Saratov JOURNAL of Medical and Scientific Research

Isokinetic dynamometry in the diagnosis and rehabilitation of patients with motor disorders (review)

Year: 2021, volume 17 Issue: №2 Pages: 177-182
Heading: Neurology Article type: Review
Authors: Shatokhin А.А., Vyshlova I.A., Bazhanov S.P., Kuzyuberdin A.V., Karpov S.M.
Organization: Saratov State Medical University, Stavropol State Medical University
Summary:

An overview of the literature data for the last 40 years (from 1984 to 2020) is presented, dedicated to the study of possibilities of using the isokinetic dynamometry method in the diagnosis and rehabilitation of patients with motor disorders in various diseases and pathological conditions (31 sources). To search for information, the Internet resources eLibrary and PubMed and scientific literature of the library of the Stavropol State Medical University were used. The article highlights the possibilities of the isokinetic dynamometry method for an objective assessment of the functional state of skeletal muscles in health and disease. The characteristics of rehabilitation measures using isokinetic dynamometry devices in patients with pathology of the knee and hip joints are given. Information on the effectiveness, safety and application possibilities of this technique in various fields of medicine is presented. Based on the review, it was concluded that it is rational to use the isokinetic dynamometry method in the complex of diagnostic and rehabilitation treatment for patients with compression radiculopathy.

Bibliography:
1. Chamorro С, Armijo-Olivo S, De la Fuente C, et al. Absolute reliability and concurrent validity of hand held dynamometry and isokinetic dynamometry in the hip, knee and ankle joint: systematic review and meta-analysis. Open Med (Wars) 2017; (12): 359-75.
2. Li RC, Jasiewicz JM, Middleton J, et al. The development, validity, and reliability of a manual muscle testing device with integrated limb position sensors. Arch of Phys Med Rehabil 2006; (87): 411-7.
3. Walmsley RP, Letts G, Vooys J. A comparison of torque generated by knee extension with a maximal voluntary contraction vis-a-vis electrical stimulation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther1984;(6): 10-7.
4. Stark T, Walker B, Phillips JK, et al. Hand-held dynamometry correlation with the gold standard isokinetic dynamometry: a systematic review. PM R 2011; 3 (5): 472-9.
5. Grimshaw P, Lees A, Fowler N, et al. Sports & exercise biomechanics. Taylor & Francis Gr, 2006; 392 p.
6. Perrin DH. Open chain isokinetic assessment and exercise of the knee. J Sport Rehabil 1994; (3): 245-54.
7. Habets B, Staal JB, Tijssen M, et al. Intrarater reliability of the Humac NORM isokinetic dynamometer for strength measurements of the knee and shoulder muscles. ВМС Res Notes 2018; 11 (1): 15.
8. Keskula DR, Duncan JB, Davis VL, et al. Functional outcome measures for knee dysfunction assessement. J of Athl Train 1996; 31 (2): 105-10.
9. Ushiyama N, Kurobe Y, Momose K. Validity of maximal isometric knee extension strength measurements obtained via belt-stabilized hand-held dynamometry in healthy adults. J Phys Ther Sci 2017; 29 (11): 1987-92.
10. van Cingel R, Habets B, Willemsen L, et al. Shoulder Dynamic Control Ratio and Rotation Range of Motion in Female Junior Elite Handball Players and Controls. Clin J Sport Med; 28 (2): 153-8.
11. Chester R, Costa ML, Shepstone L, et al. Reliability of isokinetic dynamometry in assessing plantarflexion torque following Achilles tendon rupture. Foot Ankle Int 2003; 24 (12): 909-15.
12. Bores JM, Murton AJ, Glover SQ, et al. Use of isokinetic dynamometry to assess muscle function in burned patients is a reliable tool to assist progressive resistance exercise prescription. J Burn Care Res 2019 Jan 9. DOI: 10.1093/jbcr/irz003.
13. Klassen O, Schmidt ME, Ulrich CM, et al. Muscle strength in breast cancer patients receiving different treatment regimes. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2017; 8 (2): 305-16.
14. Stewart S, Mawston G, Davidtz L, et al. Foot and ankle muscle strength in people with gout: A two-arm cross-sectional study. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2016; (32): 207-11.
15. Adsuar JC, Olivares PR, del Pozo-Cruz B, et al. Test-retest reliability of isometric and isokinetic knee extension and flexion in patients with fibromyalgia: evaluation of the smallest real difference. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011; 92 (10): 1646-51.
16. Lopes AJ, Ferreira AS, Walchan EM, et al. Explanatory models of muscle performance in acromegaly patients evaluated by knee isokinetic dynamometry: Implications for rehabilitation. Hum Mov Sci 2016; (49): 160-9.
17. Jorgensen M, Dalgas U, Wens I, et al. Muscle strength and power in persons with multiple sclerosis — a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol Sci 2017; (376): 225-41.
18. Kristensen OH, Stenager E, Dalgas U. Muscle strength and poststroke hemiplegia: a systematic review of muscle strength assessment and muscle strength impairment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2017; 98 (2): 368-80.
19. Salehi Dehno N, Sarvestani FK, Shariat A, et al. Test-retest reliability and responsiveness of isokinetic dynamometry to assess wrist flexor muscle spasticity in subacute post-stroke hemiparesis. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2020; 24 (3): 38-43.
20. El Mhandi L, Bethoux F. Isokinetic testing in patients with neuromuscular diseases: a focused review. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2013; 92 (2): 163-78.
21. Cano-de-la-Cuerda R, Vela-Desojo L, Miangolarra-Page JC, et al. Isokinetic dynamometry as a technologic assessment tool for trunk rigidity in Parkinson's disease patients. NeuroRehabilitation 2014; 35 (3): 493-501.
22. Orri JC, Darden GF. Technical report: reliability and validity of the iSAM 9000 isokinetic dynamometer. J Strength Cond Res 2008; 22 (1): 310-7.
23. Maffiuletti NA, Bizzini M, Desbrosses K, et al. Reliability of knee extension and flexion measurements using the Con-Trex isokinetic dynamometer. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 2007; 27 (6): 346-53.
24. Zubavlenko RA, Ulyanov VYu, Belova SV. Pathogenic peculiarities of post-traumatic knee osteoarthrosis: analysis of diagnostic and therapeutic strategies (review). Saratov Journal of Medical Scientific Research 2020; 16 (1): 50-4.
25. Vyshlova IA. Complex treatment of patients with chronic vertebrogenic pain syndromes. Kuban Scientific Medical Bulletin 2012; (2): 47-9.
26. Arkov VV, Milenin ON, Ordzhonikidze ZG. Isokinetic dynamometer indicators of thigh muscle in athletes after reconstrucrion of anterior cruciate ligament of knee joint. Exercise therapy and Sports Medicine 2011; 12 (96): 33-6.
27. Chekeres РР, Budashkina MV, Mukhanov VV, et al. Insufficiency of proprioceptive control after plastic of the acl as the reasonfor knee re-injury in professional athletes. Clinical practice 2015; (3-4): 95-8.
28. OMalley Е, Richter С, King Е, et al. Countermovement jump and isokinetic dynamometry as measures of rehabilitation status after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Athl Train 2018; 53 (7): 687-95.
29. Hickey JT, Timmins RG, Maniar N, et al. Criteria for progressing rehabilitation and determining return-to-play clearance following hamstring strain injury: a systematic review. Sports Med 2017; 47 (7): 1375-87.
30. Vidmar MF, Baroni BM, Michelin AF, et al. Isokinetic eccentric training is more effective than constant load eccentric training for quadriceps rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized controlled trial. Braz J Phys Ther 2020; 24 (5): 424-32.
31. Discogenic lumbosacral radiculopathy: Recommendations of the Russian Association for the Study of Pain. 2020. URL: https://painrussia.ru/KP_%20flncK_PaflHK_ РОИБ_2020_финал%20 (1).pdf (1 February 2021).

AttachmentSize
2021_02_177-182.pdf325.48 KB

No votes yet