Saratov JOURNAL of Medical and Scientific Research
Home

Pathomorphological characteristics of the wound bed before skin autoplasty

Year: 2022, volume 18 Issue: №1 Pages: 73-77
Heading: Рathophysiology Article type: Original article
Authors: Bogdanov S.B., Melkonyan K.I., Polyakov A.V., Sotnichenko A.S., Verevkin A.A., Gilevich I.V., Aladyina V.A., Bogdanova Yu.A., Karakulev A.V., Medvedeva L.A., Porhanov V.A.
Organization: Kuban State Medical University, Research Institute — Regional Clinical Hospital No. 1 n. a. Professors. V. Ochapovsky
Summary:

Objective: to conduct a comparative pathomorphological analysis of wounds of various origins requiring full-thickness skin autoplasty. Material and methods. Histomorphological comparison of the wound bottom before plastic surgery with full-layer skin autografts was performed in those groups of patients: 1 — for excision of scar tissue in elective surgery; 2 — traumatic detachment of the skin perform plastic surgery by Krasovitov; 3 —when excising granulation tissue to the fibrous layer. The object of research is biopsies of patients from three study groups. Results. The histologi-cal picture of wounds after scar removal is characterized by well-developed dense fibrous-cellular connective tissue, has signs of chronic inflammation. Unlike a cicatricial wound, acute lesions were characterized by granulation and mature dense fibrous connective tissue, with pronounced inflammatory changes, each of which had its own characteristics. Conclusion. The results of a comparative analysis revealed the features of the morphological picture of wounds depending on the type of injury. In the group of acute injuries, traumatic and burn wounds, the most pronounced tissue injuries were revealed. Given the data obtained, it should be assumed that full-thickness autodermoplasty will have the best result in the group of patients after planned excision of scar tissue.

Keywords: autodermoplasty, burns, granulating wound, skin detachment

Bibliography:
1. Salamone JC, Salamone AB Swindle-Reilly K, et al. Grand challenge in Biomaterials: wound healing. Regen Bioma-ter2016;(3): 127-8.
2. Andreev SV. Modeling of diseases. Moscow: Medicine, 1973; 336 p.
3. Shevchenko RV, James SE, Reed MJ, et al. Pork experimental model as an effective tool for transferring scientific knowledge to the clinic to replenish the combustiologist's arsenal. Combustiology 2007; (30). URL: http://combustiolog.ru/jour-nal/svinaya-e-ksperimental-naya-model-kak-e-ffektivny-j-instru-ment-perenosa-nauchny-h-znanij-v-kliniku-dlya-popolneniya-ar-senala-kombustiologa/(15 Feb 2022).
4. Burd A, Ahmed К, Lam S, et al. Stem cell strategies in burns care Burns 2007; 33 (3): 282-91.
5. Chua AWC, Khoo YC, Tan BK, et al. Skin tissue engineering advances in severe burns: review and therapeutic applications. Burns Trauma 2016; 4 (1): 3.
6. Climov M, Medeiros E, Farkash EA, et al. Bioengineered self-assembled skin as an alternative to skin grafts. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open 2016; 4 (6): e731.
7. Keck M, Haluza D, Lumenta DB, et al. Construction of a multi-layer skin substitute: simultaneous cultivation of keratino-cytes and preadipocytes on a dermal template. Burns 2011; 37 (4): 626-30.
8. Leclerc T, Thepenier C, Jault P, et al. Cell therapy of burns. Cell Proliferation 2011; (44): 48-54.
9. Wormald JC, Fishman JM, Juniat S. Regenerative medicine in otorhinolaryngology. J Laryngol Otol 2015; 129 (8): 732-9.
10. BogdanovSB, Gilevich IV, Fedorenko TV, et al. Cell therapy application in skin grafting surgery. Innovative Medicine of Kuban 2018; (3): 16-21.
11. Bogdanov SB, Kurinniy NA, Polyakov AV, et al. Method of skin plasty after early necrectomy. Patent for invention RU 2295924 C, 27.03.2007. Application №2005123211 dated 21.07.2005.
12. Slavinsky АА, Verevkin АА, Sotnichenko AS, et al. Immunohistochemical profile of mononuclear infiltrate in the myocardium of transplanted heart. Computer mor-phometry data. Kuban Scientific Medical Bulletin 2020; 27 (2): 92-101.
13. Grellner W, Madea В. Demands on scientific studies: vitality of wounds and wound age estimation. Forensic Sci Int 2007; 165(2-3): 150-4.
14. Velnar T, Bailey T, Smrkolj V The wound healing process: an overview of the cellular and molecular mechanisms. J Int Med Res 2009; 37: 1528-42.
15. Delavary BM, van der Veer WM, van Egmond M, et al. Macrophages in skin injury and repair. Immunobiology. Elsevier GmbH 2011; 216 (7): 753-62.
16. Demidova-Rice TN, Durham JT, Herman IM. Wound healing angiogenesis: innovations and challenges in acute and chronic wound healing. Adv Wound Care 2012; (1): 17-22.
17. Pober JS, Tellides G. Participation of blood vessel cells in human adaptive immune responses. Trends Immunol 2012; (33): 49-57.
18. Landen NX, Li D, Stahle M. Transition from inflammation to proliferation: a critical step during wound healing. Cell Mol Life Sci 2016; (73): 3861-85.

AttachmentSize
2022_01_073-077.pdf1.65 MB
All articles of the authors: Alad'ina V.A. , Bogdanova Yu.A. , Gilevich I. V. , Karakulev A. V. , Medvedeva L.A., Melkonyan K.I. , Polyakov A.V., Porkhanov V.A., Sotnichenko A. S. , Verevkin A.A.

No votes yet