Informativity of microperimetry in retinal pathology diagnosis
Year: 2020, volume 16 Issue: №1 Pages: 249-253
Heading: Ophtalmology Article type: Original article
Authors: Pilyagina А.А., Nenasheva Yu.V., Fabrikantov O.L.
Organization: S. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution, Tambov State University n. a. G.R. Derzhavin
Heading: Ophtalmology Article type: Original article
Authors: Pilyagina А.А., Nenasheva Yu.V., Fabrikantov O.L.
Organization: S. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution, Tambov State University n. a. G.R. Derzhavin
Summary:
The purpose of the study is to estimate the functional status of central retinal zone with microperimetry method in patients with retinal pathology. Material and Methods. Microperimetry was performed on 16 patients (18 eyes) with different kinds of retinal pathology including thrombosis of central retinal vein branches, age-related macular degeneration, myopic maculopathy, lamellar macular hole, tapetoretinal degeneration, ocular albinism, central serous chorireti-nopathy, proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Mean age was 52.4 years old; male — 8, female — 8. Results. The average light sensitivity of central retinal zone was reduced in the majority of patients. The decrease in the index of retinal light sensitivity in the pattern point corresponding to fixation point did not correspond to the decrease in the best-corrected visual acuity in all cases. Central defects and depression zones topographically corresponded to pathological alterations on the eye fundus. In a patient with ocular albinism fixation was characterized as unstable, in the rest of cases we observed stable fixation. The analysis of fixation allowed receiving additional information about visual quality and the degree of visuomotor coordination in patients with retinal pathology. Conclusion. As a result of the study we showed high informativity of microperimetry for assessing central retinal zone's functional status in retinal pathology.
Keywords: microperimetry, retinal pathology
Bibliography:
1. Koshelev Dl. Experience of microperimeter MR-1 using in clinical practice. Annals of OSU 2010; (12): 112-4.
2. Lisochkina АВ, Nechiporenko PA. Microperimetry: the advantages of the method and its practical capabilities. Ophthalmology Journal 2009; 2 (1): 18-22.
3. Vorobyeva IV, Merkushenkova DA. Visual field investigation in patients with diabetes mellitus type II. Emergency Medicine 2012; (3): 44-5.
4. Moshetova LK, Arzhimatova GSh, Komarov AV Microperimetry in type I diabetes mellitus. Russian Pediatric Ophthalmology 2013; (2): 32-7.
5. Midena Е. Microperimetry. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol 2006; 81 (4): 183-6.
6. Pedanova EK. Microperimetry in assessing the functional status and complex prognosis of the results of surgical treatment of the patients with idiopathic macular rupture: PhD abstract. Moscow, 2009; 27 p.
7. Abdullaeva EV, Rustambekova GR, Agaeva GG, et al. To the diagnosis of the dry maculodystrophy in myopic diseases. Ophthalmology 2013; 2 (12): 12-6.
8. Bikbov MM, Altynbaev UR, Yarmukhametova AL, et al. Morphofunctional changes of the central retinal area in age-related macular degeneration. Russian Journal of Ophthalmology 2012; 5 (1): 25-8.
9. Tultseva SN, Nechiporenko PA, Titarenko Al. The use of Ozurdex intravitreal implant to treat post-RVO macular edema. Ophthalmology Journal 2014; 7 (3): 5-16.
10. Pedanova EK, Klepinina OB, Mayorova AM. Neovascularization in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: short-term outcomes of photodynamic therapy with chlorine E6. Modern Technologies in Ophthalmology 2017; (1): 24-7.
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| 2020_01-2_249-253.pdf | 972.73 KB |
Русский
English