Saratov JOURNAL of Medical and Scientific Research

The choice of performing tactics of dorsal decompressive-stabilizing interventions on the lumbar spine for the prevention of degenerative disease of an adjacent segment

Year: 2020, volume 16 Issue: №3 Pages: 762-768
Heading: neurosurgery Article type: Original article
Authors: Byvaltsev V.A., Kalinin А.А., Pestryakov Yu.Ya., Spiridonov A.V.
Organization: Clinical Hospital "Russian Railways Medicine", Irkutsk State Medical University, Krasnoyarsk Regional Clinical Hospital, Russian Railways
Summary:

Purpose: Comparative analysis of the results of dorsal decompressive-stabilizing interventions (DDSI) on the lumbar spine for substantiating the method of prevention of adjacent segment degenerative disease (ASDd). Material and Methods: 79 patients were included in the retrospective research, 2 groups were identified: in group I (n=41) single-level research, in group II (n=38) two-level DDSI, with rigid stabilization of the spinal motion segment, in the presence of signs of its degeneration was made. Clinical outcomes, instrumental data and surgical complications were evaluated. Results: It was a decrease of pain syndrome in the postoperative period, an improvement in the quality of life in two groups (p<0.001). In the inter-group comparison of the visual analog scale (VAS) — back, legs, ODI, SF-36 in group II, the results at discharge were lower than in group I (p<0.001), after 3.6.12 months there is a comparable improvement in a quality of life and a decrease in pain by VAS in both groups (p>0.05). In the distant period (24, 36 months), clinical results are better in-group II (p<0.05). The number of late surgical complications and revision interventions is higher in a group II (17.1 and 4.0%) (p<0.05). Conclusion: Preventive rigid stabilization of adjacent segment with signs of initial degeneration improves long-term results, reduces the number of repeated operations, despite the larger volume of primary medical intervention.

Bibliography:
1. Konovalov NA, Nazarenko AG, Asyutin DS. Modern treatments for degenerative disc diseases of the lumbosacral spine. A literature review. Issues of Neurosurgery 2016; 80 (4): 102-8.
2. Belykh Е, Kalinin АА, Martirosyan NL, et al. Facet Joint Fixation and Anterior, Direct Lateral, and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusions for Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Disc Diseases: Retrospective Cohort Study of a New Minimally Invasive Technique. World Neurosurg 2018; (114): 959-68.
3. Kaner T, Sasani M, Oktenoglu T, Ozer AF. Dynamic stabilization of the spine: a new classification system. Turk Neurosurg 2010; 20 (2): 205-15.
4. Gomleksiz C, Sasani M, Oktenoglu T, Ozer AF. A short history of posterior dynamic stabilization. Adv Orthop 2012; 2012: 629-98.
5. Pestryakov YY, Spiridonov AV, Kalinin AA, Byvaltsev VA. Incidence and risk factors of and risk factors of adjacent lumbar segment degenerative disease following dorsal decompression — stabilizing surgery. Modern problems of science and education 2020; (2). URL: http://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id= 29701.
6. Senegas J. Mechanical supplementation by non-rigid fixation in degenerative intervertebral lumbar segments: the Wallis system. Eur Spine J 2002;11 (Suppl 2): 164-9.
7. Carragee EJ, Chen Y, Tanner CM, et al. Provocative dis-cography in patients after limited lumbar discectomy: A controlled randomized study of pain response in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects. Spine 2000; 25: 3065-71.
8. Chan AK, Sharma V, Robinson LC, et al. Summary of Guidelines for the Treatment of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2019; 30 (3): 353-64.
9. Fujiwara A, Lim TH, An HS, et al. The effect of disc degeneration and facet joint osteoarthritis on the segmental flexibility of the lumbar spine. Spine 2000; (25): 3036-44.
10. Pfirrmann CW, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M, et al. Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine 2001; (26): 1873-8.
11. Shen S, Wang H, Zhang J, et. al. Diffusion Weighted Imaging, Diffusion Tensor Imaging, and T2
Mapping of Lumbar Intervertebral Disc in Young Healthy Adults. Iran J Radiol 2016; 13(1):e30069.
12. Liang J, Dong Y, Zhao H. Risk factors for predicting symptomatic adjacent segment degeneration requiring surgery in patients after posterior lumbar fusion. J Orthop Surg Res 2014; (9): 97.
13. Ha KY, Son JM, Im JH, Oh IS. Risk factors for adjacent segment degeneration after surgical correction of degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Indian J Orthop 2013; 47 (4): 346-51.
14. Cai X, Sun M, Huang Y, et al. Biomechanical Effect of L4 — L5 Intervertebral Disc Degeneration on the Lower Lumbar Spine: A Finite Element Study. Orthop Surg 2020; 12 (3): 917-30.
15. WuAM,ZhouY, Li QL, et al. Interspinous spacer versus traditional decompressive surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2014; 9 (5): 97142.
16. Hadlow SV, Fagan AB, Hillier TM, Fraser RD. The Graf ligamentoplasty procedure. Comparison with posterolateral fusion in the management of low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1998; 23 (10): 1172-9.
17. Bothmann M, Kast E, Boldt GJ, Oberle J. Dynesys fixation for lumbar spine degeneration. Neurosurg Rev 2008; 31 (2): 189-96.
18. Bozkus H, Senoglu M, Baek S, et al. Dynamic lumbar pedicle screw-rod stabilization: in vitro biomechanical comparison with standard rigid pedicle screw-rod stabilization. J Neurosurg Spine 2010; 12(2): 183-9.
19. Manchikanti L, Nampiaparampil DE, Manchikanti KN, et al. Comparison of the efficacy of saline, local anesthetics, and steroids in epidural and facet joint injections for the management of spinal pain: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Surg Neurol Int 2015; 6 (Suppl 4): 194-235
20. Ghasemi AA. Adjacent segment degeneration after posterior lumbar fusion: An analysis of possible risk factors. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2016; (143): 15-8.

AttachmentSize
2020_03_762-768.pdf732.63 KB

No votes yet