Complex stimulation of peripheral nerve regeneration after deferred neurorrhaphy
Year: 2017, volume 13 Issue: №3 Pages: 732-737
Heading: Traumatology and Orthopedics Article type: Original article
Authors: Ivanov A.N., Korshunova G.A., Matveyeva O.V., Ninel V.G., Shutrov I.E., Shchanitsyn I.N., Andronova Т.А., Norkin I.A.
Organization: Saratov Regional Child Clinical Hospital, Saratov State Medical University
Heading: Traumatology and Orthopedics Article type: Original article
Authors: Ivanov A.N., Korshunova G.A., Matveyeva O.V., Ninel V.G., Shutrov I.E., Shchanitsyn I.N., Andronova Т.А., Norkin I.A.
Organization: Saratov Regional Child Clinical Hospital, Saratov State Medical University
Summary:
The aim is to study the complex stimulation effect including skin autotransplantation and electrical stimulation of the sciatic nerve on microcircular, electrophysiological and morphological changes after deferred neurorrhaphy in rats. Material and methods. The experiment was performed in 50 albino rats divided into control, comparative and experimental groups. In the experimental group, on the background of deferred neurorrhaphy, skin autotransplantation and electrical stimulation of the sciatic nerve had been carried out. In the comparative group only deferred neurorrhaphy was performed. Research methods included laser doppler flowmetry, electroneuromyography and morphological analysis of the operated nerve. Results. Complex stimulation including skin autotransplantation and direct action of electrical pulses on the sciatic nerve after its deferred neurorrhaphy causes restoration of bloodstream in the operated limb, promotes intensification of restoration of nerve fibers. Conclusion. Intensification of sciatic nerve regeneration after deferred neurorrhaphy in rats under the influence of complex stimulation including full-thickness skin graft autotransplantation and direct action of electrical pulses substantiates experimentally appropriateness of clinical testing of the given method for treatment of patients with peripheral nerve injuries.
Bibliography:
1. Shchanitsyn IN, Ivanov AN, Bazhanov SP, et al. Stimulation of peripheral nerve regeneration: current status, problems and perspectives. Uspehi fiziologicheskih nauk 2017; 48 (3): 92-11
2. Ivanov AN, Norkin IA, Ninel VG, et al. Peculiarities micro-circulatory changes in regeneration of the sciatic nerve under the experimental conditions. Fundamental research 2014; 4 (2): 281-285
3. Shchanitsyn IN, Ivanov AN, Bajanov SP, et al. Methods for studying changes in the spinal cord after traumatic injuries of peripheral nerves. Regional Haemodynamics and Microcircula-tion2015; 1 (49): 13-22
4. Krupatkin Al. Information aspects of microcirculation after surgical sympathectomy in posttraumatic complex regional pain syndrome. Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology 2013; 113(6-1): 17-21
5. Lyamina NP, Karpova ES, Kotel'nikova EV, et al. Preconditioning at the stages of invasive and rehabilitative treatment of patients with coronary heart disease. Klin med 2015; 93 (3): 14-20
6. Muldashev ER, Nigmatullin RT, Galimova VU. The concept of regenerative medicine "Alloplant". In: The newest methods of cellular technologies in medicine. Novosibirsk, 2014; p. 10
7. Pasechnikova EV, Maltsev EV, Sotnikova ЕР, et al. Preparations of tissue therapy. Part 1. Ophthalmological journal 2011; 3: 79-88
8. Ivanov AN, Matveeva OV, Shutrov IE, et al. Cellular mechanisms of skin autograft distant stimulating effect on microcirculation. Journal of New Medical Technologies 2016; 23 (2): 72-78
9. Ivanov AN, Shutrov IE, Norkin IA. Skin flap autografting as a method of microcirculation biostimulation in the conditions of normal and impaired innervation. Regional Haemodynamics and Microcirculation 2015; 14 (3): 59-65
10. Ivanov AN, Shutrov IE, Ninel', et al. The influence of skin flap autotransplantation and direct electrostimulation of sciatic nerve on nervous fiber regeneration. Cell and Tissue Biology 2017; 59 (7): 489-497.
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| 2017_03-2_732-737.pdf | 273.6 KB |
Русский
English