Saratov JOURNAL of Medical and Scientific Research
Home

The influence of premorbid background on the course of urolithiasis

Year: 2017, volume 13 Issue: №2 Pages: 280-283
Heading: Urology Article type: Original article
Authors: Osnovin O.V., Popkov V.M., Fomkina O.A.
Organization: Saratov State Medical University
Summary:

Aim: to analyze the correlation between the unfavorable factors at newborn patients and children and the peculiarities of the course of urolithiasis in adults. Material and Methods. The data were received from questioning of 286 patients and their relatives, analysis of case histories and past medical histories. The material was statistically worked out. Results. The early development of urolithiasis (at patients under 30) was associated with the threat of termination of pregnancy, prematurity, excretory and digestive disorders at childhood in case of severe anamnesis of urolithiasis, and also malnutrition. Bilateral lesions of the urinary system were determined to be associated with artificial feeding and prematurity, digestive diseases and complicated anamnesis of urolithiasis, malnutrition, deprived living conditions and low income. Stones in calyces occurred at patients with different complications at birth. More frequent cases of stone formation in renal pelvis were observed at premature and malnutrition patients and patients with cardiovascular diseases occurred during the childhood. Stones in ureters were considered as a result of respiratory diseases effect. Conclusion. Unfavorable factors occurred at birth and childhood, factors concerned with deprived social conditions and psychological problems influence the onset and the course of urolithiasis.

Keywords: premorbid background, urolithiasis

Bibliography:
1. Borisov VV, Dzeranov N.K. Urolithiasis: The therapy of patients with stones in kidney and ureter. Moscow, 2011; 96 p.
2. Popkov VM, Blumberg Bl, Osnovin OV, Fomkin RN. "Prolite Septo" in complex treatment of patients with acute pyelonephritis and nephrolithiasis. Saratov Journal of Medical Scientific Research 2011; 7 (s2): 217
3. Glybochko PV, Nikolenko VN, Osnovin OV, Fomkin RN. The influence of somatotype patients with urolithiasis on the structure and severity of complications of extracorporeal lithotripsy Russiyskiy medico-biologicheskiy vestnik im. Acad.l. P. Pavlov 2007; (3): 83-87
4. Bekov DB. Study of the individual anatomical variability is one of the problems of modern morphology. Archive of anatomy histology and embryology 1991; (7): 85
5. Heldt VG, Kuzovleva IG, Yudina EV. Obstruction of the urinary tract in the fetus: postnatal verification and management tactics. Prenatal diagnosis 2005; 4 (2):100-107
6. Ignatova M.S. Prevention of nephropathy and prevention of progression of kidney disease in children. Russian Herald of Perinatology and Pediatrics 2005; (6): 3-8
7. Stamatelou КК, Francis ME, Jones СА, Nyberg LM. Time trends in reported prevalence of kidney stones in the United States: 1976-1994. Kidney Int. 2003; 63:1817-1823
8. Turk C, Petrik A, Sarica K, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Straub M, Knoll T. EAU Guidelines on Interventional Treatment for Urolithiasis. Eur Urol. 2016 Mar; 69 (3):475-82. doi: 10.1016/j. eururo.2015.07.041.

AttachmentSize
2017_02_280-283.pdf486.55 KB
All articles of the authors: Fomkina O.A., Osnovin O.V. , Popkov V.M.

No votes yet