Saratov JOURNAL of Medical and Scientific Research

Analysis of the results of implanting intraocular lens with low-addition power and asymmetric optics

Year: 2020, volume 16 Issue: №2 Pages: 628-632
Heading: Ophtalmology Article type: Original article
Authors: Nenasheva Yu.V., Fabrikantov O.L.
Organization: S. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution, Tambov State University n. a. G.R. Derzhavin
Summary:

The purpose of the study is to analyze clinical and functional treatment outcomes and usefulness of visual rehabilitation in patients implanted with IOL Lentis Comfort. Material and Methods. 64 patients were examined. Patients of group one underwent cataract phacoemulsification with IOL Lentis Comfort implantation, patients of group two were implanted with IOL Acrysof Restor. Non-corrected and corrected distance visual acuity, for intermediate distance (70 sm) and near visual acuity (30-40 sm) were examined on the 2nd day, in a month and in 6 months postoperatively. In 6 months after surgery subjective assessment of patients' satisfaction with the quality of vision was conducted using a questionnaire. Results. High distance visual acuity was revealed in both groups, visual acuity for intermediate distance was significantly higher in patients of group one, near visual acuity was higher in patients of group two. According to the questionnaire results patients of both groups did not experience difficulties in working and driving during the day, at night, patients of group two were much more likely to report difficulties in driving a car and undesirable light phenomena. Conclusion. Implantation of IOL with low-addition power and asymmetric optics provides high quality vision at various distances. The low level of undesirable light phenomena contributes to rapid adaptation of patients in the postoperative period.

Bibliography:
1. Boriskina LN, Dzhashi BG, Marsheva OB, Isakova IA. ECCE and ICCE. Forgotten technologies and methods of choice in surgical treatment of complicated cataract. In: Modern technologies in cataract and refractive surgery: Collected papers. Moscow, 2011; p. 55-60.
2. Buratto L. Cataract surgery: Transition from extracapsular extraction to phacoemulsification/Translated from English. Fabiano Editore, 1999; 474 p.
3. Malyugin BE. Cataract surgery and intraocular aphakia correction: progress, problems and prospects. Annals of Ophthalmology 2006; 122 (1): 37-41.
4. Dzhashi BG, Serkov YuS, Shchava Al. Experience of IOL application with extended focus depth zone. Annals of Tambov University 2017; 22 (4):643-5.
5. Ivashina Al, Gudechkov VB, Bessarabov AN, et al. A method of choice of surgical correction of hypermetropia. Ophthalmosurgery 1996; (1): 58-61.
6. Malyugin BE, Timoshkina NT, Andronov SI, et al. Phacoemulsification with IOL implantation on the eyes with a narrow pupil. Ophthalmosurgery 1997; (2): 25-32.
7. Vlasov AV, Tereshchenko YuA, Sokolov KV, Krivko SV. Comparative analysis of the postoperative optical effect in patients undergone cataract extraction with different types of multifocal lOLs. In: Modern technologies in cataract and refractive surgery: Collected papers. Moscow, 2009; p. 62-6.
8. Iskakov IA, Koronkevich VP, Lenkova GA, et al. Native bifocal diffraction-refracting intraocular lens: construction, optical characteristics. Annals of OSU 2007; (12): 85-8.
9. Temirov NN, Temirov NE. Multifocal low-addition IOL in correcting aphakia of different genesis. Modern Technologies in Ophthalmology 2016; (5): 87-9.
10. Temirov NN. Correcting aphakia of different genesis with multifocal intraocular lenses with asymmetric rotational optics: PhD abstract. Moscow, 2015; 17 p.

AttachmentSize
2020_02-1_628-632.pdf408.87 KB

No votes yet