Health risk assessment among younger schoolchildren in conditions of distance learning
Year: 2022, volume 18 Issue: №3 Pages: 493-497
Heading: Тhematic supplement Article type: Original article
Authors: Petrova N.A., Yanushanets O.I.
Organization: North-West State Medical University n.a. I.I. Mechnikov, Department of Neuropathology Assistant Professor, Candidate of Medical Science
Heading: Тhematic supplement Article type: Original article
Authors: Petrova N.A., Yanushanets O.I.
Organization: North-West State Medical University n.a. I.I. Mechnikov, Department of Neuropathology Assistant Professor, Candidate of Medical Science
Summary:
Abstract. Objective: based on a hygienic assessment of the conditions and organization of distance learning, to establish the main risk factors for the health of younger students. Material and methods. 276 junior schoolchildren from St. Petersburg and the Leningrad region were examined. The study of the organization and conditions of distance learning, and the subjective assessment of well-being was carried out by the method of questioning. The study of the dynamics of the functional state of the body of schoolchildren was carried out before and afterthe lesson of the Russian language with ophthalmic non-ergonomic visual material, implemented through an electronic learning tool. Results. Thus, in the group of children, the chances and risks of a change in well-being are higher with an irrational organization of connection to the Internet (RR=1.904, OR=3.139), the development of mental fatigue is higher in schoolchildren who study in an unfavorable light environment (RR=1.809, OR= 5.125), nervous fatigue is formed more often in schoolchildren who study through non-rational electronic means (RR=3.869, OR=24.271). Conclusion. The study made it possible to establish the main risk factors that contribute to a change in the well-being and functional state of the body of younger schoolchildren when organizing distance learning — incorrect posture during training, not a rational type of electronic learning tool, not a rational type of Internet connection and not a favorable light environment in the room.
Bibliography:
1. Petkova YuR. The history of the development of distance education. The positive and negative sides of the MOOC [massive open online courses]. Successes of Modern Natural Science 2015; (3): 199-204.
2. Kuchma VR, Sukhareva LM, Khramtsov PI. Modern approaches to ensuring the hygienic safety of life of children in a hyper-information society. Issues of School and University Medicine and Health 2016; (3): 22-7.
3. Milushkina OYu, Popov VI, Skoblina NA, et al. The use of electronic devices by participants of the educational process in traditional and distance learning. Bulletin of the Russian State Medical University 2020; (3): 85-91.
4. Kuchma VR, SedovaAS, Stepanova Ml.etal. Features of life and well-being of children and adolescents studying remotely during the epidemic of a new coronavirus infection (COVID-19). Problems of School and University Medicine and Health 2020; (2): 4-23.
5. Alexandrova IE, Ayzyatova MV Functional state of the body of elementary schoolchildren when using e-learning tools. Russian Journal of Woman and Child Health 2022; 5 (2): 157-63.
6. SP 2.4.3648-20 "Sanitary and epidemiological requirements for organizations of education and training, recreation and health improvement of children and youth". URL: https:// www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/74993644/(15Aug2022).
7. SanPiN 1.2.3685-21 "Hygienic standards and requirements for ensuring the safety and (or) harmlessness of environmental factors for humans". URL: https://docs.cntd.ru/docu-ment/573500115(15 July 2022).
8. Hygienic standards and special requirements for the device, content and modes of operation in a digital educational environment in the field of general education: Guide. Moscow: National Research Center for Children's Health of the Ministry of Health of Russia, 2020; 20 p.
9. Bulycheva EV, Setko IA. Hygienic assessment of the intensity of the educational process of primary school students in the conditions of distance learning. Orenburg Medical Bulletin 2021; 2021; 9: 1 (33): 56-60.
10. Kuchma VR, Sedova AS, Sokolova SB, et al. COVID-19 pandemic in Russia: medical and social problems of the digital educational environment. National Health Care (Russia) 2021; 2 (1): 21-31.
11. Polat ES. Distance learning. Pedagogical and Information Technologies in Education 2001; (4): 1-10.
12. Shchadnaya MA. Distance learning in modern reality. Science, technology and education 2020; (5): 74-6.
13. Stepanova Ml, Sazanyuk Zl, Polenova MA, et al. The substantiation of safe conditions for the use of electronic tablets in classrooms at school. Zdorov'e Naseleniya i Sreda Obitaniya 2015; (8): 20-4.
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| 2022_03-1_493-497.pdf | 328.27 KB |
Русский
English