Functional and role status of obstetricians and gynecologists in the process of obstetric care.
Year: 2017, volume 13 Issue: №3 Pages: 475-480
Heading: Obstetrics and Gynecology Article type: Original article
Authors: Tkachenko L.V., Sedova А.А., Shestakov А.А., Gritsenko I.A.
Organization: Rostov-on-Don State Medical University, Volgograd Medical Scientific Center, Volgograd State Medical University
Heading: Obstetrics and Gynecology Article type: Original article
Authors: Tkachenko L.V., Sedova А.А., Shestakov А.А., Gritsenko I.A.
Organization: Rostov-on-Don State Medical University, Volgograd Medical Scientific Center, Volgograd State Medical University
Summary:
Objective: to determine the ratio of obstetricians and gynecologists roles during childbirth. Material and Methods. The questioning of obstetricians and gynecologists in the Volgograd and Rostov region has been conducted. The population was 1181. Sample random N=300. Results. Respondents acknowledge their own responsibility in 98%. Midwives agree that a woman is the main actor in the process of childbirth, but just 52,7% consider that it is necessary to inform a woman of principle for her birthing situations and do not trust its ability to make adequate decisions (52%). Conclusion. Obstetricians and gynecologists consider themselves the main actors of the process of childbirth, although not rule out the usefulness of the participation of other health professionals, respected the autonomy of women in decision-making, but prefer a higher level of confidence on the doctor. The application of advances personalized medicine is considered necessary for 69.7% of respondents, while recognizing their lack of awareness on this issue.
Keywords: delivery system , midwife, model of healing, mother, obstetrician and gynecologist, personalized medicine
Bibliography:
1. Sedova NN, Nawrockiy BA, Volchanskiy ME, et al. Theory and practice of applying quantitative methods of sociology in medicine. Medical News of the North Caucasus 2015; (4): 686-702
2. Grigoryan VA, Kostenko OV, Guba Tl. Ethical relationship problems "doctor — patient" and "doctor — doctor" in obstetric practice. Bioethics 2011; (2): 35-36
3. Medvedeva LM, Chebotareva ОА, Prize EV. Of the Cultural determinants of relationship models doctor and patient (on the example of paternalism). Bioethics 2010; (2): 22-24
4. Gushin AV, Solopov MM. Dynamics the relationship doctor-patient relationship in modern socio-economic conditions. Bioethics 2011; (2): 30-32
5. Medvedeva LM, Veshneva SA. Informed consent as the realization of the rights of the patient: retrospective issue. Bioethics 2012; (1): 22-24
6. Sedova NN, Solomatina EV. Legal concept of informed consent: gains and losses. Medical law 2015; (2): 19-23
7. Tkachenko LV, Generalova GE. Analysis of professional activities for midwives in the Volgograd region and ways to improve health care for women. Vestnik VolgGMU 2006; (5): 32-35
8. Sedova NN. Bioethics. М.: KnoRus, 2016; 234 p.
9. Shipunov DA, Maltseva NL, Shestakov AA. Dichotomy clinical and ethical decisions in medicine. Bioethics 2015; (1): 38-40
10. Tkachenko LV, Delaru AV. Attitude Ob/Gyns to practice partner (family) (according to the data of sociological research). Journal of the Russian Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists 2006; (4): 29-31
11. Robert М. Veatch. Patient-Physician Relation. Pt. 2: The Patient as Partner. Bloomington, IN, United States: Indiana University Press, 1991; 322 p.
12. Moiseeva ON. Roundtable "doctor — patient — society: model and reality". Bioethics 2013; 1 (11): 61-63. Russian (Моисеева О. H. Круглый стол «Врач — пациент — общество: модели и реальность» Биоэтика 2013; 1 (11): 61-63).
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| 2017_03_475-480.pdf | 340.54 KB |
Русский
English