Saratov JOURNAL of Medical and Scientific Research

Accommodation disorders in patients with visually intensive labor before LASIK in myopia (clinical cases)

Year: 2023, volume 19 Issue: №2 Pages: 125-127
Heading: Ophthalmology Article type: Case report
Authors: Belikova E.I., Gatilov D.V., Ovechkin I.G., Eskina E.N., Yudin V.Ye.
Organization: Academy of Postgraduate Education under the Federal Scientific and Clinical Center of the Federal Medical Biological Agency of Russia, Moscow State University of Food Production
Summary:

Laser keratomileusis in situ (LASIK) is the most common refractive surgery in young patients, the goal of which is to provide high distance vision without the use of glasses. One of the topical aspects of assessing the clinical effectiveness of LASIK is the dynamics of the accommodative function of the eye, which is a professionally significant function of the visual analyzer in patients with visually stressful work (VSW). Three clinical cases are presented, reflecting various states of accommodation (normal, habitual excessive tension of accommodation, asthenic form of accommodative asthenopia), diagnosed (based on the method of objective accommodation and the "quality of life" questionnaire "Computer visual syndrome — 22" in patients with VSW before LASIK. It was determined that that LASIK for various degrees of myopia in patients with VSW requires a comprehensive consideration from the standpoint of diagnosis and (or) correction of accommodative asthenopia based on a personalized approach that takes into account the main types of asthenopia. Correct diagnostics provides adequate treatment from the standpoint of choosing both the actual method (physical factor) and the required optical, amplitude and time parameters of exposure.

Bibliography:
1. Taneri S, Knepper J, Rost A, et al. PRK, LASIK, SMILE im Langzeitverlauf [Long-term outcomes of PRK, LASIK and SMILE]. Ophthalmologe. 2022; 119 (2): 163-9. German. DOI: 10.1007/S00347-021 -01449-7.
2. Ang M, Gatinel D, Reinstein DZ, et al. Refractive surgery beyond 2020. Eye (Lond). 2021; 35 (2): 362-82. DOI: 10.1038/S41433-020-1096-5.
3. Dessie A, Adan F, Nega A, et al. Computer vision syndrome and associated factors among computer users in Debre Tabor town, Northwest Ethiopia. J Environ Public Health. 2018; 9 (16): 1-8. DOI: 10.1155/2018/4107590.
4. Munshi S, Varghese A, Dhar-Munshi S. Computer vision syndrome-A common cause of unexplained visual symptoms in the modern era. Int J Clin Pract. 2017; 71 (7): e12962. DOI: 10.1111/ijcp. 12962.
5. Garcia-Montero M, Albarran Diego C, Garzon-Jimenez N, et al. Binocular vision alterations after refractive and cataract surgery: A review. Acta Ophthalmol. 2019; 97 (2): e145-55. DOI: 10.1111/aos. 13891.
6. Proskurina OV, Tarutta EP, lomdina EN, et al. A modern classification of asthenopias: clinical forms and stages. Russian Ophthalmological Journal. 2016; 9 (4): 69-73.
7. Ovechkin IG, Gadzhiev IS, Kozhukhov AA, Belikova El. Diagnostic criteria for asthenic accommodative asthenopia in patients with computer vision syndrome. Russian Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology. 2020; 20 (4): 169-74. DOI: 10.3236 4/2311 -7729-2020-20-4-169-174.
8. Kovrigina El. Scientific substantiation, development and evaluation of the clinical and diagnostic effectiveness of the methodology for studying the «quality of life» of a patient with symptoms of computer visual syndrome. PhD abstract. Moscow, 2022; 19 p.
9. Schukin SYu. Development of a complex system of measures to improve the functional and subjective results of excimer laser correction of myopia. PhD abstract. Moscow, 2013; 38 p.
10. Gadzhiev IS. Staged optical-reflex treatment of patients with computer visual syndrome and concomitant asthenic form of accommodative asthenopia. PhD abstract. Moscow, 2021; 20 p.

AttachmentSize
2023_02_125-127.pdf578.96 KB

No votes yet