Multimodal evoked potential in monitoring activity relapsing and remitting multiple sclerosis
Year: 2018, volume 14 Issue: №1 Pages: 157-160
Heading: Neurology Article type: Original article
Authors: Poverennova I.E., Zakharov A.V., Khivintseva E.V.
Organization: Samara State Medical University
Heading: Neurology Article type: Original article
Authors: Poverennova I.E., Zakharov A.V., Khivintseva E.V.
Organization: Samara State Medical University
Summary:
The aim of the study was to examine multimodal evoked potential in patients with or without relapse
multiple sclerosis during 12 month. Material and Methods. The study included 32 patients with
established diagnosis of clinically significant multiple sclerosis, a relapsing-remitting course. The EDSS
score was evaluated. All patients underwent a study of multimodal evoked potential. All examined
patients were divided into 2 groups depending on the relapse multiple sclerosis by the end of the year.
Results. Multimodal evoked potentials show ambiguous data on the activity of multiple sclerosis. The
greatest correlation with subsequent activity of multiple sclerosis is shown by stem evoked potentials.
Conclusion. This study is the initial stage in the search for a tool for predicting the course of the disease
in patients with multiple sclerosis. An increase in the group of subjects and inclusion in the analysis of
structural changes in the central nervous system according to magnetic resonance imaging probably will
increase the information content of predictions.
Keywords: Expanded Disability Status Scale, multimodal evoked potential, multiple sclerosis, relapse of multiple sclerosis
Bibliography:
1 Kallmann BA, Fackelmann S, Toyka KV, Rieckmann P, Reiners K. Early abnormalities of evoked potentials and future disability in patients with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2006; 12: 58-65
2 Invernizzi P, Bertolasi L, Bianchi MR, Turatti M, Gajofatto A, Benedetti MD. Prognostic value of multimodal evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis: the EP score. J Neurol 2011; 258: 1933-9
3 Schlaeger R, D'Souza M, Schindler C, Grize L, Kappos L, Fuhr P. Electrophysiological markers and predictors of the disease course in primary progressive multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler2014;20:51-6
4 Schlaeger R, Schindler C, Grise L, et al. Monitoring multiple sclerosis by multimodal evoked potentials:
Numerically versus ordinally scaled scoring systems. Clinical Neurophysiology 2014; 127(3): 1864-71
5 Strimbu K, Tavel JA. What are biomarkers? Curr Opin HIV AIDS 2010; 5: 463-6
6 Leocani L, Rovaris M, Boneschi FM, et al. Multimodal evoked potentials to assess the evolution of multiple
sclerosis: a longitudinal study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2006; 77: 1030-5
7 Di Maggio G, Santangelo R, Guerrieri S, et al. Optical coherence tomography and visual evoked potentials: which is more sensitive in multiple sclerosis? Mult Scler 2014; 20:1342-7
8 Sater RA, Rostami AM, Galetta S, et al. Serial evoked potential studies and MRI imaging in chronic progressive multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci 1999; 171: 79-83
9 Margaritella N, Mendozzi L, Tronci F, et al. The evoked potentials score improves the identification of benign MS without cognitive impairment. Eur J Neurol 2013; 20: 1423-5
10 Fuhr P, Borggrefe-Chappuis A, Schindler C, Kappos L. Visual and motor evoked potentials in the course of multiple sclerosis. Brain 2001; 124: 2162-8
11 Kappos L, Lechner-Scott J, Wu S. Neurostatus.net. 2007 Available at: http://www.neurostatus.net.
(10.03.2018)
12 Mauguiere F, Allison T, Babiloni C, Buchner H, Eisen AA, Goodin DS, et al. Somatosensory evoked potentials / The International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl 1999; 52: 79-90.
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| 2018_01-1_157-160.pdf | 252.86 KB |
Русский
English