Saratov JOURNAL of Medical and Scientific Research
Home

Comparative analysis of treatment outcomes in patients with femoral neck fracture using monolateral wire and half-pin fixator of the authors' design and transosseous fixation wires

Year: 2014, volume 10 Issue: №4 Pages: 627-635
Heading: Traumatology and Orthopedics Article type: Original article
Authors: Allakhverdiev A.S., Soldatov Y.P.
Organization: Russian Ilizarov Scientific Center «Restorative Traumatology and Orthopaedics»
Summary:

Objective. The purpose of the study is to analyze the errors, complications and outcomes of the operative treatment of patients with femoral neck fracture in the 1st group with application of wires bundle and fixation in the llizarov frame (64 cases) and in the 2nd group with application of developed monolateral wire- and half-pin device (23 cases). Material and Methods. The observation of 87 patients with fractures of the femoral neck. Operations performed using spokes kit for transosseous osteosynthesis by GA llizarov and develop devices for the treatment of patients with
fractures of the proximal femur. Two groups of patients were studied: duration of surgery, duration of osteosynthesis, complications, and outcomes (in terms of one year after the dismantling clips) using the modified scale Luboshyce — Mattis — Schwartzberg. Results. Fracture repair was achieved in 40 patients (62,5%) of the 1st group. The following complications were observed in this group: non-union and pseudarthrosis — in 21 (32,8%) case; aseptic necrosis of the femoral head in 3 (4,7%) cases; hip ankyloses — in one (1,6%) case, breakage and migration of wires into the joint cavity and smaller pelvis — 3 (4,7%) patients and cutting out of wires from the femoral head was observed in 3 (4,7%) cases. Totally 61 complication were revealed. In the second group of the patients non-union was found in one patient (64 years old). Complications were observed in 6 patients of this group — pint-tract infection, moderate secondary displacement of the fragments (the patient fell down on the operated limb) and wire breakage. Conclusion. The efficiency of the femoral neck osteosynthesis with application of elaborated monolateral wire- and half-pin fixator made up 95,7% of the positive outcomes (in osteosynthesis using bunch of wires with llizarov frame fixation the same 60,9% of the positive outcomes).

Keywords: treatment outcomes, osteosynthesis with the bunch of wires, mono-lateral wire- and half-pin fixator, femoral neck, complications

Bibliography:
1. Basov AV, Kazanin КС, Ardashev IP, et al. Femoral neck fracture repair using cannulated screws. Polytrauma 2012; (1): 32-37
2. Shigarev VM, Timofeev VN. Evolution of the femoral neck fracture repair. Genius of Orthopaedics 2007; (3): 75-77
3. Lomtatidze ES, Volchenko DC, Potseluiko CV, et al. Complex evaluation of the outcomes in the surgical treatment of the intra-articular femoral neck fractures. Priorov Newsletter of traumatology and orthopaedics 2005; (3): 11-15
4. Markov АА, Kuznetsov IV, Sergeev KS. Surgical treatment of the femoral neck fracture. Medical Science and Education of Ural 2007; (6): 28-30
5. Markov АА, Kuznetsov IV, Sergeev KS. Comparative evaluation of the internal osteosynthesis and hip joint replacement in the femoral neck fracture. In: Collection of the materials of the Conference dedicated to the 40th anniversary of the faculty of Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Field Surgery of Omsk Medical Academy. «Topical problems of traumatology and orthopaedics». Omsk, 2006; p. 195-200
6. Kuryanov SN. Complex prophylaxis system for non-unions and circulation disorders in femoral neck fractures osteosynthesis. Priorov Newsletter of traumatology and orthopaedics 2008; (1): 19-23
7. Shigarev VM, Boichuk SP. Transosseous controlled os-teosynthesis of the femoral neck fractures. In book: Materials of the Scient-Pract. Conference with Intern. Participation dedicated to 90-years anniversary of G.A. Ilizarov, 60-years anniversary of Ilizarov method, 40-years anniversary of RISC "RTO" «Ilizarov readings». Kurgan, 2011; p. 283
8. Belinov NV. Evolution of operative technique of the femoral neck fracture treatment. Siberian Medical Journal 2013; (5): 22-25
9. Lazarev AF. Proximal femoral fracture repair. In: Collection of abstracts of II Congress of Traumatology and Orthopaedics «Traumatology and Orthopaedics in the Capital: Present and Future». M., 2014; p. 149
10. Pat. 12284783 RF, МРК7 А61В17/58. Technique of operative treatment of medial femoral neck fractures. Du-brovin GM., Kovalev PV., Kovaleva EA., et al. Applicant and patent holder — Kovalev PV. № 2005106753/14; appl. 09.03.2005; publ. 10.10.2006. Bui. № 28
11. Pat. 2139002 RF, МРК7 А61В17/56, А61В17/58. Technique of surgical treatment of the proximal femoral fractures. Lazarev AF, Solod El. Applicant and patent holder — Educational Scientific Center of the Medical Center of Administrative Department of the President of the Russian Federation; appl. 27.10.1997; publ. 10.10.1999
12. Pat. 120354 RF, МРК7 А61В17/60. Device for treatment of the patients with proximal femoral fractures and their sequelae. Soldatov YP, Allakhverdiev AC. Applicant and patent holder — RISC "RTO". № 2011154195/14; appl. 28.12.2011; publ. 20.09.12. Bui. № 26
13. Allakhverdiev AS, Soldatov YP. Monolateral wire and half-pin fixator for osteosynthesis of proximal femoral fractures and their sequelae. Genius of Orthopedics 2013; (3): 77-79
14. Shevtsov VI., Shved SI., Sysenko YM. Transosseous osteosynthesis in comminuted fractures. Kurgan: DAM-MI, 2002; p. 244-245
15. Yefimov DN. Operative treatment of the patients with femoral neck fracture and pseudarthrosis. In book: material of the Conference «Post-graduate students readings: Current problems of post-graduate education». Kurgan, 2011; p. 48-50
16. Shugol GB., Demakov SL. Comparative trials of the models for femoral neck fracture. In book: Jubilee collect, of scient. works 1951-2006. «Topical problems of modern diagnostics and treatment». Ekaterinbourg, 2006; p. 67-70.

AttachmentSize
2014_04_627-635.pdf1.74 MB
All articles of the authors: Soldatov Yu.P. , Allakhverdiev A.S.

No votes yet