Saratov JOURNAL of Medical and Scientific Research
Home

Home monitoring of general urine test for metaphylactic urinary disease (review)

Year: 2021, volume 17 Issue: №4 Pages: 731-737
Heading: Urology and andrology Article type: Review
Authors: Lebedev G.S., Shaderkin I.A., Shaderkina V.A., Rudenko V.I., Gazimiev M.A.
Organization: First Moscow State Medical University n.a. I.M. Sechenov, Urological Information Portal UroWeb.ru
Summary:

Purpose: of the review is to demonstrate the capabilities of telemedicine technologies in one nosology — urolithia-sis. The article discusses both promising and currently available technologies for remote dynamic monitoring of patients with diagnosed urolithiasis based on the data of general urine analysis based on materials from foreign (PubMed — 21 publications) and domestic (eLibrary— 11 publications) literature, published between 2007 and 2021. The search was carried out according to the phrases «urolithiasis», «remote monitoring», «urinary analyzer», «test strips», «urine pH», «pH-selfie-control». Today, there are no standardized methods that could be offered to the patient as a single standard for home monitoring of urolithiasis. The available analyzers, pH meters, diagnostic strips, test strips, collector devices for determining the acidity and density of urine in patients with ICD are characterized by a certain level of error. However, in most cases they provide good performance combined with ease of use. Devices of this type have yet to truly take their place in the market. The introduction of remote technologies into medical practice is already a fait accompli, which, in our opinion, will continue to develop in the coming years.

Keywords: pH-self-control, remote monitoring, urolithiasis

Bibliography:
1. Lebedev GS, Shaderkin IA, Fomina IV, et al. The Internet of Medical Things: the first steps to systematize. Journal of Telemedicine and e-Health 2017; (3): 128-36.
2. Shaderkin IA, Lebedev GS, Perhov VI. Application of e-healthcare to implement patient-centered urological care. Journal of Telemedicine and e-Health 2018; 4(1-2): 3-8.
3. IvanovAA. Telemedicine Solutions for Home Instrumental Diagnosis in a Patient in Pandemic Conditions. Journal of Telemedicine and e-Health 2021; 7 (1): 25-34.
4. Kaprin AD, Apolikhin Ol, Sivkov AV, et al. Analysis of uronephrological morbidity and mortality in the Russian Federation for the period 2002-2014 according to official statistics. Experimental and Clinical Urology 2016; (3): 4-13.
5. DavidovMI, DreminYel, Nikonova OYe, etal. Epidemiology of urolithiasis in the Perm Territory: results of a 30-year study. Experimental and Clinical Urology 2019; (3): 4-10.
6. SkolarikosA, Straub М, Knoll Т, et al. Metabolic evaluation and recurrence prevention for urinary stone patients: EAU guidelines. Eur Urol 2015; 67 (4): 750-63.
7. Hiller SC, Dauw CA, Ghani KR. Kidney Stone Care and the COVID-19 Pandemic: Challenges and Opportunities. J Urol 2020; 204 (6): 1122-4.
8. Oyaert M, Delanghe J. Progress in Automated Urinalysis. Ann Lab Med 2019; 39 (1): 15-22.
9. Lee DS, Jeon BG, Ihm C, et al. A simple and smart telemedicine device for developing regions: a pocket-sized colorimetric reader. Lab Chip 2011; (11): 120-6.
10. Yetisen AK, Akram MS, Lowe CR. Paper-based microfluidic point-of-care diagnostic devices. Lab Chip 2013; (13): 2210-51.
11. Jalal UM, Jin GJ, Shim JS. Paper-plastic hybrid microfluidic device for smartphone-based colorimetric analysis of urine. Anal Chem 2017; 89 (24): 13160-6.
12. Hosseini SA, Zanganeh S, Akbarnejad E, et al. Microfluidic device for label-free quantitation and distinction of bladder cancer cells from the blood cells using micro machined silicon based electrical approach; suitable in urinalysis assays. J Pharm Biomed Anal 2017; (134): 36-42.
13. Lepowsky E, Ghaderinezhad F, Knowlton S, et al. Paper-based assays for urine analysis. Biomicrofluidics 2017; 11 (5): 051501.
14. Rodchenkova V, Shahnovich I. Microfluidic chips are a designer for the developer. Dolomite Solutions. Analytics 2017; 34 (3): 60-9.
15. Angerri О, Pascual D, Наго J, et al. Comparative study between a medical device and reagent dipsticks in measuring pH. Arch Esp Urol 2020; 73 (6): 546-53.
16. Grases F, Rodriguez A, Berga F, et al. A new device for simple and accurate urinary pH testing by the Stone-former patient. Springerplus 2014; (3): 209.
17. Curie J, Fernandez X, Carne X, et al. Pilot study of the usability and functionality of a smart ph meter and a mobile medical application for urine pH monitoring. Arch Esp Urol 2021; 74 (7): 692-8.
18. Angerri O, Pascual D, Haro J, et al. Comparative study between a medical device and reagent dipsticks in measuring pH. Arch Esp Urol 2020; 73 (6): 546-53.
19. De Coninck V, Keller EX, Rodriguez-Monsalve M, et al. Evaluation of a portable urinary pH meter and reagent strips. J Endourol 2018; 32 (7): 647-52. DOI: 10.1089/end. 2018.0202.
20. Liebman SE, Taylor JG, Bushinsky DA. Uric acid nephrolithiasis. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2007; 9 (3): 251-7.
21. Sohnel O, Grases F. Supersaturation of body fluids, plasma and urine, with respect to biological hydroxyapatite. Urol Res 2011; 39 (6): 429-36.
22. Grases F, Costa-Bauza A, Gomila I. Urinary pH and renal lithiasis. Urol Res 2012; 40(1): 41-6.
23. Wu W, Gerard DE, Nancollas GH. Nucleation at surfaces: the importance of interfacial energy. J Am Soc Nephrol 1999; 10 (14):S355-8.
24. Kwong T, Robinson C, Spencer D. Accuracy of urine pH testing in a regional metabolic renal clinic: is the dipstick accurate enough? Urolithiasis 2013; 41 (2): 129-32.
25. Desai RA, Assimos DG. Accuracy of urinary dipstick testing for pH manipulation therapy. J Endourol 2008; 22 (6): 1367-70.
26. Abbott JE, Miller DL, Shi W. Optimization of urinary dipstick pH: Are multiple dipstick pH readings reliably comparable to commercial 24-hour urinary pH? Investig Clin Urol 2017; 58 (5): 378-82.
27. Smith GT, Dwork N, Khan SA. Bowden Robust dipstick urinalysis using a low-cost, micro-volume slipping manifold and mobile phone platform. Lab Chip 2016; 16 (11): 2069-8.
28. Prosyannikov MYu, Shaderkin IA, Konstantinova OV, et al. Remote monitoring of the general urine analysis indicators in the treatment of urinary acid urolithiasis patients with citrate mixtures. Urology 2019; (3): 60-5.
29. Prosyannikov MYu, ShadYorkin IA, Konstantinova OV, et al. Online assessment of nutrition stereotype in urolithiasis. Journal of Telemedicine and e-Health 2017; (1): 18-21.
30. Shaderkin IA, Vladzimirskiy AV, Voytko DA, et al. Diagnostic value of the portable urine analyzer "ETTA AMP-01", as a self-monitoring tool in mHealth and in primary care screening. Experimental and Clinical Urology 2015; 7 (4): 22-6.
31. Shaderkin IA, Tsoy АА, Sivkov AV, et al. mHealth new opportunities for developing telecommunications technologies in healthcare. Experimental and Clinical Urology 2015; 7 (2): 142-8.
32. Gadzhiev NK, Brovkin SS, Grigorev VE, et al. Metaphylactics of urolithiasis: a new look, a modern approach, mobile implementation. Urology 2017; (1): 124-9.

AttachmentSize
2021_04_731-737.pdf420.51 KB
All articles of the authors: Gazimiev M.A. , Lebedev G.S., Rudenko V.I., Shaderkin I.A., Shaderkina V.A.

No votes yet