Saratov JOURNAL of Medical and Scientific Research

Deep anterior keratoplasty in the treatment of keratoconus

Year: 2020, volume 16 Issue: №2 Pages: 619-623
Heading: Ophtalmology Article type: Original article
Authors: Lev I.V., Fabrikantov O.L.
Organization: S. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution, Tambov State University n. a. G.R. Derzhavin
Summary:

The purpose of the study is to estimate the results of deep anterior keratoplasty in the treatment of keratoconus during the period of time from 2016 to 2020 based on Tambov branch data. Material and Methods. The main group included 26 patients (28 eyes) diagnosed with III-IV degree keratoconus and undergone deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK). The control group included 11 patients (12 eyes) with penetrating keratoplasty (PK). All patients underwent ophthalmologic examination before and after surgery, including routine and special (keratotopography, keratopachym-etry, endothelial biomicroscopy) methods of examination. Results. The prevalence of keratoconus in Tambov region is 0.59%, moreover keratoconus occurs in men 2 times more often than in women. Transparent engraftment of the transparent cornea was obtained in 100% of DALKs and only in 84% of PKs. In the group of patients with PK all changes in corrected visual acuity were statistically insignificant, while in the group of patients with DALK they were significant at all stages of examination. One year after surgery the corrected visual acuity was 0.64±0.23 and 0.57±0.27 in the main and control groups correspondingly (p<0.05). The endothelial cell loss one year after surgery was 10.5 and 5.1% following DALR and PK correspondingly (p<0.05). Conclusion. The analysis of DALK and PK outcomes in patients with keratoconus shows that DALK is characterized by shorter period of rehabilitation, absence of rejection reaction, stable visual acuity restoration, and lower rate of endothelial cell loss.

Bibliography:
1. Bikbov MM, Bikbova GM. Corneal ectasia. Moscow: Ophthalmology, 2011, 164 p.
2. Rabinowitz YS. Keratoconus. Surv Ophthalmol 1998; 42 (4): 297-319.
3. Shchuko AG, Balzhirova EM-Zh, Yuryeva TN, et al. Modern conceptions of etiopathogenesis and treatment mechanisms of primary and secondary keratectasias. Practical Medicine 2017; 110 (9): 267-71.
4. Solodkova EG, Remesnikov IA. Modern approaches in the treatment progressive keratectasia. Practical Medicine 2012; 59 (4): 75-79.
5. Fontana L, Parente G, Tassinari G. Clinical outcomes after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty using the big-bubble technique in patients with keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol 2007; 143(1): 117-24.
6. Trufanov SV, Subbot AM, Malozhen SA, et al. Corneal graft rejection after keratoplasty. Ophthalmology in Russia 2017; 14 (3): 180-7.
7. Amsler М. La notion du keratocone. Bull Soc Franc Ophtalmol 1951; 64: 272-5.
8. Anwar M, Teichmann K. Big-bubble technique to bare Descemet's membrane in anterior lamellar keratoplasty. J Cataract Refrac Surg 2002; 28 (3): 398-403.
9. Malyugin BE, Izmailova SB, Aiba ЕЕ, et al. Comparative analysis of clinical and functional outcomes of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus patients. Ophthalmosurgery 2013; (4): 44-9.
10. Gundorova RA, Chentsova EV, Khodjabekyan NV, et al. Potentials of anterior layerwise femtolaser keratoplasty. Rus J Ophthalmol 2012; 2: 24-8.
11. Malyugin BE, Pashtaev AN, Elacov UN, et al. Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty assisted by the femtosecond laser IntraLase 60 kHz: the first experience. Practical Medicine 2012; 59 (4): 100-3.
12. Beloedova AV, Antonova OP, Malyugin BE. Femto-assisted deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty with intrastormal tunnels for «big bubble» technique in patients with keratoconu:. First clinical-functional results. Practical Medicine 2018; 16 (4): 13-7.
13. Suk-Kyue С, Jin-Hyoung К, Doh L. The Effect of Femtosecond Laser Lamellar Dissection at Various Depths on Corneal Endothelium in the Recipient Bed of the Porcine Eye. Ophthalmic Surgery, Lasers & Imaging 2010; 41 (2): 255-60.

AttachmentSize
2020_02-1_619-623.pdf379.83 KB

No votes yet