Application of external fixation devices for fractures of the femur in modern practice
Heading: Traumatology and Orthopedics Article type: Original article
Authors: Ямщиков О.Н., Марков Д.А., Емельянов С.А.
Organization: Saratov State Medical University, Tambov State University n. a. G.R. Derzhavin
Diaphyseal fractures of the femur are rather common. In the treatment of fractures of the femur various methods of osteosynthesis can be used: intramedullary, of plate, transosseus. In our country external fixation using external fixation devices has traditionally been popular. Objective. The analysis of the frequency of use of transosseous osteosynthesis in the treatment of fractures of the femur and the identification of the most common indications for the use of the method in the present practice. Materials and Methods. The analysis of the structure of external fixation in fractures of the femur, on the experience of treatment of 126 patients with diaphyseal fractures of the femur. Results. The results of the study revealed that the structure of the osteosynthesis of fractures of the femur transosseous osteosynthesis with the use of external fixation devices is not considered to be common and is used as an alternative method of treatment. Conclusion. The treatment of fractures of the femur using transosseous osteosynthesis is currently used mostly for open, comminuted fractures and revision osteosynthesis, as well as a high risk of infectious complications in the zone of fracture, due to complexity of the method, the lowest strength of fixation and a relatively high percentage of non-specific complications.
Bibliography:
1. Li AD. Chreskostnyj osteosintez v travmatologii. Tomsk, 2002; 198 p.
2. Ankin LN, Ankin NL. Travmatologija (Evrope-jskie standarty). M., 2005; 373 p.
3. Bejdik OV, Kotel'nikov GP, Ostrovskij NV. Osteosintez sterzhnevymi i spicesterzhnevymi apparatami vneshnej fiksacii. Samara, 2002; 234 p.
4. Kljuchevskij VV, Smetanin SM, Solov'ev IN, et al. Treatment of open femur fractures using internal osteosintesis. Travmatologiya i ortopediya Rossii 2010; (4): 66-69
5. Tjuljaev NV, Voroncova TN, Solomin LN, Skomorosh-ko PV. Development history and modern concern of problem of extremity injuries by external fixation. Travmatologiya i ortopediya Rossii 2011; (2): 179-190
6. Markov DA, Levchenko КК, Morozov VP, et al. Biome-chanical Basis of External Fixation in Patients with Femur Fractures. Saratov Journal of Medical Scientific Research 2009; 5 (4): 591-593
7. Kaplunov ОА. Chreskostnyj osteosintez ро llizarovu v travmatologii i ortopedii. M.: GJeOTAR-MED, 2002; 304 p.
8. Kaplunov AG, BarabashAP, Norkini IA, etal. Klassika i novacii chreskostnogo osteosinteza v ortopedii. Saratov: «Novyj veter», 2007; 312 p.
9. Kataev IA, Lobko AJ, Chernysh VJ, et al. Vybor meto-da lechenija zakrytyh diafizarnyh perelomov bedrennoj kosti. Ortoped.,travmatol. 1998; (2): 53-55
10. Bejdik OV, Kireev SI, Levchenko KK, et al. Profilaktika i lechenie posttravmaticheskoj nejropatii malobercovogo nerva pri chreskostnom osteosinteze perelomov kostej goleni. In: Sovre-mennye tehnologii diagnostic, lechenija i reabilitacii bol'nyh s zabolevanijami i povrezhdenijami pozvonochnika, spinnogo mozga i perifericheskoj nervnoj sistemy: Mat. Ros. nauch.-prakt. konf. S mezhdunarod. uchastiem. Kurgan, 2005; 39.
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
2014_04_645-648.pdf | 315.53 KB |