Saratov JOURNAL of Medical and Scientific Research

Auditory steady-state evoked potentials in sensorineural hearing loss and normal auditory function

Year: 2025, volume 21 Issue: №3 Pages: 254-257
Heading: Otorhinolaryngology Article type: Original article
Authors: Noskova V.V., Khrabrikov A.N.
Organization: Kirov State Medical University
Summary:

Objective: to evaluate the correlation between psychoacoustic hearing thresholds and ASSR (Auditory Steady-State Response) thresholds in patients with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and in otologically healthy subjects. Material and methods. Auditory function was studied in 130 people grouped into 3 groups: group 1 consisted of patients with chronic SNHL (n=50), group 2 - patients with acute SNHL (n=50), group 3 - otologically healthy subjects (n=30). Thresholds were compared when registering tonal threshold audiometry and when registering auditory stationary evoked potentials. Results. The average difference between psychoacoustic hearing thresholds and ASSR thresholds at 4 speech frequencies in patients with SNHL in the right ear was 15 dB normal hearing threshold (NHT; p=0.005), in the left ear- 14.4 dB NHT (p=0.005), with a minimum difference of 12.3±5.9 dB NHT at 4000 Hz in patients with chronic SNHL in the right ear (p<0.001), with a maximum difference of 18.4±8.2 dB NHT at a frequency of 2000 Hz in patients with acute SNHL in the left ear (p=0.005). In otologically healthy subjects, the average difference between psychoacoustic hearing thresholds and ASR thresholds at 4 speech frequencies in the right ear was 10 dB NHT, in the left ear- 11.2 dB NHT. The minimum threshold difference was detected at a frequency of 4000 Hz in the right ear (6.5±1.6dB NHT; p<0.001), the maximum at a frequency of 500 Hz in the right ear (14.8±5.8 dB NHT). In patients with SNHL, the correlation coefficient ranged from 0.81 to 0.94 (p<0.001) when registering the tonal threshold audiometry and ASSR test. In otologically healthy subjects, the correlation closeness on the Chaddock scale ranged from 0.76 to 0.96 (p<0.001). Conclusion. The obtained values demonstrate a significant strong correlation between psychoacoustic hearing thresholds and ASSR thresholds.

Bibliography:
1. Tufatulin GSh. The optimal stimulation parameters of the free-field auditory steady-state responses. Russian Bulletin of Otorhinolaryngology. 2020;85(5):18-23. DOI:10.17116/otorino20208505118
2. Savelieva ЕЕ, Tufatulin GSh, Saveliev ES. Auditory evoked potentials on an inpatient basis in clinical practice. Russian Medical Journal. 2020;5:3-8.
3. Herdman AT, Lins О, Van Roon P, et al. Intracerebral sources of human auditory steady-state responses. Brain Topogr. 2002;15(2):69-80. DOI:10.1023/a:1021470822922
4. Naumova IV, Gadaleva SV, Pashkov AV Auditory steady-state responses. Literature review. Rossiiskaya otorinolaringologiya. 2018;3(94):115-29. DOI:10.18692/1810-4800-2018-3-115-129
5. Dimitrijevic A, John SM, Van Roon P, et al. Estimating the audiogram using multiple auditory steady-state responses. J Am Acad Audiol. 2002;13(04):205-24. PMID: 12025896
6. Swanepoel D, Hugo R, Roode R. Auditory steady-state responses for children with severe to profound hearing loss. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006;130(5):531-5. DOI:10.1001/archotol.130.5.531
7. Lee HS, An JH, Kim YJ, et al. The correlation between pure tone audiometry and auditory steadystate response according to the hearing level and frequency. Korean Journal of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. 2006;49(6):593-7. DOM 0.1016/j.juro.2013.02.001
8. Farias VB, Sleifer P, Pauletti LF, Krimberg CF. Correlation of the findings of auditory steady-state evoked potential and of behavioral hearing assessment in infants with sensorineural hearing loss. CoDAS. 2014;26(3):226-30. DOI:10.1590/2317-1782/201420140491

AttachmentSize
2025_03_254-257.pdf367.24 KB

No votes yet