Saratov JOURNAL of Medical and Scientific Research

Features of physical development of patients with gastric cancer

Year: 2020, volume 16 Issue: №1 Pages: 104-108
Heading: Human anatomy Article type: Original article
Authors: Gorbunova Е.А., Gasanova D.M., Filkin G.N., Medvedeva N.N.
Organization: Krasnoyarsk Regional Clinical Dispensary, Krasnoyarsk State Medical University n. a. Professor V.F. Voyno-Yasenetsky

Purpose of this research was to identify features of somatometric, index and bioimpedance indicators in the assessment of the physical status of patients with gastric cancer in the Krasnoyarsk region. Material and Methods. In this report constitutes the results of the exploration of 200 patients diagnosed with stomach cancer, 108 women and 92 men. The average age is 61.6 ± 10.9 years. Patients with an established diagnosis of gastric cancer, were examined by anthropometric and bioimpedance methods of research. During the research of the physical status of patients with gastric cancer of different age groups at of both sexes was carried out, the index of body weight (IBW) or J. M. Tanner index (1951). By this index is calculated type of gender dimorphism. Results. Features of the physical development of patients with gastric cancer are received. There are the increased body weight and obesity, gynecomorphic type of men, women have a mesomorfic and gynecomorfic types of a constitution. According to the results of bioimpedance analysis the indexes of component composition of the body, decreased in men and women representatives gynecomorfic body type. Conclusion. The features of somatometric, index and bioimpedance indicators characterizing of the physical development of patients with gastric cancer were revealed.

1. Medvedeva NN, Nikolaev VG, Derevtsova SN, et al. Evaluation of somatoneuropsychological human health. Siberian Medical Review 2016; (3): 73-80.
2. Nikitiuk DB, Klochkova SV, Rozhkova EA, et al. The Anthropometrical Characteristic of Physical Status of Mature Women. Journal of Anatomy and Histopathology 2015; 4 (1): 9-14.
3. Russkikh AN, Shabokha AD, Gorbunov NS, et al. Variant anatomy of the porto-caval system of the stomach cardial department and the abdominal department of the esophagus in human. Siberian Medical Review 2018; (2):85-90.
4. Gaivoronskiy IV, Nichiporuk Gl, Gaivoronskiy IN, Nichiporuk NG. Bioimpedansometry as a method of the component bodystructure (review). Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Medicine 2017; 12 (4): 365-84.
5. Fan JH, Wang JB, Wang SM. Body mass index and risk of gastric cancer: A 30-year follow-up study in the Linxian general population trial cohort. Cancer science 2017; 8: 1667-72.
6. Fock KM. Review article: the epidemiology and prevention of gastric cancer. Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics 2014; 40 (3): 250-60.
7. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. [Internet] 2019; Available from:
8. Kaprin AD, Starinskiy VV, Petrova GV Malignancies in Russia in 2017 (morbidity and mortality). Moscow, 2018; 236 p.
9. Modestov АА, Safontsev IP, Zukov RA, et al. Cancer incidence in the Krasnoyarsk Krai. Russian Journal of Oncology 2016; 21 (1-2): 76-81.
10. Liu X, Qiu Н, Kong Р, Zhou Z, Sun P. Gastric cancer, nutritional status, and outcome. OncoTargets and Therapy 2017; 10:2107-14.
11. Tanner JM. Current advances in the study of physique: photogrammetric anthropometry and an androgyny scale. The Lancet 1951; 1 (6654): 574-9.
12. Sindeeva LV. Variability of body composition and biological age of a person using the example of the population of Eastern Siberia: DScdiss. Krasnoyarsk, 2014; 327 p.
13. Wang С, Weber A, Graham DY. Age, period, and cohort effects on gastric cancer, mortality. Dig Dis Sci 2015; 60 (2): 514-23.
14. Kaprin AD. Screening of gastric cancer: state of art and perspectives. Health Care of Russia: Federal directory 2015; (16): 125-32.

2020_01_104-108.pdf333.74 KB

No votes yet