A comparison of effectiveness of various marking methods of toric intraocular lens implantation during cataract surgery
Year: 2021, volume 17 Issue: №4 Pages: 697-700
Heading: Ophthalmology Article type: Original article
Authors: Alnoelaty Almasri M.A., Stebnev V.S.
Organization: Samara State Medical University
Heading: Ophthalmology Article type: Original article
Authors: Alnoelaty Almasri M.A., Stebnev V.S.
Organization: Samara State Medical University
Summary:
Purpose: to evaluate the effectiveness of isolated manual marking, manual marking using a cell phone and digital marking using the VERION system during implantation of toric intraocular lens (IOL) during phacoemulsification. Material and methods. An observational study was conducted, including 70 patients (100 eyes) with diagnosed senile cataract and corneal astigmatism >0.75 D. Isolated manual marking was performed in a sitting position on a 6-hour limbus (manual axis — 90°) using a slit lamp. Manual marking using a cell phone was carried out through the Android application iToric Patwardhan. The digital marking was carried out in the prone position on the external screen using the digital overlay of the VERION axis and was taken as the reference axis. Results. The average absolute angular deviation between the axis of the mobile program and the VERION axis was 1.97°, which is significantly lower than that of the isolated manual marking axis (3.8°) (p=0.05). The correlation coefficient between the axis parameters for mobile marking and the VERION axis parameters was 0.85. Conclusion. Manual marking using a mobile application demonstrates significantly greater accuracy and efficiency than isolated manual marking. The VERION digital system is recognized as a reference method for marking the corneal axis during implantation of a toric IOL.
Bibliography:
1. Prasher P, Sandhu JS. Prevalence of corneal astigmatism before cataract surgery in Indian population. Int Ophthalmol 2017; 37 (3): 683-9. DOI: 10.1007/s10792-016-0327-z.
2. Yuan X, Song H, Peng G, et al. Prevalence of corneal astigmatism in patients before cataract surgery in Northern China. J Ophthalmol 2014; 2014: 536412. DOI: 10.1155/2014/536412.
3. Behndig A, Montan P, Stenevi U, et al. Aiming for emmetropia after cataract surgery: Swedish National Cataract Register study, J Cataract Refract Surg 2012; 38 (7): 1181-6. DOI: 10.1016/j. jcrs. 2012.02.035.
4. Sorkin N, Rosenblatt A, Barequet I, et al. Predictability of biometry in patients undergoing cataract surgery. Optom Vis Sci 2016; 93 (12): 1545-51. DOI:10.1097/OPX. 0000000000000990.
5. Visser N, Berendschot TT, Bauer NJ, et al. Accuracy of toric intraocular lens implantation in cataract and refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2011; (37): 1394-402.
6. Farooqui JH, Sharma M, Koul A, et al. Evaluation of a new electronic pre-operative reference marker for toric IOL implantation by two different methods of analysis: Adobe photoshop versus itrace. Adv Ophthalmol Vis Syst 2015; (2): 57.
7. Ma JJK, Tseng SS. Simple method foraccurate alignment in toric phakic and aphakic intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008; (34): 1631-6.
8. Carey PJ, Leccisotti A, McGilligan VE, et al. Assessment of toric intraocular lens alignment by a refractive power/corneal analyzer system and slitlamp observation. J Cataract Refract Surg 2010; (36): 222-9.
9. lusef luN, lusef SN, Ivanov MN, et al. Modern methods of astigmatism correction in cataract surger. Vestn Oftalmol 2014; 130 (1): 91-5. PMID: 24684073.
10. Webers V, Bauer N, Visser N, et al. Image-guided system versus manual marking for toric intraocular lens alignment in cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2017; (43); 781-8.
11. Pallas A, Yeo TK, Trevenen M, et al. Evaluation of the accuracy of two marking methods and the novel toriCAM application for toric intraocular lens alignment. J Cataract Refract Surg 2018; (34): 150-5.
12. Teichman J, Baig K, Ahmed I. Simple technique to measure toric intraocular lens alignment and stability using a smartphone. J Cataract Refract Surg 2014; (40): 1949-52.
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| 2021_04_697-700.pdf | 678.57 KB |
Русский
English