Saratov JOURNAL of Medical and Scientific Research

Anatomical variability of greater palatine canal and greater palatine foramen in men of the first period of adulthood

Year: 2020, volume 16 Issue: №4 Pages: 974-978
Heading: Human anatomy Article type: Original article
Authors: Kalmin O.V., Efremova A.V., Zyulkina L.A.
Organization: Penza State University
Summary:

The purpose of research is to reveal the anatomical variability of the shape and size of the greater palatine canal and the greater palatine foramen in men of the first period of adulthood. Material and Methods. The object of the study included 129 men of the first period of adulthood (from 20 to 35 years). The number of the greater palatine foramen, their shape, antero-posterior and medio-distal diameters, the length of the greater palatine canal, its shape, its medio-distal and antero-posterior diameters in the upper, middle and lower thirds of the canal were determined on cone-ray computed tomograms. Results. In men of the first period of adulthood, the medio-distal diameter of the greater palatine foramen on the right averaged 3.67±0.79 mm; on the left, 3.64±0.80 mm; the antero-posterior diameter of the greater palatine foramen on the right averaged 5.79 ±0.86 mm; on the left, 5.73±0.84 mm. 10 forms of the greater palatine foramen were identified: oval, elongated in the antero-posterior direction, helical, crescent-shaped, triangular, teardrop-shaped, round, bean-shaped, diamond-shaped, semicircular and ovoid. The length of the greater palatine canal on the right is 33.59±2.87 mm, on the left — 32.94±2.92 mm. 6 forms of the greater palatine canal were identified: wave-shaped, funnel-shaped with a bend in the lower third, hourglass shape, zigzag, crescent, straight shape. Conclusion. The greater palatine canal and the greater palatal foramen have a pronounced variability in size, shape and topography in men of the first period of adulthood. However, no significant bilateral differences in the medio-distal and anteropos-terior diameters of the greater palatine foramen and the length of the greater palatine canal were found.

Bibliography:
1. Sem'onova AA. Variant anatomy and morphometric characteristics of the palatine-alveolar complex in adult persons. PhD dissertation. St. Petersburg, 2016; 171 p.
2. Borodulin VG. The blockade of the maxillary nerve and the pterygopalatine node via the large palatal hole. Otorhinolaryngology 2013; (62): 45-8.
3. Kombantsev ЕА. Features of inflammatory and destructive processes in patients with diabetic retinopathy after panretinal laser coagulation of the retina and on the background of correction. PhD abstract. Novosibirsk, 2007; 21 p.
4. Bahsi i, Orhan М, Kervancioglu Р, et al. Morphometric evaluation and clinical implications of the greater palatine foramen, greater palatine canal and pterygopalatine fossa on CBCT images and review of literature. Surg Radiol Anat 2019; 41 (5): 551-67.
5. Das S, Kim D, Cannon TY, et al. High resolution computed tomography analysis of the greater palatine canal. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2006; 20 (6): 603-8. DOI:10.2500/ajr. 2006.20.2949.
6. Hwang SH, Seo JH, Joo YH, et al. An anatomic study using three dimensional reconstruction for pterygopalatine fossa infiltration via the greater palatine canal. Clinical Anatomy 2011; 24 (5): 576-82.
7. Aoun G, Nasseh I, Sokhn S. Radio-anatomical Study of the Greater Palatine Canal and the Pterygopalatine Fossa in a Lebanese Population: A Consideration for Maxillary Nerve Block. J Clin Imaging Sci 2016; (6): 35. DOI:10.4103/2156-7514.190862.

AttachmentSize
2020_04_974-978.pdf762.96 KB

No votes yet