Саратовский научно-медицинский ЖУРНАЛ

Развитие технологий эндотелиальной кератопластики (обзор)

Резюме:

Цель: анализ технологий эндотелиальной кератопластики (ЭК), оценка преимуществ и недостатков каждого метода, включая преэндотелиальную кератопластику с десцеметорексисом (PDEK) в лечении различных заболеваний роговицы. В обзоре литературы анализируются опубликованные данные о современных методах ЭК. Для поиска статей использовали базу данных PubMed. Всего использовано 50 источников литературы, опубликованных в период с 1956 по 2020 г. Задняя автоматизированная послойная кератопластика (DSAEK) и трансплантация десцеметовой мембраны (DMEK) являются популярными методами лечения пациентов с патологией эндотелия роговицы, но имеют ряд недостатков, таких как: невысокая острота зрения в отдаленный послеоперационный период (DSAEK), возрастное ограничение доноров и трудность манипуляций с изолированной десцеметовой мембраной (DMEK). Учитывая изложенные недостатки, изучение альтернативных методов ЭК является актуальным. Одной из новейших технологий трансплантации роговичной ткани, позволяющей избежать вышеперечисленные проблемы, является PDEK.

Литература:
1. Singh R, Gupta N, Vanathi M, Tandon R. Corneal transplantation in the modern era. Indian J Med Res 2019; 150 (1): 7-22.
2. Tillett CW. Posterior lamellar keratoplasty. Am J Ophthal-mol Elsevier Inc 1956; (41): 530-3.
3. Melles G, Eggink FA, Lander F, et al. A surgical technique for posterior lamellar keratoplasty. Cornea 1998; (17): 618-26.
4. Melles GRJ, Lander F, Nieuwendaal С Sutureless, posterior lamellar keratoplasty: A case report of a modified technique. Cornea 2002; (21): 325-7.
5. Terry MA, Ousley PJ. Deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty in the first United States patients. Cornea 2001; (20): 239-43.
6. Melles GRJ, Wijdh RHJ, Nieuwendaal CP. A Technique to excise the Descemet membrane from a recipient cornea (De-scemetorhexis). Cornea 2004; (23): 286-8.
7. Gorovoy MS. Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 2006; (25): 886-9.
8. Melles G, San Ong T, Ververs B. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Cornea 2006; (25): 987-90.
9. Agarwal A, Harminder S, Narang P, et al. Pre-Descem-et's endothelial keratoplasty (PDEK). Br J Ophthalmol 2014; (98): 1181-5.
10. Price MO, Gupta P, Lass J, Price FW Jr. EK (DLEK, DSEK, DMEK): new frontier in cornea surgery. Annu Rev Vis Sci 2017; (3): 69-90.
11. Suh L, Sonia H, Avnish D, et al. Complications of De-scemet's stripping with automated endothelial keratoplasty: survey of 118 eyes at One Institute. Ophthalmology 2008; (115): 1517-24.
12. Covert DJ, Koenig SB. New triple procedure: Descem-et's stripping and automated endothelial keratoplasty combined with phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation. Ophthalmology 2007; (114): 1272-7.
13. Li JY, Mark A, Jeffrey G, et al. Three-year visual acuity outcomes after Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 2012; (119): 1126-9.
14. Wacker K, Baratz H, Maguire J, et al. Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty for fuchs' endothelial corneal dystrophy: five-year results of a prospective study. Ophthalmology Elsevier Inc, 2016; (123): 154-60.
15. Yamaguchi T, Ohnuma K, Tomida D, et al. The contribution of the posterior surface to the corneal aberrations in eyes after keratoplasty. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011; (52): 6222-9.
16. Tomida D, Yamaguchi T, Ogawa A, et al. Effects of corneal irregular astigmatism on visual acuity after conventional and femtosecond laser-assisted Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Jpn J Ophthalmol Springer Japan 2015; (59): 216-22.
17. Hjortdal J, Nielsen E, Vestergaard A, et al. Inverse cutting of posterior lamellar corneal grafts by a femtosecond laser. Open Ophthalmol J 2012; (6): 19-22.
18. Hos D, Matthaei M, Bock F, et al. Immune reactions after modern lamellar (DALK, DSAEK, DMEK) versus conventional penetrating corneal transplantation. Prog Retin Eye Res Elsevier 2019; (73): 100768.
19. Price MO, Jordan C, Moore G, et al. Graft rejection episodes after Descemet stripping with endothelial keratoplasty: part two: the statistical analysis of probability and risk factors. Br J Ophthalmol 2009; (93): 391-5.
20. Wu El, Ritterband DC, Yu G, et al. Graft rejection following descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: features, risk factors, and outcomes. Am J Ophthalmol 2012; 153 (5): 949-57.
21. Sepsakos L, Shah K, Lindquist TP, et al. Rate of rejection after descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty in Fuchs dystrophy: three-year follow-up. Cornea 2016; 35 (12): 1537-41.
22. Price MO, Giebel AW, Fairchild KM et al. Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty: prospective multicenter study of visual and refractive outcomes and endothelial survival. Ophthalmology 2009 Dec;116 (12):2361-8.
23. Heinzelmann S, Huther S, Bohringer D, et al. Influence of donor characteristics on Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 2014; (33): 644-8.
24. Dapena I, Moutsouris K, Droutsas K, et al. Standardized no-touch' technique for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol 2011; (129): 88-94.
25. Heindl LM, Riss S, Laaser K, et al. Split cornea transplantation for 2 recipients — review of the first 100 consecutive patients. Am J Ophthalmol Elsevier Inc 2011; (152): 523-32.
26. Terry MA. Endothelial keratoplasty: why aren't we all doing Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty? Cornea 2012; (31): 469-71.
27. Gorovoy MS. DMEK Complications. Cornea 2014; (33): 101-4.
28. Stuart AJ, Romano V, Virgili G, et al. Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) versus Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) for corneal endothelial failure. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; (25): CD012097.
29. Guell JL, Morral M, Gris O, et al. Comparison of sulfur hexafluoride 20% versus air tamponade in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology Elsevier Inc 2015; (122): 1757-64.
30. Bucher F, Hos D, Muller-Schwefe S, et al. Spontaneous long-term course of persistent peripheral graft detachments after Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Br J Ophthalmol 2015; (99): 768-72.
31. Heinzelmann S, Maier P, Bohringer D, et al. Cystoid macular oedema following Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. BrJ Ophthalmol 2015; (99): 98-102.
32. Deng SX, Lee W, Hammersmith K, et al. Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: Safety and Outcomes: A report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 2018; 125 (2): 295-310.
33. Ham L, Dapena I, Liarakos V, et al. Mid-term results of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: 4 to 7 years clinical outcome. Am J Ophthalmol Elsevier Ltd 2016; (171): 113-21.
34. Price DA, Kelley M, Price FW Jr, Price MO. Five-year graft survival of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (EK) versus Descemet stripping EK and the effect of donor sex matching. Ophthalmology 2018; 125 (10): 1508-14.
35. Singh A, Zarei-Ghanavati M, Avadhanam V, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty versus Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty/Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 2017; (36): 1437-43.
36. Schrittenlocher S, Schlereth S, Siebelmann S, et al. Long-term outcome of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) following failed penetrating keratoplasty (PK). Acta Ophthalmol 2020; 98 (7): e901 -e906.
37. Anshu A, Price MO, Price FWJ. Risk of corneal transplant rejection significantly reduced with Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology Elsevier Inc 2012; (119): 536-40.
38. Baydoun L, Livny E, Ham L, et al. 360-degree Scheimp-flug imaging to predict allograft rejection after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 2016; (35): 1385-90.
39. Hos D, Tuac O, Schaub F, et al. Incidence and clinical course of immune reactions after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: retrospective analysis of 1000 consecutive eyes. Ophthalmology 2017; 124 (4): 512-8.
40. Hos D, Heindl L, Bucher F, et al. Evidence of donor corneal endothelial cell migration from immune reactions occurring after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 2014; (33): 331-4.
41. Monnereau C, Bruinsma M, Ham L, et al. Endothelial cell changes as an indicator for upcoming allograft rejection following Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol Elsevier Inc 2014; (158): 485-95.
42. Pan JCH, Eong KGA. Spontaneous resolution of corneal oedema after inadvertent 'Descemetorhexis' during cataract surgery. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2006; (34): 896-7.
43. Choo SY, Zahidin AZM, Then KY. Spontaneous corneal clearance despite graft detachment in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol Elsevier Inc 2010; (149): 531.
44. Watson SL, Abiad G, Coroneo MT. Spontaneous resolution of corneal oedema following Descemet's detachment. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2006; (34): 797-9.
45. Dua HS, Faraj A, Said D, et al. Human corneal anatomy redefined: a novel pre-Descemet's layer (Dua's layer). Ophthalmology 2013; (120): 1778-85.
46. Agarwal A, Dua H, Narang P, etal. Pre-Descemet's endothelial keratoplasty (PDEK). BrJ Ophthalmol 2014; (98): 1181-5.
47. Dua HS, Termote K, Kenawy M, et al. Scrolling characteristics of pre-Descemet's endothelial keratoplasty (PDEK) tissue: An ex-vivo study. Am J Ophthalmol Elsevier Ltd 2016; (166): 84-90.
48. Agarwal A, Agarwal A, Narang P, et al. Pre-Descemet endothelial keratoplasty with infant donor corneas: A prospective analysis. Cornea 2015; (34): 859-65.
49. Dua HS, Faraj L, Kenawy M, et al. Dynamics of big bubble formation in deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty by the big bubble technique: in vitro studies. Acta Ophthalmol 2018; (96): 69-76.
50. Dua HS, Said DG. Pre-Descemet's endothelial keratoplasty: the PDEK clamp for successful PDEK. Eye Nature Publishing Group 2017; (31): 1106-10.

Прикрепленный файлРазмер
2022_01_012-018.pdf353.22 кб

Голосов пока нет