Experience of surgical treatment of recurrent macular rupture developed in post-operation period
Year: 2021, volume 17 Issue: №2 Pages: 400-402
Heading: Тhematic supplement Article type: Original article
Authors: Chuprov A.D., Kazennov A.N., Bazhitova E.A.
Organization: The S. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution
Heading: Тhematic supplement Article type: Original article
Authors: Chuprov A.D., Kazennov A.N., Bazhitova E.A.
Organization: The S. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution
Summary:
Purpose: evaluate the effectiveness of surgical treatment of recurrent operated macular rupture. Material and Methods. The study included 10 patients (10 eyes) with recurrent macular rupture. In 8 out of 10 cases, the macular hole was closed using the inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique; in 2 cases — using mechanical convergence of the edges of the rupture. Preoperative vision varied from 0.05 to 0.1-0.2. According to optical coherent tomography, the average rupture diameter ranged from 600 to 800 urn and in one case was 1144 urn. Results. In all cases, an anatomical result was obtained. During ILM application, the most effective anatomical result was obtained in 5 cases with preservation of the neuroepithelium; in 2 cases the retina in the fovea was thinned. In these cases, there was an improvement in visual functions 1-3 months after the surgery. In 3 cases, there was an incomplete closure of the macular hole. In 1 case, the defect remained at the level of ellipsoid zone of retinal photoreceptors; in 2 cases, there was a deformation of the retinal fovea with the destruction of photoreceptor ellipsoid zone. Visual functions remained unchanged. Conclusion. The use of the described inverted ILM flap technique in surgery of recurrent operated macular rupture serves to increase the effectiveness of treatment.
Bibliography:
1. Zhigulin AV, Khudyakov AYu, Lebedev YaB, Mashchenko NV. The effectiveness of silicone tamponade in the surgical treatment of large macular ruptures. Fyodorov Journal of Ophthalmic Surgery 2013; (1): 6-8.
2. Ivanov SV, Gilyazev RM, Konovalov ME, Zenina ML. First experience of using platelet-rich autoplasma (PRP) in macular rupture surgery. Point of View: East — West 2017; (2): 95-7.
3. Zakharov VD, Kislitsyna NM, Kolesnik SV, et al. Modern approaches to surgical treatment of large-diameter perforating idiopathic macular tears (literature review). Practical Medicine 2018; 114 (3): 64-8.
4. Michalewska Z, Michalewski J, Adelman R, Nawrocki J. Inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique for large macular holes. Ophthalmology 2010; 117 (10): 2018-25.
5. Method for surgical treatment of penetrating idiopathic macular rupture: RF patent No. 2395255; dated 07/27/2010/Belyy YuA, Tereshchenko AV.
6. Petrachkov DV, Zamytskiy PA, Zolotarev AV. The role of convergence of the edges of the through macular rupture when using the inverted flap technique. Modern Technologies in Ophthalmology 2017; (1): 221-5.
7. Bibkov MM, Altynbaev UR, Gilmanshin TR. Selecting the method of intraoperative closing of large idiopathic macular hole. Fyodorov Journal of Ophthalmic Surgery 2010; (1): 25-8.
8. Alpatov SA, Shchuko AG, Malyshev VV Pathogenesis and treatment of idiopathic macular ruptures. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 2005; 192 p.
9. Takhchidi KhP, Shkvorchenko DO, Sharafetdinov IKh. Features of macular tear surgery. In: Makula-2006: Proceedings of the 2nd All-Russian seminar — "round table". Rostov-on-Don, 2006; p. 177-9.
10. Arsyutov DG. Surgical tactics in the treatment of large and giant macular ruptures. Modern Technologies in Ophthalmology 2015; (1): 19-20.
11. Konovalov ME, KozhukhovAA, Zenina ML, GorenskiyAA. Re-closure of unclosed macular ruptures. Modern Technologies in Ophthalmology 2016; (1): 115.
12. Tereshchenko AV, Trifanenkova IG, Shilov NM, et al. Repeated surgical closure of the macular tears using the "free flap" technique of the internal border membrane. Tambov University Reports. Series: Natural and Technical Sciences 2017; 22 (4): 727-33.
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| 2021_02-1_400-402.pdf | 602.23 KB |
Русский
English