Saratov JOURNAL of Medical and Scientific Research

Pregnancy and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

Year: 2019, volume 15 Issue: №1 Pages: 19-23
Heading: Obstetrics and Gynecology Article type: Review
Authors: Yakovleva O.V., Glukhova T.N., Rogozhina I.E., Skupova I.N.
Organization: Saratov State Medical University

The review of literature is devoted to the problem of cervical intraepithelial dysplasia in pregnant women. For the analysis, publications in the PubMed from 2013 till 2018 database were used.

1 Sushinskaya TV, Zhordania Kl, Payanidi YuG. Analytical aspects of cancer in the female population of Russia. Gynecologic Oncology 2015; (3): 40-3.
2 КдггЬегд С, Brflnnstrom М, Strander В. Colposcopically directed cervical biopsy during pregnancy; minor surgical and obstetrical complications and high rates of persistence and regression. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2013; 92 (6): 692-9
3 Al-Halal H, Kezouh A, Abenhaim HA. Incidence and obstetrical outcomes of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical cancer in pregnancy: a population-based study on 8.8 million births. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2013; 287 (2): 245-50
4 Liu P, Xu L, Sun Y, et al. The prevalence and risk of human papillomavirus infection in pregnant women. Epidemiol Infect 2014; 142(8): 1567-78
5 Kaur H, Schmidt-Grimminger D, Remmenga SW, et al. Does human papillomavirus affect pregnancy outcomes? An analysis of hospital data 2012-2014. Int J Women's Health Wellness2015. DOI: 10.23937/2474-1353/1510006
6 WHO guidelines. Guidelines for screening and treatment of precancerous lesions for cervical cancer prevention. November 2013, page 58 URL: guidelines-screen ing-and-treatment-precance rous-lesions-cervical-cancer-prevention. 7 Final update summary: cervical cancer: screening — us preventive services task force. URL: https:// UpdateSummaryFinal/cervical-cancer-screening2-4k-2018- 10-10
8 Small WJr, Bacon MA, Bajaj A, et al. Cervical cancer: A global health crisis. Cancer 2017 Jul 1; 123 (13): 2404- 12 DOI: 10.1002/СПСГ.30667. Epub 2017 May 2
9 Kim YH, Park JS, Norwitz ER, et al. Genotypic prevalence of human papillomavirus infection during normal pregnancy: A cross-sectional study. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2014; 40: 200-7. DOI: 10.1111/jog. 12155
10 Brun-Micaleff E, Coffy A, Rey V, et al. Cervical cancer screening by cytology and human papillomavirus testing during pregnancy in French women with poor adhesion to regular cervical screening. J Med Virol 2014; 86 (3): 536-45
11 Kaur H, Schmidt-Grimminger D, Remmenga SW, et al. Does human papillomavirus affect pregnancy outcomes? An analysis of hospital data 2012-2014. Int J Women's Health Wellness2015. DOI: 10.23937/2474- 1353/1510006
12 Nimrodi M, Kleitman V, Wainstock T, et al. The association between cervical inflammation and histologic evidence of HPV in PAP smears and adverse pregnancy outcome in low risk population. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2018 Jun; 225: 160-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.04.023. Epub 2018 Apr 20 URL: (18) 30190-8/fulltext
13 Arbyn M, Xu L, Simoens C, et al. Prophylactic vaccination against human papillomaviruses to prevent cervical cancer and its precursors. Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2018, Issue 5 Art. No.: CD009069. DOI: 10.1002/14651858. CD009069.pub3
14 Lipkind HS, Vazquez-Benitez G, Nordin JD, et al. Maternal and infant outcomes after human papillomavirus vaccination in the periconceptional period or during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2017 Sep; 130 (3): 599-608. DOI: 10.1097/ AOG.0000000000002191
15 Kharbanda EO, Vazquez-Benitez G, Lipkind HS, et al. Risk of spontaneous abortion after inadvertent human papillomavirus vaccination in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2018; 132 (1): 35-44. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002694. 16 Lawton B, Howe AS, Turner N, et al. Association of prior HPV vaccination with reduced preterm birth: A population based study. Vaccine 2018 Jan 2; 36 (1): 134-40. DOI: 10.1016/j. vaccine.2017.11.020. Epub 2017 Nov 27
17 Hernandez PB, Valenzuela MG, ER Moreno et al. Lower genital tract infection by HPV: correlation with HPV: induced trophoblastic dysfunction in late preterm birth. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014; 44: 68-8. DOI: 10.1002/uog.13656
18 Siristatidis C, Vaidakis D, Sertedaki E, et al. The possible effect of HPV infection on IVF outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2017; 50: 240-4. DOI: 10.1002/uog.18264
19 Siristatidis C, Vaidakis D, Sertedaki E, et al. Effect of human papillomavirus infection on in-vitro fertilization outcome: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2018;51:87-93. DOI: 10.1002/uog.17550
20 Trottier H, Mayrand M H, Coutlee F, et al. Human papillomavirus (HPV) perinatal transmission and risk of HPV persistence among children: Design, methods and preliminary results of the HERITAGE study. Papillomavirus Res 2016 Dec; 2: 145-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.pvr.2016.07.001. Epub 2016 Jul 12
21 Origoni M, Salvatore S, Perino A, et al. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in pregnancy: the state of the art. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2014; 18 (6): 851-60
22 Coppolillo EF, De Ruda Vega HM, et al. High-grade cervical neoplasia during pregnancy: diagnosis, management and postpartum findings. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2013; 92 (3): 293-7
23 Trottier H, Mayrand MH, Baggio ML, et al. Risk of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and cervical neoplasia after pregnancy. ВМС Pregnancy Childbirth 2015 Oct 7; 15: 244 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-015-0675-0. URL: pubmed/26446835
24 Dufloth RM, Vieira LF, Xavier Jynior JC,etal. Frequency of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) for pregnant and non-pregnant women. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2015; 37 (5). URL: S0100-720320150005295
25 Xavier-Jbnior JC, Vale DB, Vieira LF, et al. Results of screening for cervical cancer among pregnant and non- pregnant women in Brazil. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2015 Jul; 130 (1): 36-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.01.016. Epub 2015 Apr 1
26 Pruski D, Malkowska-Walczak B, Paluszkiewicz A, et al. The incidence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in a population of pregnant women with an abnormal cytology. Ginekol Pol 2017; 88 (1): 20-3. DOI: 10.5603/GP.a2017.0004
27 He Y, Wu Y, Zhao Q, et al. HR-HPV management in pregnancy with CIN. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2014; 40: 538-44. DOI: 10.1111/jog.12192.
8 28 Ciavattini A, Sopracordevole F, Di Giuseppe J, et al. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in pregnancy: Interference of pregnancy status with p16 and Ki-67 protein expression. Oncol Lett 2017 Jan; 13 (1): 301-6. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2016.5441. Epub 2016Nov29
29 Schuster S, Joura E, Kohlberger P. Natural history of squamous intraepithelial lesions in pregnancy and mode of delivery. Anticancer Res 2018; 38 (4): 2439-42. DOI: 10.21873/ anticanres.12496
30 Siegler E, Lavie O, Amit A, et al. Should the risk of invasive cancer in pregnancy and the safety of loop electrosurgical excision procedure during the first 15 weeks change our practice? J Low Genit Tract Dis 2017 Oct; 21 (4): 299-303. DOI: 10.1097/ LGT0000000000000346
31 Mailath-Pokorny M, Schwameis R, Grimm C, et al. Natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in pregnancy: postpartum histo-pathologic outcome and review of the literature. ВМС Pregnancy Childbirth 2016 Apr 7; 16: 74 DOI: 10.1186/ s12884-016-0861-8
32 Kyrgiou M, Mitra A, Arbyn M, et al. Fertility and early pregnancy outcomes after conservative treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; (9): CD008478. DOI: 10,1002/14651858. CD008478.pub2
33 Jin G. Pregnancy outcome following loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2014; 289 (1): 85-9
34 Conner SN, Frey HA, Cahill AG, et al. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure and risk of preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123 (4): 752-61. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000174
35 Miller ES, Sakowicz A, Grobman WA. The association between cervical dysplasia, a short cervix, and preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213: 543.e1-4.
36 Gatta LA, Kuller JA, Rhee EHJ. Pregnancy outcomes following cervical conization or loop electrosurgical excision procedures. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2017 Aug; 72 (8): 494-9. DOI: 10.1097/OGX.0000000000000468
37 Kyrgiou M, Athanasiou A, Kalliala IEJ, et al. Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for cervical intraepithelial lesions and early invasive disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017, Issue 11 Art. No.: CD012847. DOI: 10.1002/14651858. CD012847
38 Liu Y, Qiu H F, Tang Y, et al. Pregnancy outcome after the treatment of loop electrosurgical excision procedure or cold-knife conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Gynecologic and obstetric investigation 2014; 77 (4): 240-4 added to CENTRAL: 31 August 2014 | 2014 Issue 8 DOI: https://
39 Zebitay AG, Gungor ES, llhan G, et al. Cervical conization and the risk of preterm birth: a population-based multicentrictrial of Turkish cohort. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research 2017; 11 (3), QC21-QC24 | added to CENTRAL: 30 April 2017 | 2017 Issue 4 DOI: JCDR/2017/22996.9495
40 Pinborg A, Ortoft G, Loft A, et al. Cervical conization doubles the risk of preterm and very preterm birth in assisted reproductive technology twin pregnancies. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England) 2015; 30 (1): 197-204. DOI: https:// .

2019_1_019-023.pdf266.17 KB

No votes yet