X-ray, anatomical and biomechanical features in patients with developmental hip dislocation
Year: 2014, volume 10 Issue: №1 Pages: 114-119
Heading: Traumatology and Orthopedics Article type: Original article
Authors: Yusupov K.S., Anisimova Е.А., Pavlenko N.N., Letov A.S., Zaychev V.A., Emkyzhev O.L., Zotkin V.V., Markov D.A.
Organization: Saratov State Medical University
Heading: Traumatology and Orthopedics Article type: Original article
Authors: Yusupov K.S., Anisimova Е.А., Pavlenko N.N., Letov A.S., Zaychev V.A., Emkyzhev O.L., Zotkin V.V., Markov D.A.
Organization: Saratov State Medical University
Summary:
The Pupose: to analyze X-ray, anatomical and biomechanical features in patients with developmental hip dislocation. Material and Methods. The study included 73 patients (57 women and 16 men) with the developmental hip dislocation at the age of 31 to 76 years. The clinical method, X-ray, gait analysis and visual analogue scale VAS, McGill inquiry. Results. The comparative analysis of X-ray, anatomic and biomechanical features in patients with different severity of developmental hip dislocation. Conclusion. Features of the functional status of patients with different severity of developmental hip dislocation enable to predict the tactics of surgical treatment and individual rehabilitation program.
Keywords: biomechanical gait analysis, developmental dislocation of the hip, total endoprosthesis, X-ray parameters
Bibliography:
1. Tikhilov RM, Shapovalov VM. Guide to hip arthroplasty. SPb: Meditsina, 2008; 325 p.;
2. Clinical guidelines: Osteoarthritis. Diagnosis and management of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee and hip joints. O.M. Lesnyak eds. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2006; 176 p.;
3. Harofilakidis G, Karachalios Т. Total Hip Arthroplasty for congenital Hip Disease. J Bone Joint Surgery Amer 2004; 86 (2): 242-250;
4. AntolicV, Kralj-lglic V, IglicA, Pompe B. Hip biomechanics in orthopaedic clinical practice. Cell Mol Biol Lett 2002; 7 (2): 311-315;
5. Boyle MJ, Frampton CM, Grawford HA. Early results of total hip arthroplasty in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip compared with patients with osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty 2012;27:386-390;
6. Slobodskoy AB, Lezhnev AG, Badak IS, et al. Medium-term results of primary hip joint replacement with Zimmer implants, providing cement-retained restoration and cement-free restoration. Travmatologia i Ortopedia Rossii 2011; (2): 44-49;
7. Leunig М, Robetson W, Ganz R. Femoroacetabular impingement: diagnosis, management, including open surgical technique. Open Tech Sports Med 2007; 15: 178-182;
8. Bowman KF Jr, Fox J, Sekiya JK. A clinically relevant review of hip biomechanics. Arthroscopy 2010; 26 (8): 1118-1129;
9. Skvortsov DV. Diagnosis of motor pathology instrumental methods: gait analysis, stabilometry. Moscow: MBN, 2007; 640 p.;
10. Illyes A, Kiss RM. Gait analysis of patterns with osteoarthritis of the hip joint. Facta universitatis 2010; 3 (1): 1-9;
11. Letov AS, Barabash YuA, Markov DA, et al. Biomechanical and neuro-physiological assessment of methodics effectiveness of total endoprosthesis of hip joint. Tambov University reports. Series: Natural and Technical sciences 2012; 17 (5): 1433-1440;
12. Yefimov АР. Clinically significant parameters of gait. Travmatologia i Ortopedia Rossii 2012; (1): 60-65.
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| 2014_01_114-119.pdf | 616.39 KB |
Русский
English