Saratov JOURNAL of Medical and Scientific Research

Medical and sociological issues of rehabilitation of patients after hip and knee joints replacement

Year: 2017, volume 13 Issue: №3 Pages: 761-764
Heading: Traumatology and Orthopedics Article type: Original article
Authors: Fedonnikov A.S., Erugina M.V., Andriyanova E.A., Norkin I.A.
Organization: Saratov State Medical University

The aim: research of medical and social issues of rehabilitation after hip and knee joints replacement. Material and Methods. Sociological study of 1175 patients who have undergone in 2015-2016 total hip and knee joints replacement was conducted. Results. Within the scope of medical surveillance after the surgery 69.8% of patients made regular visits to orthopedic specialists after joint replacement, but only 9.4% of surveyed patients confirm the practice of active monitoring of rehabilitation on the part of health services. There had been determined a high level of declared patients satisfaction (more than 80%) with weak health managers activities argue considerable informational gap between the key parties of rehabilitation. Conclusion. Provided study has designated problem areas of patient and health system communication in rehabilitation after hip and knee joints replacement.

1. Woolf AD, Pfleger B. Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2003; 81 (9): 646-56
2. Loeser RF. Age-related changes in the musculoskeletal system and the development of osteoarthritis. Clin Geriatr Med 2010; 26(3): 371-86
3. Storheim K, Zwart JA. Musculoskeletal disorders and the Global Burden of Disease study. Ann Rheum Dis 2014 Jun; 73 (6): 949-50. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-205327
4. Litwic A, Edwards Mark H, Dennison Elaine M. Cooper Cyrus: Epidemiology and burden of osteoarthritis. Br Med Bull 2013; 105 (1): 185-199.
5. Schafer T, Pritzkuleit R, Jeszenszky C, et al. Trends and geographical variation of primary hip and knee joint replacement in Germany. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2013 Feb; 21 (2): 279-88. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2012.11.006. Epub 2012 Dec 5
6. Chechik O, Khashan M, Lador R, et al. Surgical approach and prosthesis fixation in hip arthroplasty world wide. Arch Or-thop Trauma Surg 2013 Nov; 133 (11): 1595-600. doi: 10.1007/ S00402-013-1828-0. Epub 2013 Aug 4
7. Anastase DM, Cionac Florescu S, Munteanu AM, et al. Analgesic techniques in hip and knee arthroplasty: from the daily practice to evidence-based medicine. Anesthesiol Res Pract 2014; 2014: 569319. doi: 10.1155/2014/569319. Epub 2014 Nov 17
8. Zagorodniy NV. Joint replacement in the Russian Federation. In: Papers of research and practice conference «Vreden readings». Saint-Petersburg, 2013. URL:
9. Tikhilov RM, Kornilov NN, Kulyaba ТА, et al. Comparative analysis of knee replacement registers (review). Travmatologiya i ortopediya Rossii 2014; 2 (72): 112-121
10. Goryannaya NA, Ishekova Nl, Popov VV, Bondaren-ko EG. Change of patients' quality of life after hip replacement at the first stage of rehabilitation. Human ecology 2017; (1): 41-44.

2017_03-2_761-764.pdf494.7 KB

No votes yet