Saratov JOURNAL of Medical and Scientific Research

Effect of different pancreatic stump closure techniques during distal pancreatectomy to the frequency and severity of acute postoperative pancreatitis

Year: 2018, volume 14 Issue: №2 Pages: 260-265
Heading: Surgery Article type: Original article
Authors: Voskanyan S.E., Naydenov E.V., Uteshev l.Yu., Artemiev A.l.
Organization: State Scientific Research Center n.a. A.I. Burnasyan — Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency
Summary:

The Aim: to study the effect of different pancreatic stump closure techniques, including depending on the diameter of the main pancreatic duct to frequency and severity of acute postoperative pancreatitis after distal pancreatectomy. Material and Methods. Distal pancreatectomies were performed in 126 patients with neoplasms of the body and/or tail of the pancreas. Patients were divided into 4 groups depending on the pancreatic stump closure techniques. Group 1 (control): isolated suturing of the main pancreatic duct of the pancreatic stump with its sealing by gastrocolic omentum or hemostatic sponge; group 2: isolated suturing of the main pancreatic duct of the pancreatic stump with its sealing by biological glue 2-octylcyanoacrylate; group 3: pancreatic stump closure were performed by Endoscopic Linear Cutter; group 4: after distal pancreatectomy were performed external transduodenal transnasal drainage of the enlarged main pancreatic duct of pancreatic stump. Results. The frequency of acute postoperative pancreatitis in the control group of patients was 45.8%, in the group 2 of patients — 44.4%, in the group 3 of patients — 9.7%, in the group 4 of patients — 15.0%. The use of the proposed pancreatic stump closure techniques after distal pancreatectomy resulted in a decrease of the frequency of moderate form of acute postoperative pancreatitis. The use of Endoscopic Linear Cutter and external transduodenal transnasal drainage of the enlarged main pancreatic duct resulted in decrease of frequency of acute postoperative pancreatitis in patients with a diameter of the main pancreatic duct of the pancreatic stump up to 5 mm. Conclusion. The use of the proposed pancreatic stump closure techniques after distal pancreatectomy resulted in the decrease of frequency and severity of acute postoperative pancreatitis.

Bibliography:
1. Lyadov VK, Novozhilov NV. Drug therapy after operations on the pancreas. Poliklinika 2015; 1 (1): 21-5
2. Ejaz A, Sachs T, He J, Spolverato G, Hirose K, Ahuja N, Wolfgang CL, Makary MA, Weiss M, Pawlik TM. A comparison of open and minimally invasive surgery for hepatic and pancreatic resections using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Surgery 2014; 156: 538-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.03.046
3. Justin V, Fingerhut A, Khatkov I, Uranues S. Laparoscopic pancreatic resection: a review. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 1: 36. DOI: 10.21037/tgh.2016.04.02
4. Mehrabi A, Hafezi M, Arvin J, Esmaelizadeh M, Garoussi C, Emami G, Kossler-Ebs J, Muller-Stich BP, Buchler MW, Hackert T, Diener MK. A systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for benign and malignant lesions of the pancreas: it's time to randomize. Surgery 2015; 157(1): 45-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.06.081
5. Onopriev VI, Korot'ko GF, Rogal VL, Voskanyan SE. Pancreatoduodenectomy (aspects of the surgical technique, the functional consequences). Krasnodar, 2005; 135 p.
6. Voskanyan SE. Morphofunctional organization of the pancreas and clinical-experimental aspects of acute postoperative pancreatitis: DSc abstract. Moscow, 2013; 48 p.
7. Voskanyan SE, Korsakov IN, Naydenov EV Prophylaxis of Acute Postoperative Pancreatitis in Pancreas Cancer Surgery. Annals of Surgical Hepatology 2013; 18 (2): 95-102
8. Voskanyan SE, Zabelin MV, Naydenov EV, Artemiev Al, Uteshev lYu. Results of the complex prevention of the acute postoperative pancreatitis after direct operations on the pancreas. Annals of Surgery 2015; (6): 14-9
9. Krieger AG, Kubishkin VA, Karmazanovskiy GG, et al. The postoperative pancreatitis after the pancreatic surgery. Surgery 2012; (4): 14-9
10. Vichuzhanin DV, Egorov AV, Levkin VV, Kharlov NS, Stepanov SN. The diagnostics and prevention of the postoperative pancreatitis. Surgery 2012; (4): 63-9
11. Voskanyan SE, Korot'ko GF. Morphofunctional organization of the pancreas and acute postoperative pancreatitis (experimental and clinical aspects). Moscow: Litterra, 2017; 528 p.
12. Laaninen М., Blauer М., Vasama К., Jin Н., Raty S., Sand J., Nordback I., Laukkarinen J. The risk for immediate postoperative complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy is increased by high frequency of acinar cells and decreased by prevalent fibrosis of the cut edge of pancreas. Pancreas 2012; 41 (6): 957-61
13. Bassi O, DervenisO, Butturini G., Fingerhut A., Yeo C, Izbicki J., Neoptolemos J., Sarr M., Traverso W., Buchler M., for the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula Definition Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula: An international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 2005; 138 (1): 8-13
14. Lermite E., Sommacale D., Piardi T, Arnaud J.P, Sauvanet A., Dejong OH., Pessaux P. Complications after pancreatic resection: diagnosis, prevention and management. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 2013; 37 (3): 230-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinre.2013.01.003
15. Kriger AG, Berelavichus SV, Smirnov AV, Gorin DS, Akhtanin EA. Comparative results of open robot-assisted and laparoscopic distal pancreatic resection. Journal Surgery n.a. N.I. Pirogov 2015; (1): 23-9
16. Voskanyan SE, Kotenko KV, Korsakov IN, Naydenov EV. Predicting of the development of acute pancreatitis as a complication after surgery on the pancreas. Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology 2014; 9 (109): 61-8
17. Rebrova OYu. Once Again, on the Quality of Statistical Analysis in Medical Publications: Current Status of the Problem, Recommendations, Peer Reviewing. Medical Technologies: Assessment and Choice 2014; 15 (1): 8-10.

AttachmentSize
2018_2_260-2651.pdf652.22 KB

No votes yet