Saratov JOURNAL of Medical and Scientific Research

Methodology of advanced medical information registries design

Year: 2018, volume 14 Issue: №3 Pages: 434-437
Heading: Health Service Organization Article type: Original article
Authors: Fedonnikov A.S., Kolesnikova A.S., Rozhkova Yu.Yu., Kirillova I.V., Bessonov L.V., Ulyanov V.Yu., Kossovich L.Yu.
Organization: Saratov State Medical University

Aim: development of information exchange methodology between the main participants of health branch in providing of medical care for traumatology and orthopedic patients at the base of specialized registers design. Material and Methods. Analysis and systematization of 31 registers of medical information in the field of traumatology and orthopedics functionality placed in Federal Institute of Industrial Property, European Patent databases, developers' web-sites were made. Search depth was designated from 1979 and was defined by the date of the earlier found information source. Results. Analysis of specialized registries has shown that most of it (70.9%) are mono-nosological and contain information about diagnostic and treatment measures provided at the level of a medical institution. It was developed a methodology of specialized registry of medical information functionality including the information of applied medical devices, pharmaceutical preparations, medical technologies, rehabilitation programs, medical care evaluation results methodology which let operate with the data forming in information systems of the main health branch participants. Conclusion. Proposed information exchange methodology determines the necessity of integrated target-oriented registry development. Its practical use let increase management decisions quality influencing the achievement of health branch participants objectives.

1. Yagudina Rl, Litvinenko MM, Sorokovikov IV. Patient registers: structure, functions, use possibilities. Farmakoehkonomika. Modern pharmacoeconomics and pharmacoepidemiology 2011; 4(4): 3-7
2. Gliklich RE, Dreyer NA, Leavy M.B. Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes: A User's Guide [Internet]. 3rd edition. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US), 2014; 309 p. 3. Webster's English Dictionary, (September 17, 2018
4. Brooke EM. The current and future use of registers in health information systems. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1974. Publication No. 8
5. National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics, 2012
6. Dokholyan RS, Muhlbaier LH, Falletta JM, et al. Regulatory and ethical considerations for linking clinical and administrative databases 2009; 157 (6): 971-82
7. Hammill BG., Hernandez AF, Peterson ED, et al. Linking inpatient clinical registry data to Medicare claims data using indirect identifiers 2009; 157 (6): 995-1000
8. The Bone and Joint Decade; Global Alliance for Musculoskeletal Health. Key facts from the Global Burden of Disease 2012. (21.09.2018)
9. Woolf AD, Pfleger B. Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2003; (819): 646-56
10. Donabedian A. The definition of quality and approaches to its assessment. In: Explorations in Quality Assessment and Monitoring. Vol. 1; p. 95-9. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Health Administration Press, 1980; 478 p.
11. Wang W, Sun M, Xu Z, et al. The low back pain in patients with hip osteoarthritis: current knowledge on the diagnosis, mechanism and treatment outcome. Ann Joint 2016; 1 (9): 1-5
12. Devin CJ, Mccullough KA, Morris BJ, Kang J. Hip-spine Syndrome. Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 2012; 20 (7): 434-42
13. Matsuyama Y. Hip-spine syndrome: total sagittal alignment of the spine and clinical symptoms in patients with bilateral congenital hip dislocation. Spine 2004; 29: 2432-7.

2018_3_434-437.pdf513.85 KB

No votes yet