Physiotherapeutic methods of treatment of cerebrovascular pathology (review)
Heading: Neurology Article type: Review
Authors: Brovko M.A., Chekhonatskiy A.A., Kovalev E.P., Bazhanov S.P., Tsyganov V.I., Krasnikova V.V.
Organization: Saratov State Medical University
Objective: to analyze the data available in the literature on the effectiveness of physiotherapy in cerebrovascular pathology according to the research of specialists dealing with the problems of treatment and rehabilitation of the consequences of diseases in this group of pathologies. To write the review we studied databases: PubMed, MEDLINE, Cohrane Library, eLibrary using keywords: "pudendal neuralgia", "surgical treatment", "open decompression of the genital nerve", "pulse radiofrequency denervation". Depth of search —from 1990 to 2022. The number of analyzed sources is 56, 22 of them were selected for the review. This publication presents the main new methods of physiotherapy in the treatment and rehabilitation of cerebrovascular pathology, with the example of stroke and the consequences of cranio-cerebral trauma. Conclusion. Despite the availability of various methods of rehabilitation physio-functional treatment of the consequences of cerebrovascular diseases, there is currently no clear algorithm for their use, and therefore the question of choosing the most optimal method and/or combination of physiotherapy methods remains open.
Bibliography:
1. Shvirenko IR, Povazhnaya ES, Lykov AA, et al. Medical Rehabilitation: modern condition, problems and prospects. Actual Problems of Rehabilitology and Pedagogy: Collection of scientific paper 2017; 3: 1 (4): 5-18.
2. Veerbeek JM, van Wegen E, van Peppen R, et al. What is the evidence for physical therapy poststroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2014; 9 (2): e87987.
3. Musaev AV, Balakishieva FK. Transcerebral physiotherapy of ischemic brain diseases. Russian Journal of the Physial Therapy, Balneotherapy and Rehabilitation 2012; 11 (6): 3-11.
4. Bykovskaya TYu. Fundamentals of rehabilitation: participation in the treatment, diagnostic and rehabilitation process. Rostov-on-Don: Phoenix, 2017; p. 172-80.
5. Karachintseva NV, Mozheyko EYu. The application of physiotherapy in cerebral stroke from the evidence-based medicine standtpoint. Bulletin of Rehabilitation Medicine 2021; 20 (1): 27-34.
6. Gilmutdinova LT, Iseeva DR, lymilova GT, et al. The use of general magnetotherapy in the rehabilitation treatment of patients with dyscirculatory encephalopathy. Fundamental Research 2012; 7 (1): 71-5.
7. Lyusenyuk VP, Zasukha ВА, Balitsky АР. Application of transcranial magnetic stimulation in ischemic stroke patients in the acute and early recovery periods for diagnostic and therapeutic-rehabilitation purposes. Physiotherapy, Balneology and Rehabilitation 2013; 12 (3): 4-12.
8. Cherviakov AV, Poydasheva AG, Korzhova, etal. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in neurology and psychiatry. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2015; 115 (12): 7-18.
9. Akimganova АК, Grgibovskii AM, Haibulin TN, et al. Effectiveness of transcranial magnetic stimulation in the rehabilitation of patients with cerebral stroke. Science & Healthcare 2016; (4): 50-65.
10. Kutashov VA, Ulyanova OV. The use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in a comprehensive examination of patients with ischemic stroke in the late recovery period from a therapeutic and rehabilitation perspective. Herald of Physiotherapy and Health Resort Therapy 2018; (3): 1-8.
11. Kim WS, Lee К, Kim S, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of motor impairment following traumatic brain injury. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2019; 16 (1): 14.
12. Knutson JS, Fu MJ, Sheffler LR, Chae J. Neuromuscu-lar electrical stimulation for motor restoration in hemiplegia. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2015; 26 (4): 729-45.
13. Bender Pape TL, Herrold AA, Guernon A, et al. Neuro-modulatory interventions for traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2020; 35 (6): 365-70.
14. Demirtas-Tatlidede A, Vahabzadeh-Hagh AM, Berna-beu M, et al. Noninvasive brain stimulation in traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2012; 27 (4): 274-92.
15. Cesar R, Yuechun W, Onat A, et al. What's new in traumatic brain injury: update on tracking, monitoring and treatment. Int J Mol Sci 2015; 16 (6): 11903-65.
16. Mustafaeva AS, Ivanova NE, Kiryanova VV, Mustafaev BS. Clinical and pathophysiological aspects of medical and social rehabilitation of patients in the acute period of severe traumatic brain injury. Neurosurgery and Neurology of Kazakhstan 2011; 1 (22): 25-33.
17. Bubashvili Al. Neurometabolic pharmacotherapy and scalp electrical stimulation in the complex treatment of patients with mild traumatic brain injury: PhD diss. Saratov, 2004; 144 p.
18. Musaev AV, Balakishieva FK. Electrophoresis of vaso-active drugs in the treatment and rehabilitation of patients with cerebral ischemic diseases. S. S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry 2010; 110 (2): 79-82.
19. Borisenko ОА, Kucherenko LV, Litvinenko YaS. Effectiveness of Mexiprim use by the method of endonasal electrophoresis in the treatment of psychovegetative syndrome in ATO participants in the long-term period of craniocerebral trauma. International Neurological Journal 2018; (5); 48-54.
20. Al-Zamil МН, Puzin MN, Shulaev AV, et al. The use of endonasal electrophoresis with Mexidol in combination with acupuncture in the treatment of patients with post-covid anosmia. The Bulletin of Contemporary Clinical Medicine 2022; 15 (2): 124-130.
21. Borisova NA, Ivanova MA, Avertsev GN, et al. Use of endonasal electrophoresis with Mexidol in early forms of cerebral vascular disease. Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine 2006; (1): 98-101.
22. Naidin VL, Krotkova ОА. Cerebrolysin electrophoresis in the correction of mental disorders in neurosurgical patients. Zhurnal Voprosy Neirokhirurgii Imeni N.N. Burdenko 1993; (4): 28-30).
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
2022_3_370-374.pdf | 325.27 KB |