Saratov JOURNAL of Medical and Scientific Research

Diagnostic aspects of duplex sonography of cerebrovascular diseases (review)

Year: 2022, volume 18 Issue: №1 Pages: 160-165
Heading: Тhematic supplement Article type: Review
Authors: Yudina V.V.
Organization: Saratov State Medical University

Objective: to consider the clinical experience of duplex sonography in the diagnosis of brachiocephalic arterial pathology and to summarize the reference values of ultrasound markers of cerebrovascular disease (CVD). A systematic search of the scientific literature was performed in the PubMed, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global, and ProQuest Ebook Central databases from 1983 to the present, and included 47 relevant sources. The following search terms were formulated: "vascular neurology", "noninvasive diagnostics of CVD", "duplex sonography of head and neck vessels", "stenoocclusive lesions of cerebral arteries". Duplex scanning is an integral part of the diagnostic algorithm of screening and expert evaluation of pathological changes in CVD, which contributes to the personalization of diagnosis and treatment, significantly improving the results of primary and secondary prevention of ischemic events.

1. Call for proposals for multinational and translational research projects on cerebrovascular diseases including small vessels and brain barriers dysfunction. ERA-NET Neuron 2022 [Call text of the 2022 "Cerebrovascular Diseases" call]. 2022. URL: JTC_2022. pdf (1 Mar 2022).
2. Owolabi MO, Thrift AG, Mahal A, et al. Primary stroke prevention worldwide: translating evidence into action. Lancet Public Health 2022; 7 (1): e74-e85. DOI: 10.1016/S2468-2667 (21 )002309.
3. Feigin VL, Brainin M, Norrving B, et al. World Stroke Organization (WSO): Global Stroke Fact Sheet 2022. Int J Stroke 2022; 17 (1): 18-29. DOI: 10.1177/17474930211065917.
4. Kontsevaya AV, Drapkina OM, Balanova YA, et al. Economic burden of cardiovascular diseases in the Russian Federation in 2016. Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology 2018; 14(2): 156-66. DOI: 10.20996/1819-6446-2018-14-2-156 -166.
5. AbuRahma AF, Perler ВА, eds. Noninvasive vascular diagnosis: A practical textbook for clinicians. 5th ed. N. Y: Springer Nature Switzerland AG, 2022; p. vii.
6. Russian clinical guidelines for surgical treatment of stenosing lesions of the main arteries of the brain in a neurosurgical hospital. Moscow: Association of Neurosurgeons of Russia, 2014. 32 p.
7. Simon RP, Aminoff MJ, Greenberg DA, eds. Clinical Neurology. 10th ed. N. Y: McGraw-Hill Education, 2018; p. 369-405.
8. DanilovaMA, BaidinaTV, KarakulovaYV, etal. Pathologic carotid arteries tortuosity. Perm Medical J 2018; 35 (6): 82-8. DOI: 10.17816/pmj35682-88.
9. Valdueza J, Schreiber S, Roehl JE, et al. Neurosonology and neuroimaging of stroke: a comprehensive reference. 2nd ed. N. Y: Thieme Medical Publishers, 2017; 630 p.
10. Fomkina OA, Ivanov DV, Kirillova IV, Nikolenko VN. Biomechanical modelling of cerebral arteries at different variants of configuration of intracranial arteries of vertebrobasilar system. Saratov Journal of Medical Scientific Research 2016; 12 (2): 118-27.
11. Nikolenko VN, Fomkina OA, Gladilin YuA. Age, sex and bilateral features of lumen diameter and wall thickness of vertebral arteries in adults. Morphology 2008; 133 (3): 79-80.
12. Nichols WW, O'Rourke М, Vlachopoulos С, eds. McDonald's blood flow in arteries: theoretical, experimental and clinical principles. 6th ed. L: CRC Press, 2011; 768 p.
13. Hoskins PR, Fleming A, Stonebridge P, et al. Scan-plane vector maps and secondary flow motions in arteries. Eur J Ultrasound 1994; (1): 159-60.
14. Stonebridge PA, Hoskins PR, Allan PL, Belch JF. Spiral laminar flow in vivo. Clin Sci (Lond). 1996; 91 (1): 17-21. DOI: 10.1042/cs0910017.
15. Pozniak MA, Allan PL, eds. Clinical Doppler Ultrasound. 3rd ed. L.: Churchill Livingstone/Elsevier, 2014; 400 p.
16. Nitya KN, Doshi D, Kulkarni S, et al. Assessment of periodontal status based on carotid artery intima media thickness. Oral Health Prev Dent 2020; 18(1): 511-9. DOI: 10.3290/j.ohpd. a44036.
17. Chambless LE, Zhong MM, Arnett D, et al. Variability in B-mode ultrasound measurements in the atherosclerosis risk in communities (ARIC) study. Ultrasound Med Biol 1996; 22 (5): 545-54. DOI: 10.1016/0301-5629(96)00039-7.
18. Bots ML, Hoes AW, Koudstaal PJ, et al. Common carotid intima-media thickness and risk of stroke and myocardial infarction: the Rotterdam Study. Circulation 1997; 96 (5): 1432-7. DOI: 10.1161 /01 .cir.96.5.1432.
19. Polak JF, Pencina MJ, Pencina KM, et al. Carotid-wall intima-media thickness and cardiovascular events. N Engl J Med 2011; 365(3): 213-21. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1012592.
20. Lorenz MW, Markus HS, Bots ML, et al. Prediction of clinical cardiovascular events with carotid intima-media thickness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Circulation 2007; 115 (4): 459-67. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.628875.
21. Naqvi TZ, Lee MS. Carotid intima-media thickness and plaque in cardiovascular risk assessment. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2014; 7 (10): 1025-38. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg. 2013.11.014.
22. Imparato AM, Riles TS, Mintzer R, Baumann FG. The importance of hemorrhage in the relationship between gross morphologic characteristics and cerebral symptoms in 376 carotid artery plaques. Ann Surg 1983; 197 (2): 195-203. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-198302000-00012.
23. Hennerici M, Rautenberg W, Trockel U, Kladetzky RG. Spontaneous progression and regression of small carotid atheroma. Lancet 1985; 1 (8443): 1415-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(85)91845-8.
24. liji O, Matsumoto M, Handa N, et al. Frequency of carotid ulcerated plaques and its relationship to artery-to-artery embolism. Cerebrovasc Dis 1996; 6 (suppl. 2): 33. DOI: 10.1159/000108073.
25. Bluth El. Evaluation and charact
erization of carotid plaque. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 1997; 18 (1): 57-65. DOI: 10.1016/S0887-2171 (97)90038-x. 26. Redgrave JNE.LovettJK, Gallagher PJ.etal. Histological assessment of 526 symptomatic carotid plaques in relation to the nature and timing of ischemic symptoms: the Oxford Plaque Study. Circulation 2006; 113 (19): 2320-8. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCU LATIONAHA.105.589044.
27. Sterpetti AV, Schultz RD, Feldhaus RJ, et al. Ultrasonographic features of carotid plaque and the risk of subsequent neurologic deficits. Surgery 1988; 104 (4): 652-60.
28. Sterpetti AV, Hunter WJ, Schultz RD. Importance of ulceration of carotid plaque in determining symptoms of cerebral ischemia. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 1991; 32 (2): 154-8.
29. Perez-Burkhardt JL, Gonzalez-Fajardo JA, Rodriguez E, et al. Amaurosis fugax as a symptom of carotid artery stenosis. Its relationship with ulcerated plaque. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 1994; 35(1): 15-8.
30. Naghavi M, Libby P, Falk E, et al. From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: a call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: Part I. Circulation 2003; 108 (14): 1664-72. DOI: 10.1161/01 .CIR.0000087480.94275.97. PMID: 14530185.
31. Nicolaides AN, Kakkos SK, Kyriacou E, et al. Asymptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis and cerebrovascular risk stratification. J Vase Surg 2010; 52 (6): 1486-96; e1-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.07.021.
32. Topakian R, King A, Kwon SU, et al. Ultrasonic plaque echolucency and emboli signals predict stroke in asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Neurology 2011; 77 (8): 751-8. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31822b00a6.
33. Nairn C, Douziech M, Therasse E, et al. Vulnerable atherosclerotic carotid plaque evaluation by ultrasound, computed tomography angiography, and magnetic resonance imaging: an overview. Can Assoc Radiol J 2014; 65 (3): 275-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.carj.2013.05.003.
34. Delcker A, Diener HC, Wilhelm H. Influence of vascular risk factors for atherosclerotic carotid artery plaque progression. Stroke 1995; 26(11): 2016-22. DOI: 10.1161/01 .str.26.11.2016. PMID: 7482641. 35. Kardoulas DG, Katsamouris AN, Gallis PT, et al. Ultrasonographic and histologic c
haracteristics of symptom-free and symptomatic carotid plaque. Cardiovasc Surg 1996; 4 (5): 580-90. DOI: 10.1016/0967-2109(96)00030-0.
36. Virmani R, Kolodgie FD, Burke AP, et al. Lessons from sudden coronary death: a comprehensive morphological classification scheme for atherosclerotic lesions. Arterioscler Thromb Vase Biol 2000; 20 (5): 1262-75. DOI: 10.1161/01 .atv. 20.5.1262.
37. Fisher M, Paganini-Hill A, Martin A, et al. Carotid plaque pathology: thrombosis, ulceration, and stroke pathogenesis. Stroke 2005; 36 (2): 253-7. DOI: 10.1161/01.STR. 0000152336. 71224.21.
38. Loree HM, Kamm RD, Stringfellow RG, et al. Effects of fibrous cap thickness on peak circumferential stress in model atherosclerotic vessels. Circ Res 1992; 71 (4): 850-8. DOI: 10.1161/01 .res.71.4.850.
39. Fabris F, Zanocchi M, Bo M, et al. Carotid plaque, aging, and risk factors. A study of 457 subjects. Stroke 1994; 25 (6): 1133-40. DOI: 10.1161 /01 str.25.6.1133.
40. Siebler M, Kleinschmidt A, Sitzer M, et al. Cerebral microembolism in symptomatic and asymptomatic high-grade internal carotid artery stenosis. Neurology 1994; 44 (4): 615-8. DOI: 10.1212/wnl.44.4.615.
41. Vereshchagin N.V., Morgunov V.A., Gulevskaya T.S. Brain changes in atherosclerosis and arterial hypertension. Moscow: Medicine, 1997; 288 p.
42. Geroulakos G, Ramaswami G, Nicolaides A, et al. Characterization of symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid plaques using high-resolution real-time ultrasonography. Br J Surg 1993; 80 (10): 1274-7. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800801016.
43. Comerota AJ, Katz ML, White JV, et al. The preoperative diagnosis of the ulcerated carotid atheroma. J Vase Surg 1990; 11 (4): 505-10.
44. Troyer A, Saloner D, Pan XM, et al. Assessment of carotid stenosis by comparison with endarterectomy plaque trial investigators. Major carotid plaque surface irregularities correlate with neurologic symptoms. J Vase Surg 2002; 35 (4): 741-7. DOI: 10.1067/mva.2002.121210.
45. Staub D, Partovi S, Schinkel AF, et al. Correlation of carotid artery atherosclerotic lesion echogenicity and severity at standard US with intraplaque neovascularization detected at contrast-enhanced US. Radiology 2011; 258 (2): 618-26. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.10101008.
46. Holdsworth RJ, McCollum PT, Bryce JS, et al. Symptoms, stenosis and carotid plaque morphology. Is plaque morphology relevant? Eur J Vase Endovasc Surg 1995; 9 (1): 80-5. DOI: 10.1016/s1078-5884(05)80229-1.
47. Lelyuk VH, Lelyuk SE. Ultrasound angiology. Moscow: Real Time, 2007; 398 p.

2022_01-1_160-165.pdf317.12 KB

No votes yet