Saratov JOURNAL of Medical and Scientific Research

Optimization of transpedicular spondylosynthesis application for type A3 lesions of the thoracolumbar transition: clinical experimental study

Year: 2019, volume 15 Issue: №2 Pages: 275-283
Heading: Traumatology and Orthopedics Article type: Original article
Authors: Likhachev S.V., Zaretskov V.V., Arsenievich V.B., Shchanitsyn I.N., Shulga A.E., Zaretskov A.V., Ivanov D.V.
Organization: Saratov National Research University n.a. N. G. Chernyshevsky
Summary:

Objective: the optimization of transpedicular systems application for type A3 lesions of the thoracolumbar transition using computer simulation based on the fnite elements method. Material and Methods. The examination data (post-traumatic kyphotic deformation, intensity of pain syndrome, length of operation and extent of blood loss) of 81 prospec-tively enrolled male patients who in 2017–2018 had been operated for Th11-L2 vertebrae simple fractures of А3N0M1 type (AOSpine classifcation). The patients were divided into 3 groups in accordance with the type of intervention performed on them: short-segment (n=42), 8-screws polysegment (n=25) and 6-screws polysegment (n=14). Biome-chanical simulation based on the computer tomography data was performed for each variant of the metal construction arrangement. Results. In the process of biomechanical simulation with all the variants of the instrumented spine 3D- models loading 8-screws construction proved to be the most consistent one, at that the stability of polysegmental constructions exceeds that of bisegmental one by an order. The results of surgical management were evaluated in terms of up to a year following the intervention. The loss was less and the correction worked better with polysegmental fxation despite more complicated initial conditions for the correction compared to those of group 1 Conclusion. Biomechanical simulation shows prerequisites for the development of bisegmental systems instability as the equivalent stresses and peak displacements are higher compared to those of polysegmental fxation. The efciency analysis of application of various transpedicular fxations for type A3 thoracolumbar transition lesions attests to the advantage of polysegmental arrangements of transpedicular systems, at that the implantation of the 6- screws polysegmental system should be considered the frst choice on the number of indices.

Bibliography:
1 Netsvetov PV, Khoudiayev AT, Diachkova GV, Liulin SV. Roentgenometric characteristic of thoracic and lumbar spinal fractures according to CT data at diferent stages of treatment by transpedicular fxation technique. Genij Ortopedii 2007; 1: 69–75
2 Spiegl UJ, Josten C, Devitt BM, Heyde C-E. Incomplete burst fractures of the thoracolumbar spine: a review of literature. Eur Spine J 2017; 26 (12): 3187–98
3 Zaretskov VV, Arsenievich VB, Likhachev SV, et al. A clinical case study of long-term injury of the thoracic and lumbar spine. Pediatric Traumatology, Orthopedics and Reconstructive Surgery 2016; 4 (2): 61–5
4 Dulaev AK, Khan ISh, Dulaeva NM. Causes of anatomical and functional failure of treatment in patients with thoracic and lumbar spine fractures. Spine Surgery 2009; 2: 17–24
5 Ghogawala Z, Martin B, Benzel EC, et al. Comparative efectiveness of ventral vs dorsal surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Neurosurgery 2011; 68 (3): 622–31
6 Likhachev SV, Zaretskov VV, Shulga AE, et al. Injuries to the thoracolumbar junction: bibliometric analysis of English-language literature. Spine Surgery 2018; 15 (4): 52–69
7 Riaz-ur-Rehman, Azmatullah, Azam F, Mushtaq, Shah M. Treatment of traumatic unstable thoracolumbar junction fractures with transpedicular screw fxation. J Pak Med Assoc 2011; 61 (10): 1005–8
8 Rubery PT, Brown R, Prasarn M, et al. Stabilization of 2-Column Thoracolumbar Fractures with Orthoses. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013; 38 (5): E270–5
9 Shulga AE, Zaretskov VV, Ostrovsky VV, et al. Towards the causes of secondary post-traumatic deformations of thoracic and lumbar spine. Saratov Journal of Medical Scientifc Research 2015; 11 (4): 570–5
10 Zaretskov VV, Artemyeva IA. Comparative characteristics of the radiological measurement techniques for chest kyphosis. N. N. Priorov Journal of Traumatology and Orthopedics 1997; 3: 58–9
12 Babkina TA, Savello VE. Signifcance of conventional radiography and computed tomography for assessment of postoperative spine stability in patients with thoracolumbar spinal trauma. Radiology — Practice 2013; 4: 6–14
13 Canbek U, Karapijnar L, Imerci A, et al. Posterior fx-ation of thoracolumbar burst fractures: is it possible to protect one segment in the lumbar region? Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2014; 24 (4): 459–65
14 Dobran M, Nasi D, Brunozzi D, et al. Treatment of unstable thoracolumbar junction fractures: short-segment pedicle fxation with inclusion of the fracture level versus long-segment instrumentation. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2016; 158 (10): 1883–9
15 Wang H, Mo Z, Han J, et al. Extent and location of fx-ation afects the biomechanical stability of short- or long-segment pedicle screw technique with screwing of fractured vertebra for the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018; 97 (26): e11244
16 McDonnell M, Shah KN, Paller DJ, et al. Biomechan-ical Analysis of Pedicle Screw Fixation for Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures. Orthopedics 2016; 39 (3): e514–8
17 Couvertier M, Germaneau A, Saget M, et al. Biome-chanical analysis of the thoracolumbar spine under physiological loadings: Experimental motion data corridors for validation of fnite element models. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part H J Eng Med 2017; 231 (10): 975–81
18 Wang H, Zhao Y, Mo Z, et al. Comparison of short-segment monoaxial and polyaxial pedicle screw fxation combined with intermediate screws in traumatic thoracolumbar fractures: a fnite element study and clinical radiographic review. Clinics 2017; 72 (10): 609–17
19 Wu C–C, Jin H-M, Yan Y-Z, et al. Biomechanical Role of the Thoracolumbar Ligaments of the Posterior Ligamentous Complex: A Finite Element Study. World Neurosurg 2018; 112: e125–33.

AttachmentSize
2019_02_275-283.pdf1.7 MB

No votes yet