Population health and social stress (from the prevalence of myocardial infarction and gastric and duodenal ulcer)
Year: 2021, volume 17 Issue: №3 Pages: 532-535
Heading: Тhematic supplement Article type: Original article
Authors: Lipatova Т.Е., Tyultyaeva L.A., Denisova Т.Р.
Organization: Saratov State Medical University
Heading: Тhematic supplement Article type: Original article
Authors: Lipatova Т.Е., Tyultyaeva L.A., Denisova Т.Р.
Organization: Saratov State Medical University
Summary:
Purpose: to analyze the health of the population as a marker of social stress by comparing the analytical parameters of the prevalence of myocardial infarction (Ml) and gastric and duodenal ulcer (U). Material and Methods. We examined the data of the official statistical reports of the Saratov Health Committee. The prevalence of Ml and U in 1990-2000 was studied. The excitability, sensitivity, and stability of the population system were judged by analyzing the speed characteristics and fragments of phase portraits of the prevalence of Ml and U in a multidimensional phase space. Re-sults. The multidirectional speed characteristics of the dynamics of the prevalence of Ml and U in the population were revealed; a different number of time points when the sign of the rate of change in the prevalence of pathology changed to the opposite (for Ml — 5 times, forU — 3 times); the direction of movement of the image point is centrifugal for Ml and centripetal for U. Conclusion. The excitability and stability of the population system is higher in terms of the prevalence of Ml, the sensitivity of the population system is higher in terms of the prevalence of U.
Keywords: cardiac infarction, social stress
Bibliography:
1. Khmel AA. Development of theoretical views on the impact of social stress as a health risk factor at the beginning of the XXI century. Innovation and Investment 2020; (7): 84-8.
2. Velichkovsky ВТ. Human health and social stress. Russian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 2016; (1): 3-18.
3. Smoleva EO. Social stress and its coping strategies: Analysis of concepts and models. Social Space 2020; 6 (3): 3.
4. Vasilenko ЕА. Psychological mechanisms of the impact of social stress on the socio-psychological adaptation of the individual. Bulletin of the South Ural State Humanitarian and Pedagogical University 2019; (4): 279-302.
5. Denhardt DT. Effect of stress on human biology: epigenetics, adaptation, inheritance, and social significance. Journal of Cellular Physiology 2018; 233 (3): 1975-84.
6. Troisi A. Social stress and psychiatric disorders: evolutionary reflections on debated questions. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 2020; 116: 461-69.
7. Chernenkov YuV, Denisova TP, Tyultyaeva LA, Shuldyakov VA. Mathematical gastroenterology. Saratov: SSMU, 2013; 298 p.
8. Lipatova ТЕ, Tyultyaeva LA, Semenov SV, Kovalev ЕР The structure of the "acute abdomen" in a period of social stress in a large industrial center. Saratov Journal of Medical Scientific Research 2018; 14 (2): 338-41.
9. Tyultyaeva LA, Denisova TP, Lipatova ТЕ. Social stress as a risk factor of digestive diseases in the population of different age. Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology 2015; 18 (1): 139-45.
10. Volkenshteyn MV. Biophysics. Moscow: Nauka, 1988; 591 p.
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| 2021_03-1_532-535.pdf | 555.32 KB |
Русский
English