2019.04.02
18. Davidorf JM. Accuracy of Ladas Super Formula. URL: https://ascrs.org/clinical-education/abstracts/2018/accuracy-of-ladas-super-formula (15 Feb 2024).
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| 2024_02_135-139.pdf | 415.29 KB |




