Surgery for bilateral macular hole (clinical case)
Year: 2022, volume 18 Issue: №4 Pages: 643-646
Heading: Тhematic supplement Article type: Case report
Authors: Andreichenko О.А., Melnikova Yu.A.
Organization: Saratov State Medical University
Heading: Тhematic supplement Article type: Case report
Authors: Andreichenko О.А., Melnikova Yu.A.
Organization: Saratov State Medical University
Summary:
Abstract. Idiopathic macular rupture is a rather rare pathology, occurring to a greater extent among the female population. Based on the above clinical case, the effectiveness of various methods of operative treatment of large and small diameter ruptures, as well as tactics and functional results after reconstitution in case of inefficiency of primary operative treatment of macular rupture are considered. Described is apatient with bilateral idiopathic macular hole in both eyes underwent a standard 3-port 25G vitrectomy with removal of the posterior hyaloid membrane, peeling of the internal limiting membrane and endotamponade with an air-gas mixture. The condition of the right eye after 1 month required the 2nd stage of surgical treatment — revision of the vitreal cavity with a wider removal of the internal border membrane, the introduction of platelet mass and endotamponade of the vitreal cavity with silicone oil. After surgical treatment of the patient, both eyes achieved complete closure of the macular hole and increased visual acuity in both eyes.
Bibliography:
1. Gupta D, Goldsmith С, Burton R. Surgery for bilateral macular holes. Eye. 2009; (23): 556-8. DOI: 10.1038/eye. 2008.75.
2. Kamenskikh TG, Kolbenev IO, Melnikova YA, Andreychenko OA. Optical coherence tomography with angi-ography in the analysis of vitrectomy effectiveness in patients with vitreomacular traction syndrome. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2020; 17 (1): 70-5.
3. Gorshkov IM, Kolesnik SV, Shestopalov VI, Miridono-va AV Clinical and morphological features of cells implicated in the pathogenesis of idiopathic epiretinal membrane formation in patients with different visual acuity. Fyodorov Journal of Ophthalmic Surgery. 2017; (2): 6-11.DOI: 10.25276/0235-4160-2017-2.
4. Garcia-Layana A, Garcia-Arumi J, Ruiz Moreno J, Arias Barquet L. A Review of Current Management of Vitreomacular Traction and Macular Hole. J Ophthalmol. 2015; (2015): 809640. DOI: 10.1155/2015/809640.
5. Charalampidou S, Nolan J, Beatty S. The natural history of tractional cystoid macular edema. Retina. 2012; 32 (10): 2045-51. DOI: 10.1097/IAE. 0b013e3182561 fe6.
6. Gass JD. Reappraisal of biomicroscopic classification of stages of development of a macular hole. Am J Ophthalmol. 1995; 119(6): 752-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9394 (14) 72781-3.
7. Samoilov AN, Khaibrakhmanov TR, Fazleeva GA, Samoilov PA. Idiopathic macular hole: history and current state of the problem. Vestnik Oftalmologii. 2017; 133 (6): 131-7.
8. Lewis ML, Cohen SM, Smiddy WE, Gass JD. Bilaterality of idiopathic macular holes. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1996; 234 (4): 241-5. DOI: 10.1007/BF00430416.27.
9. McCannel CA, Ensminger JL, Diehl NN, Hodge DN. Population-based incidence of macular holes. Ophthalmology. 2009; 116(7): 1366-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.01.052.
10. Shkvorchenko DO, Zakharov VD, Rusanovskaya AV, et al. Comparative analysis of vitreofoveolar traction syndrome surgical treatment. Oftal'mologicheskie Vedomosti. 2014; 7 (3): 28-33.
11. Bikbov MM, Altynbaev UR, Gilmanshin TR, Chernov MS. Choice of method for intraoperative closure of large-diameter idiopathic macular hole. Ophthalmosurgery. 2010; (1): 25-8.
12. Morizane Y, Shiraga F, Kimura S, et al. Autologous transplantation of the internal limiting membrane for refractory macular holes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014; (10): 1000-5.
13. Stolyarenko GE, KolchinAA, Didenko LV Features of the vitreomacular interface in epiretinal fibrosis. In: X Congress of Russian ophthalmologists: Sat. materials. M., 2015: p. 162.
14. Machado L, Furlani В, Navarro R, et al. Preoperative and intraoperative prognostic factors of epiretinal membranes using chromovitrectomy and internal limiting membrane peeling. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2016; 46 (4): 457-62. DOI: 10.3928/23258160-20150422-09.
15.YanoffM, DukerJ. Ophthalmology. 5th ed. Elsevier, 2018; Chapter 8: p. 31.3-31.5.
16. Niwa H, Terasaki H, Ito Y, Miyake Y. Macular hole development in fellow eyes of patients with unilateral macular hole. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005; 140 (3): 370-5.
17. Lewis ML, Cohen SM, Smiddy WE, Gass JD. Bilaterality of Idiopathic macular holes. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1996; 234 (4): 241-4.
18. McDonnel PJ, Fine SL, Hills Al. Clinical features of idiopathic macular holes. Am J Ophthalmol. 1982; (93): 777-81.
19. Oz O, Fudenmburg SJ, Cakir B, et al. Predictors of success in macular hole surgery with emphasis on the internal limiting membrane and ILM peeling. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 2004; 35 (3): 207-14.
20. Mester U, Becker M. Prognostic factors in surgery of macular holes. Ophthalmologe. 1998; 95 (3): 158-62.
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| 2022_04-1_643-646.pdf | 1.47 MB |
Русский
English