Saratov JOURNAL of Medical and Scientific Research

Rehabilitation after hip and knee joints replacement: several results of medical and sociological monitoring

Year: 2017, volume 13 Issue: №4 Pages: 796-799
Heading: Health Service Organization Article type: Original article
Authors: Fedonnikov A.S., Andriyanova Е.А., Erugina M.V, Norkin I.A.
Organization: Saratov State Medical University

Aim: research of rehabilitation process problem areas after hip and knee joints replacement. Material and Methods. Program of monitoring and evaluation of medical, organizational, social and psychological components of rehabilitation was developed. Sociological study of 1175 patients who have undergone in 2015-2016 total hip and knee joints replacement was conducted. Results. It was revealed an absence of real interaction between key parties of rehabilitation processes based on significant disproportion between high level (more than 80%) of patients' satisfaction of rehabilitation organizing and low activity of health managers (9.4%). Despite of declared patients' high rehabilitation quality permanent pain noted by 45% of respondents, move freely without additional support is available only for about 50% of patients. Conclusion. Rehabilitation management and its' quality are the key values for locomotor system functional recovery. Provided study has designated main problems of rehabilitation quality evaluation after hip and knee joints replacement.

1. Woolf AD, Pfleger B. Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2003, 81 (9): 646-56
2. Storheim K, Zwart JA. Musculoskeletal disorders and the Global Burden of Disease study. Ann Rheum Dis 2014 Jun; 73 (6): 949-50. DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-205327
3. Litwic A, Edwards Mark H, Dennison Elaine M. Cooper Cyrus. Epidemiology and burden of osteoarthritis. Br Med Bull 2013; 105(1): 185-199
4. Kremers MH, Larson DR, Crowson CS, et al. Prevalence of Total Hip and Knee Replacement in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2015 Sep 2; 97 (17): 1386-97. DOI: 10.2106/ JBJS.N.01141
5. Tikhilov RM, Kornilov NN, Kulyaba ТА, et al. Comparative analysis of knee replacement registers (review). Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia 2014; 2 (72): 112-121
6. Zagorodniy NV. Joint replacement in the Russian Federation: Papers of research and practice conference «Vreden readings». St. Petersburg, 2013
7. Asilova SU, Ruzibaev DR. Medical and social examination and rehabilitation of patients and disabled persons after the hip total arthroplasty. Orthopedic Genius 2015; (2): 36-39
8. Norkin IA, Baratov AV, Akimova TN, et al. The traumatological orthopedic service of region: problems and goals. Zdravookhranenie Rossiyskoy Federatsii 2014; 58 (4): 12-17
9. Statistic information of the Ministry of Health of Russia
10. Fedonnikov AS, Erugina MV, Andriyanova EA, Norkin IA. Medical and sociological issues of rehabilitation of patients after hip and knee joints replacement. Saratov Journal of Medical Scientific Research 2017; 13 (3): 763-766
11. Vinokurova AM. Features of health care institutional environment. Bulletin of Baikal State University 2013; (3): 61-65
12. Zagorodniy NV, Elkin DV, Banetskiy MV, etal. Medium-term results of femoral component of implants «Implant-Elit» by MATI-Medtech use in clinical practice at cementless fixation. Acta Biomedica Scientifica 2006; (4): 104-109
13. Kastyro IV, Torshin VI, Drozdova GA, Popadyuk VI. Acute pain intensity in men and women after septoplasty. Russian Open Medical Journal 2017; (6): e0305.

2017_04_796-799.pdf425.75 KB

No votes yet