Mathematical modeling-based choice of conservative treatment of myopia
Year: 2020, volume 16 Issue: №2 Pages: 565-569
Heading: Ophtalmology Article type: Original article
Authors: Aprelev А.Е., Setko N.P., Begun D.N., Yasin I.A.
Organization: Orenburg State Medical University
Heading: Ophtalmology Article type: Original article
Authors: Aprelev А.Е., Setko N.P., Begun D.N., Yasin I.A.
Organization: Orenburg State Medical University
Summary:
The purpose of the study is to develop a method for selecting the most effective conservative method of treating myopia using mathematical modeling. Material and Methods. The study included data on treatment of two groups of patients (n=141) aged 12 to 17 years with mild and moderate acquired (school) myopia, who used various combined methods of conservative treatment of myopia. Mathematical modeling was based on the method of constructing classification trees. Results. A method has been developed for selecting the most effective conservative treatment of myopia with a good sensitivity of 84% and specificity of 74%. Prediction models formed the basis of a computer program designed to determine the most effective method of conservative treatment of myopia based on the most informative data: patient's medical history, initial visual indicators, integral index of vegetative status (intensity index) and initial vegetative status, results of psychological evaluation of the symptoms by the patient. Conclusion. The use of computer technologies makes it possible to optimize the choice of an adequate method of treating myopia with the exception of subjective factor.
Keywords: mathematical modelling, choice of myopia treatment
Bibliography:
1. Tarutta ЕР, lomdina EN, Tarasova NA, et al. An integrated approach to the prevention and treatment of progressive myopia in schoolchildren. RMJ: Clinical Ophthalmology 2018; (2): 70-6.
2. Grzybowski A, Kanclerz Р, Tsubota К, et al. A review on the epidemiology of myopia in school children worldwide. ВМС Ophthalmology 2020; (1): 27.
3. Holden BA, Fricke TR, Wilson DA, et al. Global Prevalence of Myopia and High Myopia and Temporal Trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmology 2016; (5): 1036-42.
4. Naidoo KS, Fricke TR, Frick KD, et al. Potential lost productivity resulting from the global burden of myopia: systematic review, meta-analysis, and modeling. Ophthalmology 2018; (126): 338-46.
5. Tarutta EP, lomdina EN, Tarasova NA. Non-surgical treatment of progressive myopia. RMJ: Clinical Ophthalmology 2016; (4): 204-10.
6. Verzhanskaya TYu. The use of atropine for the treatment of progressive myopia in children and adolescents. Bulletin of Ophthalmology 2017; (3): 89-98.
7. Wan L, Wei СС, Chen CS, et al. The Synergistic Effects of Orthokeratology and Atropine in Slowing the Progression of Myopia. J Clin Med 2018; (9): 259.
8. Shang X, Chen L, Litscher G, et al. Acupuncture and Lifestyle Myopia in Primary School Children-Results from a Transcontinental Pilot Study Performed in Comparison to Moxibustion. Medicines (Basel) 2018; 5 (3): 7-15.
9. Kanyukov VN, Ekimov AK. Modeling in healthcare management. Orenburg, 2010; 564 p.
10. Demyanov VF, Demyanova VV, Kokorina AV, Moiseenko VM. Predicting the effectiveness of chemotherapy in the treatment of cancer. Vestnik of S-Petersb. University. Series 10: Applied mathematics, computer science, management processes 2006; 4: 30-6.
11. Gafanovich EYa. Formalization of the description of components of the prognostic model of inpatient treatment of arterial hypertension. System Analysis and Management in Biomedical Systems 2009; 8: (2): 490-2.
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| 2020_02-1_565-569.pdf | 1.02 MB |
Русский
English