Promising trends for the development of ophthalmology (review)
Year: 2021, volume 17 Issue: №3 Pages: 675-678
Heading: Тhematic supplement Article type: Review
Authors: Shlyapnikova O.A., Kamenskikh T.G., Roshchepkin V.V., Reshnikova L.B.
Organization: Saratov State Medical University, University Clinical Hospital №2 (Clinic of Eye Diseases)
Heading: Тhematic supplement Article type: Review
Authors: Shlyapnikova O.A., Kamenskikh T.G., Roshchepkin V.V., Reshnikova L.B.
Organization: Saratov State Medical University, University Clinical Hospital №2 (Clinic of Eye Diseases)
Summary:
The review is devoted to the most promising technologies that are important for the development of ophthalmology. The article provides an overview of the latest trends, focused on improving the quality of diagnosis and treatment of diseases of the visual system. Printed publications and electronic editions were analyzed. The depth of the literature search was 12 years. The review is based on the study of 26 foreign and 4 domestic sources obtained from international medical databases PubMed, Cochrane and e-Library for 2008-2021. The analysis of modern data concerning the development of algorithms for the diagnosis of retinal pathology, new approaches to the implantation of a visual prosthesis and the use of robotic devices and technologies in ocular surgery.
Bibliography:
1. Richter GM, Lee JC, Khan N, et al. Ocular and systemic determinants of perifoveal and macular vessel parameters in healthy African Americans. Br J Ophthalmol 2021 Nov 5. DOI: 10
1136/bjophthalmol-2021-319675.
2. Liakopoulos S, Spital G, Brinkmann CK, et al. ORCA study: real-world versus reading centre assessment of disease activity of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Br J Ophthalmol 2020; 104 (11): 1573-8. DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmo 1-2019-315717.
3.ApostolopoulosS,SalasJ, Ordonez JLP, etal.Automatically Enhanced ОСТ Scans of the Retina: A proof of concept study. Sci Rep 2020; 10(1): 7819. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-64724-8.
4. Yu KH, Beam AL, Kohane IS. Artificial intelligence in healthcare. Nat Biomed Eng 2018; 2 (10): 719-31. DOI: 10.1038/S41551 -018-0305-z.
5. Holz FG, Tadayoni R, Beatty S, et al. Multi-country real-life experience of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy for wet age-related macular degeneration. Br J Ophthalmol 2015; 99 (2): 220-6. DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-305327.
6. Fet G, Voegeler J, Schmitz-Valckenberg S, et al. Influence of OCT-examination during ranibizumab treatment of AMD patients in a real-life setting (Ocean study). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2017; 58: 412.
7. Holz FG, Figueroa MS, Bandello F, et al. Ranibizumab treatment in treatment-naive neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Retina 2020; 40: 1673-85. DOI: 10.1097/IAE. 0000000000002670.
8. Li RC, Asch SM, Shah NH. Developing a delivery science for artificial intelligence in healthcare. NPJ Digit Med 2020; 3: 107. DOI: 10.1038/S41746-020-00318-y.
9. Miguel A, SilvaA, Barbosa-Breda J,etal. OCTangiography detects longitudinal microvascular changes in glaucoma: a systematic review. Br J Ophthalmol 2021 Jan 15. DOI: 10.1136/ bjophthalmol-2020-318166.
10. Mendez-Hernandez C, Wang S, Arribas-Pardo P, et al. Diagnostic validity of optic nerve head colorimetric assessment and optical coherence tomography angiography in patients with glaucoma. BrJ Ophthalmol 2021; 105 (7): 957-63. DOI: 10.1136 /bjophthalmol-2020-316455.
11. Heydon P, Egan C, Bolter L, et al. Prospective evaluation of an artificial intelligence-enabled algorithm for automated diabetic retinopathy screening of 30000 patients. Br J Ophthalmol 2021; 105 (5): 723-8. DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-316594.
12. Lim J, Bhaskaranand M, Ramachandra S, et al. Screening artificial intelligence for diabetic retinopathy: an analysis of
a pivotal multicenter prospective clinical trial, presented at ARVO Imaging in the Eye Conference 2019. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 2019.
13. Wang S, Tseng B, Hernandez-Boussard T. Development and evaluation of new ophthalmic domain neural word embeddings for predicting visual prognosis. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2021; 150: 104464.
14. Loewenstein A, Goldberg D, Zur D, et al. An artificial intelligence algorithm for quantifying the volume of fluid in the retina based on self-image using a home ОСТ system. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2021; 62 (8): 351.
15. Bu SC, Kuijer R, Li XR, et al. Idiopathic epiretinal membrane. Retina 2014; 34 (12): 2317-35. DOI: 10.1097/IAE. 0000000000000349.
16. Cheung N, Tan SP, Lee SY, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for epiretinal membrane: the Singapore Epidemiology of Eye Disease study. BrJ Ophthalmol 2017; 101 (3): 371-6. DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-308563.
17. Kamenskikh TG, Kolbenev IO, Melnikova YuA, et al. Optical Coherence Tomography with Angiography in the Analysis of Vitrectomy Effectiveness in Patients with Vitreomacular Traction Syndrome. Ophthalmology in Russia 2020; 17 (1): 70-5.
18. Daurov S, Potemkin S, Kumova S, et al. Computer Analysis of Geometrical Parameters of the Retina Epiretinal Membrane. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control 2019; 199: 185-98.
19. Potemkin SA, Daurov SK, Batishcheva YuS, et al. Computer evaluation of the deformation of the retina membrane and geometric parameters of the central fossa: Certificate of registration of the computer program RU 2017613399, 17.03.2017. Application no. 2017610734 dated 23.01.2017.
20. Daurov SK, Dolinina ON, Kamenskikh TG, et al. Computer analysis of epiretinal membrane parameters. Saratov Journal of Medical Scientific Research 2017; 13 (2): 350-8.
21. Deng SX, Lee WB, Hammersmith KM, et al. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: safety and outcomes: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 2018; 125: 295-310. DOI: 10.1016/j. ophtha. 2017.08.015.
22. Price MO, Gupta P, Lass J, et al. EK (DLEK, DSEK, DMEK): new frontier in cornea surgery. Annu Rev Vis Sci 2017; 3: 69-90. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-vision-102016-061400.
23. Bonanno JA. Molecular mechanisms underlying the corneal endothelial pump. Exp Eye Res 2012; 95 (1): 2-7. DOI: 10.1016/j. exer. 2011.06.004.
24. Ang M, Tan D. Anterior segment reconstruction using artificial iris and endothelial keratoplasty of Descemet membrane: a stepwise surgical approach. British Journal of Ophthalmology 2020 Feb26. Doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-317906.
25. Savinainen A., Grossniklaus H, Kang S, et al. Ocular distribution and efficacy following suprachoroidal injection of AU-011 for the treatment of ocular melanoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2020; 61 (7): 3615.
27. Bourcier T, Nardin M, Sauer A, et al. Robot-assisted pterygium surgery: Feasibility study in a nonliving porcine model. Transl Vis Sci Technol 2015; 4 (1): 9. Doi: 10.1167/tvst. 4.1.9
28. Bourges JL, Hubschman JP, Wilson J, et al. Assessment of a hexapod surgical system for robotic micro-macro manipulations in ocular surgery. Ophthalmic Res 2011; 46 (1): 25-30. DOI: 10.1159/000314719.
29. Bourges JL, Hubschman JP, Burt B, et al. Robotic microsurgery: corneal transplantation. Br J Ophthalmol 2009; 93 (12): 1672-5. DOI: 10.1136/bjo. 2009.157594.
30. Bourla DH, Hubschman JP, Culjat M, et al. Feasibility study of intraocular robotic surgery with the da Vinci surgical system. Retina 2008; 28 (1): 154-8. DOI: 10.1097/IAE. 0b013e318068de46
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| 2021_03-2_675-678.pdf | 302.72 KB |
Русский
English