Saratov JOURNAL of Medical and Scientific Research

Objective methods for amblyopia diagnostics (review)

Year: 2021, volume 17 Issue: №2 Pages: 392-395
Heading: Тhematic supplement Article type: Review
Authors: Chuprov A.D., Voronina A.E.
Organization: The S. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution

The review analyzes available data and identifies problems in the diagnosis of amblyopia. Many authors come to the opinion that traditional methods for detecting amblyopia are insufficient and it is necessary to search for other objective methods, considering that the new methods presented in the literature do not have objective confirmation of their effectiveness. The following databases were used to search for information: eLIBRARY, Scopus, Google Academy PubMed. The analysis of 50 sources of literature on the topic of amblyopia for a period of no more than 15 years was carried out, 30 sources dated 2008-2021 were selected for the literary review.

1. Mosin IM, Kudryavtseva EA, Neudakhina EA. Application of posterior section of the eye visualization for evaluation of functional terminations in children with pseudophakia. Russian Pediatric Ophthalmology 2008; (4): 17-9.
2. Chuprov AD, Voronina АЕ, Borshchuk EL. Complex treatment of refractive amblyopia. Modern Problems of Science and Education 2021; (1).
3. Rychkova SI, Likhvantseva VG. The relationship of monocular and binocular mechanisms of spatial perception before and after functional treatment in children with postoperative residual microdeviation. Fyodorov Journal of Ophthalmic Surgery 2019; (4): 42-9.
4. Rowe FJ, Hepworth LR, Howard С, et al. Comparative analysis of the Lang Stereopad in a non-clinic population. Strabismus 2019; (27): 182-90.
5. Mishchenko ON, Novozhilova АО, Seliverstova II, et al. Binocularity map as a method for assessing visual functions in refractive and accommodative disorders. Bulletin of ESSC SB RAMS 2011; (3-1): 73-6.
6. Aznauryan IE. System for the restoration of visual function in refractive and dysbinocular amblyopia in children and adolescents: DSc abstract. Moscow, 2009; 49 p.
7. Matrosova YuV. Etiopathogenesis, clinical picture and methods of treatment of patients with amblyopia. Bulletin of the Novosibirsk State University. Series: Biology and Clinical Medicine 2012; 10(5): 193-202.
8. Matrosova YuV. Comparative assessment of efficiency of different methods of myopia treatment. Tambov University Reports. Series: Natural and Technical Sciences 2015; 20 (3): 642-4.
9. Usenko VA, Berdibaeva Al. Accommodative ability in patients with dysbinocular amblyopia with concomitant strabismus. Medical Journal of the Russian Federation 2020; 26 (1): 16-20.
10. Koshelev Dl, Galautdinov MF, Vakhmyanina AA. Experience of using visual evoked potentials for a flash in assessing the functions of the visual system. Vestnik of the Orenburg State University 2014; 173 (12): 181-7.
11. Takhchidi KhP, Antonova EG, Mitronina ML, et al. Features of the accommodative function of the eye in children with hyperopic refraction complicated by asthenopic syndrome. Vestnik of the Orenburg State University 2011; (14): 359-62.
12. Markova EYu, Kurganova OV, Bezmelnitsyna LYu, et al. Medical and social role of ametropia correction in children. Ophthalmology 2015; 12 (2): 83-7.
13. Gerhard CL. Optics and refractive errors. In: Ophthalmology/transl. from English; Neroev VV, ed. Moscow, 2009; p. 645-95.
14. Tidbury LP, O'Conor АК. The use of the plusoptix photoscreener for vision screening. Brit and Irish Orthoptic J 2013; 10: 11-6.
15. Silbert Dl, Matta NS, Andersen K. Plusoptix photoscreening may replace cycloplegic examination in select pediatric ophthalmology patients. J of AAPOS 2013; 17 (2): 163-5.
16. Apaev AV, Tarutta EP Comparative assessment of the parameters of visual fixation in amblyopia of various origins. The Russian Annals of Ophthalmology 2020; 136 (2): 26-31.
17. Boychuk IM, Yakhnitsa El. Morphometric parameters of the retina and optic nerve in children with amblyopia depending on monocular fixation. In: Fedorovskie chteniya — 2013: Proceedings of the 11th All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference with International Participation. Moscow, 2013; p. 58.
18. Burenina EV, Abdurazakova LA, Usungvan IV, et al. Investigation of the thickness of the central zone of the retina by optical coherence tomography (ОСТ) in children with refractive amblyopia, amblyopia, hyperopia and various sizes of the eyeball. In: Nevskie gorizonty— 2010: Proceedings of the jubilee scientific conference dedicated to the 75th anniversary of the first department of pediatric ophthalmology in Russia. St. Petersburg, 2010; p. 39-42.
19. Zavgorodnyaya NG, Tsybulskaya ТЕ. Features of the state of the visual analyzer in children with various types of amblyopia. In: Nevskie gorizonty — 2010: Proceedings of the jubilee scientific conference dedicated to the 75th anniversary of the first department of pediatric ophthalmology in Russia. St. Petersburg, 2010; p. 192-201.
20. Dickmann A, Petroni S, Perrotta V, et al. A morpho-functional study of amblyopic eyes with the use of optical coherence tomography and microperimetry. J of AAPOS 2011; 15 (4): 338-41.
21. Bikbov MM, Bikbulatova AA, Khusnitdinov II. Refractive amblyopia: Surgical and conservative treatment of children and adolescents. Ufa: GUP RB UPK, 2010; 158 p.
22. Korolenko AV, Savina YuN, Shchuko AG, et al. Study of regional blood circulation in dysbinocular amblyopia. Bulletin of the Novosibirsk State University. Series: Biology and Clinical Medicine 2012; 10(5): 117-22.
23. Lebedeva IS, Khatsenko IE. EEG markers of the functional state of the brain in children with amblyopia associated with treatment using neuropeptides. Russian Pediatric Ophthalmology 2017; (2): 27-33.
24. Toor S, Riddell Р, Horwood AM. The impact of asymmetrical accommodation on anisometropic amblyopia treatment outcomes. J of AAPOS 2019; 23 (4): 203.
25. Kraus CL, Culican SM. New advances in amblyopia therapy II: refractive therapies. Br J Ophthalmol 2018; 102 (12): 1611-4.
26. Conaghy JR, Guirk R. Amblyopia: Detection and Treatment. Am Fam Physician 2019; 100 (12): 745-50.
27. Zhao W, Jia WL, Chen G, et al. A complete investigation of monocular and binocular functions in clinically treated amblyopia. Sci Rep 2017; 7 (1): 10682.
28. Pershin KB, Pashinova NF, Cherkashina AV. Some modern aspects of cataract treatment in children. Current Pediatrics 2012; 11 (2): 68-73.
29. Sanchez I, Ortiz-Toquero S, Martin R, de Juan V Advantages, limitations, and diagnostic accuracy of photoscreeners in early detection of amblyopia: a review. Clin Ophthalmol 2016; 22 (10): 1365-73.
30. Dolzhich AV, Bubnova IA, Aslamazova AE. Modern methods of treatment of amblyopia. The Russian Annals of Ophthalmology 2018; 134 (4): 74-9.

2021_02-1_392-395.pdf332.24 KB

No votes yet