Saratov JOURNAL of Medical and Scientific Research

Risks of trust in the institute of medicine in conditions of digital health: theoretical analysis and management practice

Year: 2020, volume 16 Issue: №1 Pages: 94-98
Heading: Sociology of Medicine Article type: Original article
Authors: Fedonnikov A.S., Andriyanova Е.А.
Organization: Saratov State Medical University

Aim: to analyze the trust risks structure in medicine and healthcare and to study of the possibilities of online communication in healthcare for managing these risks. Material and Methods. The methodological basis of risk analysis of trust in the institute of medicine was the theory of social trust (Luhmann N., 1988). The study used methods of a systematic approach, structural and functional analysis and typologization. An empirical analysis of the problem of trust in the dyad «patient-medical specialist» carried out in 2018-2019 at the Research Institute of Traumatology, Orthopedics and Neurosurgery of Saratov State Medical University n. a. V. I. Razumovsky using the developed and introduced into practice System of interactive monitoring and feedback (SIMF), which allows to improve the quality of management of patient' preparation for the upcoming high-tech operation and the subsequent process of medical rehabilitation of patients (N=381). Result. It has been developed a theoretic model for the treatment of trust risks in healthcare in relation to medical rehabilitation, which is the basis for development practical tools for the prevention of medical, social and socio-psychological risks based on SIMR Conclusion. The use of online communication services increases the effectiveness of medical and rehabilitation measures based on a personalized approach; expands the ability to manage the interaction of patients and medical professionals through the prevention of trust risks in the institute of medicine.

1. Nerdrum P, Geirdal АО. Psychological Distress among Young Norwegian Health Professionals. Professions and Professionalism 2014; 4 (1).
2. Goold SD. Money and trust: relationships between patients, physicians, and health plans. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 1998; 23: 687-95.
3. Luhmann N. Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations. Familiarity, Confidence, Trust: Problems and Alternatives. New York: Basil Blackwell, 1988; p. 94-107.
4. Pearson S, Crane S, Mont MC. Persistent and Dynamic Trust: Analysis of Trust Properties and Related Impact of Trusted Platforms. In: Trust Management. Bristol: Springer Berlin, 2005; p. 355-63.
5. Mechanic D. Changing medical organizations and the erosion of trust. Milbank Quarterly 1996; 74 (2): 171-89.
6. Mechanic D. Functions and limits of trust in providing medical care. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 1998; 23 (4): 661-86.
7. Mechanic D, Meyer S. Concepts of trust among patients with serious illness. Social Science and Medicine 2000; 51: 657-68.
8. Perry H, Robison N, Chavez D, et al. Attaining health for all through community partnership: principles of the census-based, impactoriented (CBIO) approach to primary health care developed in Bolivia, South America. Social Science and Medicine 1999; 48 (8): 1053-68.
9. Fedonnikov AS. Interactive medical and social online communication based service: design and development experience. ORGZDRAV: novosti, mneniya, obuchenie. Vestnik VSHOUZ 2019; 5 (1): 58-68.
10. Chegurov OK, Kolesnikov SV, Kolesnikova ES, Skripnikov AA. Assessment of functional status in patients with different etiopathogenetic variants of stage III coxarthrosis. Orthopaedic Genius 2013; (4): 44-7.
11. Suler J. Psychotherapy in Cyberspace: A5-dimension model of online and computer-mediated psychotherapy, 2003. URL. html (available at 11.11.2019).
12. Ahern MM, Hendryx MS. Social capital and trust in providers. Social Science and Medicine 2003; 57: 1195-203.
13. Crawford R. Healthism and the medicalization of everyday life. International Journal of Health Services 1980; 10 (3): 365-88.
14. Mechanic D. Issues in promoting health. Social Science and Medicine 1999; 48: 711-8.
15. DiMaggio P, Hargittai E. From the "digital divide" to "digital inequality": Studying Internet use as penetration increases, 2005. URL: sources/Dimaggio_Digital_Divide. pdf (available at 11.11.2019).

2020_01_094-098.pdf771.53 KB

No votes yet