Saratov JOURNAL of Medical and Scientific Research
Home

Analysis of the provision of assisted reproductive technologies in the implementation of the program of state guarantees of free medical care

Year: 2022, volume 18 Issue: №2 Pages: 250-255
Heading: public health Article type: Original article
Authors: Krivolesova Т.А.
Organization: Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University
Summary:

Objective: by analyzing the results of the activities of medical organizations participating in the compulsory medical insurance system of St. Petersburg, to identify trends in the provision of medical care using in vitro fertilization (IVF) techniques within the framework of the program of state guarantees of free medical care to citizens. Material and methods. The structural component of medical organizations providing medical care using IVF techniques in St. Petersburg over the past 9 years (2013-2021), as well as the volume of medical care provided by them in dynamics over the past 5 years (2016-2020), has been studied. Results. Using the example of St. Petersburg, it was found that the increase in the number of IVF cycles carried out during the implementation of the state guarantee program over the past five years amounted to 42.7%. At the same time, uneven opportunities in carrying out this procedure for residents of different regions are noted. The growth noted in St. Petersburg medical organizations occurred due to the outstripping growth of such services provided to nonresident patients: in 2019, their growth rate compared to the level of 2016 was only 21.3% for residents of St. Petersburg and 129.1% for nonresident patients. The leading role in the growth of indicators is played by medical organizations of non-state forms of ownership, in which 66.3% of all IVF cycles are currently carried out for residents of St. Petersburg and 78.0% for nonresident patients. Conclusion. The significant role of large federal centers identified by the example of St. Petersburg in providing significant amounts of medical care using IVF to nonresident patients should be taken into account when developing regional health development programs in order to prevent restrictions on the availability of medical services for residents of St. Petersburg.

Keywords: assisted reproductive technologies, health care availability, in vitro fertilization, infertility, program of state guarantees of medical care

Bibliography:
1. Golyshkina MS, Gevorgyan MM, Nikolenko VN, et al. Female infertility as a factor of emotional disorder: the importance of psychotherapy in the treatment of infertility. Neurology Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics 2021; 13 (2): 97-103.
2. Saveleva GM, Konoplyannikov AG, Gergert EV, et al. Pregravid preparation for patients with a history of infertility and inefficacy of in vitro fertilization. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist 2019; 19 (5): 43-51.
3. Kulakov VI. New technologies and scientific priorities in obstetrics and gynecology. Gynecology 2007; 9 (1): 5-7.
4. Shestakov NV, Krikova AV, Konyshko NA, et al. Regulatory and legal aspects regulating the increase in the birth rate in the Russian Federation Vestnik Smolenskoy Gosudarstvennoy Medicinskoy Akademii. 2019; 18 (4): 155-62.
5. Popova NM, Abdullina Al, Ermolaeva NA. Statistics on the effectiveness of in vitro fertilization in Udmurtia. Synergy of Science 2018; (22): 1256-60.
6. Rastrigina OV. Development of public-private partnership in the medical services market: world and Russian practice. The Eurasian Scientific Journal 2020; (3): 49.
7. Nifantova RV. Reproductive technologies in solving infertility problems as social innovations in the healthcare system. Scholarly Notes of Transbaikal State University 2013; 4 (51): 96-100.
8. Druzhinina YF. Legal regime of the embryo in vitro. Journal of Russian Law 2017; (12): 129-40.
9. Swain J. Decisions for the IVF laboratory: comparative analysis of embryo culture incubators. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2014; (28): 535-47.
10. Kamel R. Assisted Reproductive Technology after the Birth of Louise Brown. Journal of Reproduction & Infertility 2013; 14(3): 96-109.
11. Humaidan P, Bungum M, Bungum L, et al. Effects of recombinant LH supplementation in women undergoing assisted reproduction with GnRH agonist down-regulation and stimulation with recombinant FSH: An opening study. Reprod Biomed Online 2004; 8 (6): 635-43. DOI: 10.1016/S1472-6483 (10)61643-4.
12. Zhou Z, Zheng D, Wu H, et al. Epidemiology of infertility in China: a population-based stud. BJOG 2018; 125 (4): 432-41.
13. Pavlova YV, Sergeev YD. Problems of legal regulation of the use of methods of assisted reproductive technologies. Medical Law 2006; (3): 3-9.
14. Bogdanova ЕЕ, Belova DA. Actual problems of reforming the legislation on surrogacy. Actual Problems of Russian Law 2021; 16(4): 66-75.
15. Mitrofanova IV, Lutsay ED, Sirik EN. The effectiveness of in vitro fertilization in women of different periods of adulthood in the Orenburg region. Medical Newsletter of Vyatka 2021; 1 (69): 56-9.
16. On additional measures to reduce the risks of the spread of COVID-19 in St. Petersburg: resolution of the Chief State Sanitary Doctor for the city of St. Petersburg from 23.03.2020 №3. URL: http://78.rospotrebnadzor.rU/c/document_library/get_file7uuid =36074c57-6649-41 d5-a610-b91 cb16a285c&groupld=935484 (31 March 2022).
17. On the Territorial program of state guarantees of free provision of medical care to citizens in St. Petersburg for 2022 and for the planning period of 2023 and 2024: The Law of St. Petersburg from 20.12.2021 № 618-127. URL: http://publication.pravo.gov.ru/Document/View/780020211 2220005 (31 March 2022).
18. Bazina 00, Simenyura SS. Telemedicine: advantages, shortcomings, realia (a legal analysis and practical application). Medical Law 2020; (3): 32-8.

AttachmentSize
2022_2_250-255.pdf315.5 KB
All articles of the authors: Krivolesova Т.А.

No votes yet