Improving intersectoral cooperation on public health at the regional level under the context of the COVID-19 pandemic
Heading: public health Article type: Original article
Authors: Royuk V.V., Reshetnikov V.A., Sidelnikov S.A., Korshever N.G.
Organization: First Moscow State Medical University n.a. I.M. Sechenov, Saratov State Medical University
Objective: development of organizational technology for improving intersectoral interaction on public health protection at the regional level in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Material and methods. The modeling method was used, which is implemented in the form of flowcharts summarizing obtained materials devoted to the study of the characteristics of the sectors of the state and society interested in protecting public health, the determinants of health, the design of an automated method for multi-vector evaluation of the success of intersectoral interaction in the conditions of COVID-19. Results. The technology of intersectoral interaction on public health protection at the regional level in the conditions of the COVID-19 pandemic has been developed and the algorithm of its implementation has been substantiated. At the same time, two modules have been identified, one of which allows to form preventive programs, the other — to improve health care based on the results of a multi-vector assessment of the success of this process. Conclusion. The developed organizational technology makes it possible to contribute to the improvement of intersectoral cooperation on public health protection at the regional level in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Bibliography:
1. Domanski D, Howaldt J, Kaletka С A comprehensive concept of social innovation and its implications for the local context — on the growing importance of social innovation ecosystems and infrastructures. European Planning Studies. 2019; 28 (3): 454-74. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2019.1639397
2. Kang E. Intersectoral collaboration for physical activity in Korean Healthy Cities. Health Promotion International. 2016; (31): 551-61. DOI: 10.1093/heapro/dav020
3. Myl'nikova LA, Kamynina NN. Interagency programmatic approach to organize public health promotion events in Moscow. City Healthcare Journal. 2020; 1 (2): 20-31. DOI: 10.47619/2713-2617.zm.2020.v1i2;20-31
4. Petrov АР, Horoshkevich NG, Shilovtsev AV. Social partnership in modern Russia: Subjects of interaction. Gumani-tarnyye, sotsialno-ekonomicheskiye i obshchestvennyye nauki = Humanities, Socio-economic and Social Sciences. 2020; 12 (1): 63-7. DOI: 10.23672/П1736-8934-1887-п
5. Rakhmetova AM, Kalkabayeva GM. Institutional aspects in regulating interaction between financial and innovation sectors. Bulletin of Karaganda University. Economy series. 2020; 1 (97): 101-10. DOI 10.31489/2020Ec1/101-110
6. Solovyova TS. Development of social innovations: Problems and prospects of interaction between regional stakeholders. Managing Sustainable Development. 2021; 1 (32): 70-8.
7. The Bangkok Charter for health promotion in the globalized world. World Health Organization. 2005. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/NB05043 (25 Jan 2023).
8. The Ottawa Charter for health promotion. World Health Organization. 1986. URL: http://www.OttawaCharterforHealth Promotion (25 Jan 2023).
9. Murashko MA. The first pandemic of the digital age: Lessons for national health. Natsional'noe Zdravookhranenie = National Health Care (Russia). 2020; 1 (1): 4-8.
10. Reshetnikov VA, Korshever NG, Royuk VV, Sidelnikov SA. Sectors interested in public health protection in the subject of the Russian Federation in the conditions of the COVID-19 pandemic. Problems of Social Hygiene, Health Care and the History of Medicine. 2022; 30 (5): 713-8. DOI: 10.32687/0869-866Х-2022-30-5-713-718
11. Reshetnikov VA, Korshever NG, Royuk VV, Sidelnikov SA. Determinants of health in the conditions of the COVID-19 pandemic. Hygiene and Sanitation. 2022; 101 (12): 1575-80. DOI: 10.47470/0016-9900-2022-101 -12-1575-1580
12. Knyazyuk NF, Kitsul IS. The methodology of building an integrated management system of medical organizations. Moscow: Manager of Healthcare, 2013; 312 p.
13. Mikhaylova YuV, Son IM, Golubev NA, et al. Innovative technologies in estimation of efficiency and activity efficacy of medical institutions of Stavropol region rendering primary health care. Kazan Medical Journal. 2019; 100 (5): 810-15. DOI: 10.17816/KMJ2019-810.
14. Nurbaeva G, Kabdueva G, Apeisova D. Lean manufacturing as one of the new management technologies in the healthcare system. Journal of Health Deevelopment. 2019; 3 (32): 60-8.
15. Osadchaya SM, Osadchaya AN. Digital technologies in the management of a medical institution. Business. Education. Law. 2022; 1 (58): 132-6. DOI: 10.25683/VOLBI.2022.58.160
16. Sertakova OV, Dzyuba NA, Sukhinina IV Inter-firm cooperation and digital technologies: mutual determinants of the development of the quality of medical care and rehabilitation of the population. Economy and Society: Modern Models of Development. 2021; 11 (1): 29-46. DOI: 10.18334/ecsod 1.1.111621
17. Tkhorikov ВА. Technology of municipal public health service assessment. European Researcher. 2011; (11): 1554-6.
18. Yazdani S, Jadidfard MP Developing a decision support system to link health technology assessment (HTA) reports to the health system policies in Iran. Health Policy Plan. 2017; 32 (4): 504-15. DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czw160
19. Yudin VI, Shirokova OV. Prospects and role of digital technologies in Russian healthcare reforming. City Healthcare Journal. 2020; 1 (1): 72-86. DOI: 10.47619/2713-2617.zm.2020. v1 И ;72-86
20. Sidelnikov SA. Scientific substantiation of intersectoral interaction on issues of public health protection at the regional level. Under total, ed. NG Korchever. Saratov: Saratov Medical University Publishing House, 2018; 252 p.
21. On the Fundamentals of Health Protection of Citizens in the Russian Federation: Federal Law of 21.11.2011 No323-FZ. URL: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_1
21895/?ysclid=lnpr8tqu7n353417941 (25 Jan 2023)
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| 2023_03_284-289.pdf | 867.28 KB |




